in conclusion about banning Satya Narayana or whomever we may ban.

[Guest guest]

>>Replying to Ekatma Prabhu's comment concerning Kundali Prabhu's banning

>>due to political consideration is not the same to be classified with Satya

>>Narayana belittling our sampradaya.

 

My point exactly is that it could have been, and therefore I brought up the

question as to whether it is such kind of banning or not. I wanted to point

out that banning for political reasons is also possible, and if banning

takes place for non-specific reasons, we should question why such banning.

 

Now that we found out it is not the kind of political banning that it could

have been, I think the discussion is somewhat clear and dealt with.

 

Also, now that many of you realized why such banning took place, we may take

the appropriate action, as I noted some of the readers already doing in

regards to the Jiva Institute. This is exactly the point of questioning

obscure rules. We may now whitness the great benefits of questioning

obscurities, contrary to following them in good faith without understanding.

Right?

 

Your servant,

Ekatma das