Guest guest Posted February 18, 2002 Report Share Posted February 18, 2002 On 15 Feb 2002, Raghunata John wrote: > Ditto. I used the term to explain the quality of Ananta Rupa's care in > the other areas of his administration. He does excellent work as an > administrator etc because he loves what he does. The quality of his care > is in fact impressive and so leaves those who have seen his program > disarmed into recognizing what he is doing as a child molester. > Madhusudani dasi > Just to clarify; Ananta Rupa can hardly be classified as a lover. If he > is > having sex with those boys, he is a child molester . Consensual sex > between > two adult males is not the same as sex between an adult authority figure > > and a child. It's abuse, even if the child does not fight it. > Ys, The question is: are the children happy? What does it mean that "the child doesn't fight it". What would have happened to these kids if they were not taken care by Ananta Rupa's "loving care"? Do the orphans have a better choice practically? --Ak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.