Guest guest Posted April 30, 1999 Report Share Posted April 30, 1999 Home Base: Sri Mayapur Candrodaya Mandir, Navadwip Dhama, Nadia, WB, INDIA Camp: Narasimha Caturdasi (Appearance) Festival, ISKCON Sri Mayapur, India > His Holiness Jayapataka Swami maharaja, > please accept my most humble obeisances. All glories to ISKCON > founder-acarya Srila Prabhupada. All glories to your tireless service and > pure, unalloyed devotion. > I had a quick question in regards to Radha-Ramana caran das Babaji. He > is of course, as you know, the one who began the famous chant of "Jaya > Nitai Gaura Radhe-Syama, Japa Hare Krsna Hare Rama". I had read in one > book, the "Saints of Bengal", that at the end of his life he gave some > allusion to the idea that he was Ananga-manjari(Balarama/Nityananda in the > madhurya-rasa or as some say, Jahnavi devi, the internal potency of Sri > Nityananda Prabhu). I don't mean to cause any offense to the author of > that book, but I am simply confused on this point: he mentions in his > notes for that chapter that just as Caitanya Mahaprabhu gave evidence in > the Caitanya-Bhagavata that He would return in other incarnations, so it > is fully possible that Nityananda Prabhu could also return again and he > seems to support the notion that Radha-ramana caran das Babaji was an > incarnation of Sri Nityananda Prabhu. But I have read in the biography of > Bhakti-siddhanta Sarasvati Thakur that he opposed this Radha-ramana caran > das Babaji and called him out as a sahajiya and because of this the Thakur > was not very much appreciated in Jagannatha Puri. > Have you heard anything of this before? Please be kind and merciful > and bless me with your insights on this issue. > > your aspiring servant, > jayadeva dasa It is not accepted by our sampradaya that either of these two are incarnations of anyone from the spiritual world. It is quite common in India to claim to be an incarnation of someone, but Srila Prabhupada has given the standard criteria for how to tell an incarnation: 1) through sastric predictions, 2) specific bodily features which match up with the predictions and sastric descriptions, and 3) finally being able to do something extra-ordinary which a normal person couldn't do. Unless the three criteria are met we can't accept anyone as an incarnation. > I don't mean to cause any offense to the author of > that book, but I am simply confused on this point: he mentions in his > notes for that chapter that just as Caitanya Mahaprabhu gave evidence in > the Caitanya-Bhagavata that He would return in other incarnations, so it > is fully possible that Nityananda Prabhu could also return again and he > seems to support the notion that Radha-ramana caran das Babaji was an > incarnation of Sri Nityananda Prabhu. Basicly the "Nitai Gaur RAdhe Shyama" group were not considered as a bona fide sampradaya by Srila Prabhupada. He mentions them by name in CC as not being properly situated, but still feeling bliss when they chant the name of Lord Sri Krishna Caitanya Mahaprabhu. So what to speak of being incarnations... By word jugglery so many things can be interpolated. We have to be very careful about this kind of tendency to speculate and deviate. If Nityananda Prabhu is going to come again then it should be specifically predicted in Sastra. If He is coming with Lord Sri Krishna Caitanya Mahaprabhu then where is Lord Caitanya? So please be careful and try to concentrate on reading Srila Prabhupada's books. For reference if we have to read something then we should take as authoritative bona fide translations of actual works of previous acaryas or recognized scripture. I could say more, but let's follow the KISS principle: Keep It Short Sadhu... I hope that this finds you in good health. Your well wisher, Jayapataka Swami Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.