Guest guest Posted December 15, 1999 Report Share Posted December 15, 1999 > But it was not the result of a superior gurukula training--rather, the > inauspicious, tragic result of gross neglect and abuse. Abuse of a good > thing does not turn the good thing into bad. As in the example above, if I > take a superexcellent motor vehicle and drive it into the wall of your > apartment building or home, that doesn't mean that the superior vehicle > has become inferior. It simple means that I, the driver, am a flaming > idiot! Not the designer of the car, not the car itself, but the *driver* > was the inferior component. You are argueying on slippering ground here... What if there was a construction failure, or a defect in the material in your "superior vehicle", that can also happens sometimes, despite ones best wishes? Normally an experiment is tested on a very small scale before it may be advertised on a larger scale as a good and superour solution to another better alternative. Otherwise one may well be held responsible for it, if it failes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.