A/ Women in leading positions.

[Guest guest]

> [Text 2836443 from COM]

> >

> > > Sraddha dd wrote:

> > > > Woman in leading position is not dangerous. This statement is an

> > > > insult

> > > to

> > > > my beloved Vrinda devi who is the main manager in the spiritual

> world.

> > > She

> > > > is managing all the pastimes of Radha and Krishna.

> > >

> > > Mataji:

> > > HARE KRSNA ! ! ! Pamho, agtSP!

> > > How can you consider compare ordinary women with Vrnda devi and

> > > Srimati Radharani?

> >

> > I didn't compare them, I just gave an example. From this example we

> can

> > see that it is a part of the female nature to manage.

>

> Hare Krsna:

> pamho, agtSP

>

> You DID compare them you state: "...This statement is an

insult to my beloved Vrinda devi "

Yes, the statement "woman in leading position is dangerous" is an insult

to my beloved Vrinda devi. She is a woman and she is in a leading position,

and she is not dangerous.

 

> Srila Prabhupada our Founder-Acarya was a Sannyasi, he manage our society

> are you meaning a NO for Srila Prabhupada?

> >

 

I mean YES to Srila Prabhupada. If Srila Prabhupada should be the role

model then we should immedietely close all the ashram gurukulas, because he

never went to one. We should send all the children home to have loving

mothers and fathers, because that's what Prabhupada had. We should arrange

marriages of all our children so nicely, like Srila Prabhupadas parents did

it. We should send our children to collages to get the proper education and

be prepared to economically take care of their families in the future.

Because, that's what Prabhupada did it. We should send all our sannyasis

back to grihastha-ashrama untill they don't fill proper age, that they get

some experience about grihastha life, so that in the future they know what

they are talking about. Because, that's what Prabhupada did it. We should

send all the brahmacaris back to education and their previous jobs to be

able to economically take care of their families, because Prabhupad was

never a brahmacari.

O, boy, arn't we in a MESS?

 

> Puting ladies in managment position is not going to be problem of

> society.

> > In the west many ladies are already managing.

>

> Please can you give practical examples, are you still speaking of ladies

> within ISKCON?

> If not I am not interest on those examples.

>

 

Yes, I am speaking about ladies in the WEST ISKCON managing. They are head

pujaris, they are head cooks, they are in the boards.

Examples: Ganga devi, unmarried, head pujari and head cook (Their

Lordships Sri Sri Gandharvika-Giridhari), Sriprada dd, unmarried, head

pujari and head cook (Their Lordships Sri Sri Panca-tattva), Savitri dd,

married, (her husband is not managing) the chief and the executive of the

managment board here in Gothenburg, has her own shop by the side too. Almvik

board (half of the members men, half women). I don't know which kind of

universe you are living in, but I am in this one.

 

By the way, if you have so many qualified men, why don't you send some

over here, we are in lack of it.

 

> Did you realize that or you just speak what books teach us?

 

The thing is that those who have realised don't boast around with it, so

one doesn't even notice them. That doesn't mean that they don't exist. There

are people outside ISKCON who have realised that too, who are able to

communicate with Krishna and they do.

Anybody can taste love as soon as one gives up neediness, expectations and

jealousy.

 

 

> yes, woman can do it ONLY as a service to help her husband managing

> service, other way she cann't.

Your statement that they can't do it, doesn't stop them doing it. I gave

you the examples. They are over here and they are doing it, no matter what

you say.

 

Ys. Sraddha dd