Real Action

[Guest guest]

> Perhaps we should call this

> conference Prabhupadanugas? Then those who are involved are left in no

> doubt what it is about.

 

We already have "Prabhupada Disciples" and "Granddisciples of Srila

Prabhupada" on Pamho. I think it is better to have this conference for

philosophical discussions, as you originally suggested, but with an adjusted

name.

 

Mdd

[Guest guest]

At 12:27 AM 2/27/2002 +1000, you wrote:

>Yes but seeing as how this is an ISKCON forum, it alarms me that you want to

>quote NM. Alarms, but doesn't surprise. Perhaps we should call this

>conference Prabhupadanugas? Then those who are involved are left in no doubt

>what it is about.

 

With affection and respect, I think this is a terrible idea. The word is so

loaded that it creates a platform for vilifying anyone who doesn't see eye

to eye with me, since, after all, I am really following Srila Prabhupada.

 

In fact, Srila Prabhupada and all the acharyas assert repeatedly that we

are Rupanugas.

 

Babhru

[Guest guest]

At 07:32 AM 2/26/2002 -0800, you wrote:

> However, I have seen that H.H. Narayana Maharaja has really helped

>a lot of devotees who were already down and out, so to speak. So although

>in one sense, we can see that his followers are primarily the rejects and

>losers of ISKCON, at the same time, he has been able to help them now more

>than ISKCON could. The most unfortunate thing I've noticed is that many

>of the same ones who caused problems in ISKCON are now causing problems

>for Narayana Maharaja. Hitopadesa says one's conditional nature

>(svabhava) stands out above everything else, no matter how much

>reformation one undergoes.

 

Ditto. My observation has been exactly the same.

 

Babhru