What are required qualifications needed to voice a personal view?

[Guest guest]

Concerning "Vaisnavi Sadachar and Pravachan" within our beloved ISKCON, Past

and Present.

 

<< In a message dated 11/22/99 5:22:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,

Trivikrama.Swami (AT) bbt (DOT) se writes in response to Akrunath's post:

 

<< But for someone who is a practicing lawyer, I feel it is unfair for him

to

prejudice us in the case under discussion, or for that matter, in every and

any case that may come to us for consideration in the future.

Let us not be fooled by these sweet words into thinking that he is not

asking us to prejudge the current case based upon a completely different set

of circumstances. >>

 

Kusha's question: Why is a devotee lawyer disqualified from offering

discussion "in every and any case that may come to us for consideration in

the future?"

 

What qualifications are required when one cares enough to voice a personal

point of view?

 

Who are the "us" in which Trivikrama Maharaj is referring?

 

Endeavoring to be of service,

With the utmost sincerity and without contemptuous sarcasm,

Kusha mata