Guest guest Posted October 22, 2000 Report Share Posted October 22, 2000 > > > I really don't like to get into hair-splitting arguments. It seems > > obvious to me, in spite of your arguments, that a woman being a member > > of the GBC does not make her *the* chief executive officer of ISKCON. > > It does make her a "chief executive officer". OK, OK. So what about a co-GBC or a deputy GBC? That can go, no? Then she is rather an "executive officer", not "chief" really. Why not make a deal? Let all the sannyasis just go out and preach to the people about Krsna and stop acting as chief executive officers, and on the other side all those women that have been occupying the positions in the GBC since ISCKON's existence go back to their kitchens. - mnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.