Regarding birthtimes.

[Guest guest]

Logic tells us that when a large sample of birth times are sampled, we

should get an even distribution of minutes. Unfortunately this is not what

my statistics show.

 

I am maintaining a "free horoscope" site in the web and have more than 30

000 registered users there and each one of them has entered at least

one chart into site's database. For technical reasons I was able to quickly

research only 27 574 of those charts birthminutes and here are the results.

First column shows the minute and the second one shows the number of how

many times this minute has been entered to the database as birth minute. I

hope it is clear.

 

As you may see, 00 is the most popular "birth minute" and 30 is next

popular. Then we have 45 and 15 in the top and only then all others come.

 

This shows clearly that birth times are often rounded, either already in the

hospital or by the persons who have entered their data into my site's

database but haven't confirmed it from birth certificate and are just

quoting from mind.

 

But things are improving. Birth times are recorded more carefully now.

Look at this article:

http://www.urania.info/story/2003/6/21/766/61084

 

Your servant,

Abhirama das

 

minute --- count

00 --- 7682

30 --- 6470

45 --- 2189

15 --- 1518

10 --- 1115

20 --- 1113

50 --- 1102

5 --- 981

40 --- 845

55 --- 814

25 --- 757

35 --- 742

3 --- 97

32 --- 89

12 --- 85

1 --- 74

2 --- 71

58 --- 70

23 --- 66

42 --- 59

47 --- 57

4 --- 57

17 --- 57

43 --- 54

56 --- 54

28 --- 54

48 --- 53

7 --- 51

13 --- 51

59 --- 51

53 --- 48

34 --- 48

37 --- 47

57 --- 45

14 --- 45

38 --- 44

9 --- 44

33 --- 43

36 --- 42

22 --- 42

52 --- 41

26 --- 41

31 --- 40

8 --- 40

27 --- 40

46 --- 39

21 --- 38

44 --- 36

24 --- 36

6 --- 36

16 --- 35

49 --- 35

54 --- 33

18 --- 31

29 --- 28

11 --- 28

41 --- 25

39 --- 17

19 --- 15

51 --- 14