Guest guest Posted September 21, 2000 Report Share Posted September 21, 2000 > So I agree that for the time being we should omit the word SHE in our > proposal just to retain order until the SHE issue can be debated very > thoroughly and conclusively as I suggested above. > Agreed, but this issue requires much debate in order to satisfy those who > disagree. So this should be properly debated when there is facility for an > all inclusive forum. > So I would agree that initially we institute the stict varnasrama principle > as you have suggested on the basis that sannyasis can have no association > with women. This principle can never be compromised. > > Let's start as you suggested with the proper varnasrama structure with no > sannyasis in management and then debate all the other contentious issues > very thoroughly later when we will have a much better forum. > > What do you think? Okay. Vaisnava dasabhas Nayana-ranjana das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.