Guest guest Posted March 1, 2002 Report Share Posted March 1, 2002 > And some other points could be mentioned too. But I guess, > these few above are already too many, I am afraid... And > ISKCON is only a couple of decades old. I wander how the early > Christianity of that age looked alike. Well I'm sure you - and anyone who agrees with you - would think it was far superior to ISKCON. In absolutely every way. For example, they nailed the founder-acharya to the cross.... Your text was a selective history from a particular angle. It does not represent the whole, nor is it representative of the current or future state of ISKCON. So I would have to wonder, when will there be some 'going forward' in your approach to ISKCON, or are you content to simply dwell on these aspects? Please don't take this as a challenge - I'm seriously curious what it is you hope to achieve by pointing these things out constantly - whether they have some element of truth or not, which is itself questionable. There has to be a point where one can see things from a positive viewpoint, instead of constantly dragging one's mind down like this? Braja Sevaki dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.