Real Action

[Guest guest]

> > I'm not really interested in being on a forum with so-called ISKCON

> > devotees, when all I seem to do is defend ISKCON. I'm really tired of

> > it,

>

> I can imagine you are really tired when all you seem to

> do is defend ISKCON from so-called ISKCON devotees here.

> But why don't you afford yourself a break from it for a week

> or so, you have really deserved it. You have been on 24hours

> shift lately, on the alert all the time, policing the place

> so meticulously, standing up firmly in defense of ISKCON,

> against all these terrible attacks done here.. You definitelly

> need some rest, so why not take it? And belive me, ISKCON will

> still manage to hold up in the meantime..

>

>

> - mnd

 

So you're asking me to 'go away'? Interesting, in light of your text to

Jahnu....

[Guest guest]

On 2 Mar 2002, Babhru das wrote:

 

> At 02:50 PM 3/3/2002 +1000, Braja wrote:

> >I wonder if that would be a bit of a detriment to being organizer of an

> >ISKCON conference? That is of course if you accept that this is an ISKCON

> >conference, because I'm not sure what it's meant to be if it's not.

 

Dear Babhru,

Your service description to Radha and Krsna is wonderful. I was sad to read

Braja asking to justify yourself. As the moderator of this conference, you

should write a mission of statement. Definitely, in my opinion, you should

assume this role fully. Mukya and Raktambar should also make a public

statement about the changes that are taking place with Com and its political

consequences if any. What is exactly Com editorial policy? Actually, this

conference, here, AKC, is going on only because of Braja and Jahnu

determination to argue. The challenge will be to pass to another stage and see

if devotees could generate discussions without getting into the eternal

arguments given by fondamentalists.