Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- New Text 20563 (101 lines) [W1] Bhakti Vikasa Swami 07-Apr-04 03:30 -0400 Prabhupada Disciples Tridandi Sannyasa Quotes liberalism and decline in Christianity --------------------------- ISKCON trendsetters might take into account that adjustment with modern materialistic society is causing the death of Christian denominations. See below -- from a text sent to me. (NB The United Church is one of Canada's most liberal churches condoning gay marriage, feminism, women ministers etc.) Here is another blog from my favorite, very very Angry (with a capital "A") ex Episcopalian: His blog (Midwest Conservative Journal) can be found at http://mcj.bloghorn.com 4/1/2004 7:58:54 PM ICHABOD In Canada's new Western Standard, which has just been added to the links here, Candis McLean describes Canada's Christian decline: Jones has seen it with his own eyes. But the statistics back up the grim picture for the future of what used to count as some of Canada’s most popular denominations. In 2001, 43 per cent of Canadians told Statistics Canada that they had not attended religious services in the past year, compared with only 26 per cent in 1986. And most of that decline occurred within the six largest denominations. Amongst Presbyterians there was a precipitous 36 per cent decline in occasional churchgoers between 1991 and 2002 while Pentecostals saw a 15 per cent drop off in the same category. There were eight per cent fewer people reporting they belonged to the United Church, seven per cent fewer attending Anglican services and Lutherans suffered a five per cent fall off. In Calgary alone over the past three years, five of 34 United Churches, Canada’s largest Protestant denomination, have ceased to exist: two closed altogether while five were forced to merge. For Jones’ Calgary congregation at 93-year-old Trinity United Church in the inner-city Inglewood neighbourhood, it was rotting windows that signaled to the congregation that the church was in trouble. After 25 years of declining attendance, the fewer than 40 valiant members of the once 250-strong congregation were brought to their knees: Despite fund-raisers and digging deep, they couldn’t even afford the sort of basic repairs needed to sustain their old, beloved church. A storm of meetings led to the painful decision in October 2002 to close the following year. Four months later, after managing a minor resurgence in attendance, the congregation was split over whether to proceed with the closure. The decision was made for them. In February 2003, Presbytery, the local governing body of elected lay and ministerial delegates, started to move in. It fired the church board members and installed its representative as chairman, all powers granted to it by the United Church manual. As well as the cluelessness of Canada's liberal Christians: “A disproportionate number of our United Church congregations in the Calgary area are struggling with participation, leadership, facility maintenance, and finances.” His solution seems to lie in a plan to purchase two new properties in the city’s outlying areas. Rather than just another house of worship, however, [Reverend Joel] Den Haan says members want a “gutsy” new concept: a “multi-use outreach facility” with “less emphasis on worship space” and more opportunity for partnerships with arts organizations, schools and other faith groups. They will be, he writes, “more than just a church.” The problem with that idea, notes McLean, is that it is exactly the opposite of what Canadian Christianity needs: But a number of theologians following the mainline Church crisis say that’s something denominations should do only if they have a death wish. The shocking secret, they say, is that people actually want to worship God. They’re not looking for the down-to-earth, but its reverse, the supernatural – the reality beyond human understanding, the divine entity beyond the physical world. John Stackhouse, Jr., professor of theology and culture at Vancouver’s Regent College, says the declining mainline churches have lost members by trying to pander to everyone until those attending were not hearing anything much different from opinions in newspaper editorial pages. “Especially in larger cities where many churches became social work agencies with a cross on top, the Presbyterian, United and Anglican churches got away from traditional teachings about the supernatural,” he says. “Jesus was no longer the Son of God who died on the cross for the sins of the world. He was just a great example of how to live a godly life.” Congregants, he said, were made to feel that it was okay to pick and choose the messages from the Bible that they felt most comfortable with and free to disagree with anything they thought was too ardent, violent or sexist. Because some Canadian churches are actually thriving. These kind: But not all churches are waning. Last year alone Baptist membership in Canada increased 10 per cent while some smaller, more fundamentalist Protestant congregations, such as Evangelical Missionary Church, have increased a whopping 48 per cent, opening huge new facilities to accommodate the swelling crowds and conducting multiple services each weekend. Many religious scholars say that Canadians’ thirst for a relationship with God is as great as it ever was. But the reasons are just now becoming clear for the dramatic differences between those denominations that will languish into the 21st century and those that will flourish. On the rise are churches that tend to be conservative, evangelical (they faithfully accept the Gospel), that offer their congregants a sense of certainty, and those that promulgate a supernatural faith which believes that God plays an active role in people’s lives. Politically incorrect, they are unapologetically historic. In short, it is the old time religions that are thriving. None of this ought to be particularly surprising except to Canadian liberals. Like most everyone everywhere, Canadians want to believe in something rather than nothing at all. Because they know you can't feed a hungry man with a picture of a meal. (Text 20563) -------------- - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.