Guest guest Posted July 7, 1999 Report Share Posted July 7, 1999 > Well? Did you get my text? Yes, I received it, but no one here knows about the book you sent. It may be with Samba, who has not been in this project for 9 months or so. Plus, without a name for the book, it becomes very hard to locate. Your statements seemed much more geared towards the business you have developed, and the use of a dry type system. As I said in my original letter, this will not work properly in our communities, due to the fact the devotees use so much water for washing, flushing, etc. PLease give me your comments on this very important point. thanks. I want to keep up this dialogue until I have a very clear understanding of the system you propose, and I can understand if/how it can be used here in Mayapur. thank you. I hope you are well and happy. Your servant, Gaura Sakti Dasa The name of the book is THE LOST SCIENCE OF ORGANIC CULTIVATION It is available from us here in England. cost £12.99 and can be sent over with someone travelling to Mayapur. >Your statements seemed much more geared towards the business you have >developed, and the use of a dry type system. >As I said in my original letter, this will not work properly in our >communities, due to the fact the devotees use so much water for washing, >flushing, etc. This toilet is specifically designed for Devotees who apply this practice. It works equally well for devotees and karmis. The reason I say this is that even using the washing practice this toilet is still considered a dry system. That is because the amount of water employed is minimal compared to a flushing system which involves a large amount of water. When I made the original hour long presentation to the SMPDC in London |Harikesa prabhu did also suggest that he would give me the pipe at the back of a building that carried a normal sewage flow and ask me to deal with it. At the time I said no, I could not deal with it. However time changes things and now with given technology I feel this kind of situation could well be dealt with satisfactorily rediverting the solids to a composting situation rather than to expensive conventional sewage treatment. The reason I say this is because I know a company that does this in the UK. They also sell the end product through 170 outlets as a highly sustainable solution to an age old problem. The reason I prefer any system that does not involve transportaion via water is because Manu Samhita says it is not recommended. There are many reasons I have come to understand why this should be so. The obvious ones are: 1. (drinking) water saving and non pollution of Holy water. 2. Economy 3. Creation of fetiliser 4. Labour created for animals and man. If, as has been discussed at length, the city of Dvaraka had a dry sanitation system then why not Mayapur? We are hoping for a project that will last 10,000 years. Therefore maximum sustainability systems should be a priority. Some major advantages for such a system are: 1. No electricity required 2. No moving parts or high tech engineering 3. Natural avoidance of pollution through flooding The amount of liquid collected i.e., washing water and urine is sufficinetly disposed of through the irrigation necessary in the composting process. I have developed an automatic irrigation system for the application of this liquid to compost windrows which is gravity fed. (low tech) The filter system in the different models of toilet are the key to this system being a practicality. HOWEVER, In order to facilitate the existing buildings there that do have a water borne system the technology I have discovered can cater for this and divert the solids to a composting situation. It is, as you may immagine, much more of a high tech solution than that required by a non water borne system. I have suggested before that I think Mayapur would benefit from both systems given the existing extensive developments so far. But I would also suggest that to continue down the path of a dry management system as far as possible would be prefereable, in the long term view, offering a less problematic solution. Here in England I have formed a company which has backers who will be handling various aspects of the company. They see the potential for third world countries as enormous and are as keen as I am to see it develop. Either system that we are talking about here would involve the extensive use of micro-organisms. This is the latest advancement in agricultural development, again - of a low tech nature. These organisms are naturally formed under certain circumstances which are created via the simplest of management techniques. We completed this while staying at the Goshala during 1996-7. In fact the result of the application of this simple technology reveals that one of the quickest things to disappear in compost is stool due to its high nitrogen content which is higher when it is raw and untreated than when it is part treated i.e. by bio-digester and thus the results are more effective. I am working with the Environment Agency here in England to establish this practise as a precedent for the future that they will endorse; thus making the system employable in any country of the world. A small scale trial has been completed in England and found to be successful. We are currently working on trials on a large scale. Your servant, Radha Krsna das. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.