Guest guest Posted March 7, 2002 Report Share Posted March 7, 2002 At 11:15 AM 3/7/2002 -0800, you wrote: > > My understanding of this is that the discussion about Tripurari Swami's > > Gita > > >was taking place on the Granddisciples conference. I would have to agree > > >that that discussion on that conference was not appropriate. > > > > Well aware of the danger of perpetuating this thread, I feel compelled to > > ask why. Rama Keshava is a granddisciple, too. It would have been > > inapproriate, I think, if he had made remarks critical of Tamal Krishna > > Maharaj or Jayapataka Maharaj, or any of the members' gurus; it seems to > > me just as inappropriate for them to criticize his. Got 'em. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2002 Report Share Posted March 8, 2002 > The point was that the reason why it was not appropriate > was to protect the granddsiciples of Srila Prabhupada from > the deviations in the literatures of the non-ISKCON Vaisnava > authors. Particularly, one translation of BVT Swami in his > Bhagavad-gita was literally speaking "taken apart" as to > "demonstrate" how he was deviating from Srila Prabhupada's > translations/comments, how BVT Swami was simply a kind > of a "muni" who misinterprets Krsna's words for the sake > of diverting our attention from Krsna onto himself.. > And so on, and so on. Mahanidhi, this is not how it was presented at all. Ys, Jahnu das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.