Guest guest Posted September 15, 1999 Report Share Posted September 15, 1999 Hare Krishna. Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! I have a question regarding the concept of "plenary expansion." I had formerly understood this term to refer to an expansion of Krishna (such as Rama, Narayana, Vishnu, etc) who is equal in every respect to svayam bhagavan. This is based on the dictionary definition of "plenary" - "Full; entire; complete; absolute" as per Webster's online dictionary. However, recently I have seen this term "plenary expansion" used in a different sense. In SB 5.6.6, Lord Rishabhadeva is referred to as a "plenary expansion of Lord Vaasudeva, Krishna." This is in spite of the fact that he has been explicitly described as a shakytaavesha avataara, or empowered jiiva, both by Srila Prabhupada (in the synonyms just above) as well as by Jiva Gosvami in his Bhagavat Sandarbha. This brings to mind the following question - what exactly does it mean to be a plenary expansion of Krishna/Vishnu if even the shakytaavesha avataaras can be described as plenary expansions of Him? I thought that the difference between Krishna's full expansions and His shakytaaveshas was that the latter are jiivas empowered by Vishnu, and not actually Vishnu Himself. If a shakytaavesha avataara can be described as a plenary expansion of Vishnu, then can the demigods and other jiivas also be correctled described as plenary expansions of Vishnu? In what sense are these "non plenary" expansions actually "plenary" if they can be described as plenary expansions? yours, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.