Guest guest Posted December 28, 1999 Report Share Posted December 28, 1999 Hare Krishna. I don't think it would be out of line to point out that "sucks" is not appropriate Vaishnava terminology. It belittles both the speaker and the listener. These misogynist threads should be terminated anyway, because there has ceased to be any useful discussion. "Demonization" is a well-known, dishonest debate strategy. Demonization is the process in which individuals are lumped in to a category and then the category is given an unflattering connotation. For example: In modern warfare, many non-ksatriya types are deployed as soldiers. Since these soldiers are not by nature inclined to kill, the commanders encourage depersonalization of the enemy. If a soldier in battle thinks of the person he is shooting at as an individual like himself -- with a wife and family, with hopes and fears as he has -- then he may hesitate to fire. But if the enemy is given an ugly moniker like kraut, nip or gook, and the enemy soldier is simply a member of that awful group, then it is much easier to pull the trigger. If our debates descend to the level of evaluating the mental health and psychological state of participants, then the discussion ceases to have any useful purpose and simply becomes a breeding ground for offense. Your servant, Sri Rama das [srirama (AT) bbt (DOT) se], or [srirama (AT) jps (DOT) net] < PLEASE NOTE THIS NEW EMAIL ADDRESS ========================== Asvasthanasa.HKS (AT) bbt (DOT) se [Asvasthanasa.HKS (AT) bbt (DOT) se] Monday, December 27, 1999 10:59 AM COM: DMW (Dharma of Men and Women); COM: India (Continental Committee) Open (Forum); COM: Varnasrama development; COM: (International) Women's Ministry GHQ sucks [Text 2888278 from COM] > authors submit to psychoanalysis. But as far as I am concerned, most/all > of the GHQ members were/are much more concerned for the welfare of ISKCON > and society at large than they were/are to belittle or blaspheme > Vaisnavis. The road to hell is also paved with good intentions.. ;-) > quite materially intelligent, while some may be seriously deficient in > spiritual intelligence. What is the basis of such a claim? > should not be aggravated. He doesn't at all convey an attitude of grave > concern for the "fact" that he is dealing with misogynists, social > criminals. So perhaps those who are disturbed with the GHQ agenda should > also lighten up a bit, have a good chuckle, and push forward in Krsna > consciousness with fresh minds on these topics. while GHQ Generals continue on with lobbying GBC and similar QuarterHeaded activities? This just looks like powertrip and ugly one as well. Come on guys, you are supposed to be 9 times smarter than that... asvasrama Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 1999 Report Share Posted December 28, 1999 > But their pride, arrogance, self-estime, eliticisam, low-class > manners, lack of compassion and respect to others, obsession > with women, hate of women, aggressiveness towards anybody who's > "on their way", and so on,... all this quickly discloses their > position. > > > > - Mahanidhi das This was one of the best comments I ever read about this. Sometimes it is really so obviously stupidity what comes out of the mind of our great societysaver-MAN. Actually they need very much love and compassion to find the healthy path. Thank you Prabhu! ys Nigraha das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.