Guest guest Posted February 25, 2002 Report Share Posted February 25, 2002 > >of that claim. That's all. End of story. I will not discuss this side of > >things further. > > And I was just about to slap your fingers! ;-) Just as well I've chosen this path then > And from what you said, some private texts generated by you as well, > though I'm sure it's not what you would call campaigning. :-) I'm sorry to belabour this point, but if I've written a 'private text' to someone and you've seen it, then it kind of underlines the 'campaigning' thing, doesn't it? Anyway, well enough alone. I'm sure it's going on but I'm no longer much interested Greater drama can be found in safer quarters. Ys Braja Sevaki dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2002 Report Share Posted February 26, 2002 On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Mukhya (dd) (BES Asst. SysOp) wrote: > > Actually, Ekanath apologized to *her* for upsetting her - he didn't > > apologize for what he'd written. This is one of the major points - the > > looseness. > Since you bring up this incident again and again, I will ask Ekanath to > explain here what he wrote and why. From personal experience, I can say that those TD members who made most inflammatory, radical, unsubstantiated, dubious, and in the judgement of many, offensive statements--generally never explained them even when so requested. Definitely, this was always my experience with Madhu, if that matters. So it will be interesting to see if Ekanatha Prabhu responds at all now. > But with the kind of language you used against her it becomes impossible to > communicate and clear up the issues. This is why I objected to it. Yes, and it's why I have to agree with Mukhya here too. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2002 Report Share Posted February 26, 2002 On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Mukhya (dd) (BES Asst. SysOp) wrote: > > I hardly think that a derogatory mood towards Srila Prabhupada and his > > teachings falls under the category of "unity in diversity" in any sense. (re: TD) > Some members have written about controversial statements by Srila > Prabhupada too. But Ekanath is the only one who has been sarcastic a couple > of times. Here I must strongly disagree, because this definitely wasn't my observation, and I was a member of TD for roughly two years. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.