Guest guest Posted February 29, 2000 Report Share Posted February 29, 2000 > >Certainly you are accruing credit for taking care of cows, but as far as >I'm >concerned, your texts are the worst on this conference. Dear Prabhus, PAMHO AGTSP I agree with Ram Prasad Prabhu on this point. You paint everyone >else as negative and blasphemous, when that brush can just as easily paint >you. I also agree on this point. Let the truth be spoken. It is about time. Dvibuja Prabhu, how can you continue to defend the actions of all the GBC, who have practically never even made one report on behalf of the cows? Then you offend anyone who dare question the GBC as to their managing abilities? This appears sentimental and fanatical to me. We cannot let them get away with this, no matter who they are. How is this blasphemous? Is the truth offensive? Then let me go to hell for the truth, I would rather be there then in a conference full of blind fanatics where you are censured for speaking the truth. And that is what the current ISKCON has felt like for the last few decades. It is so refreshing to read the texts that have posted here in the last few days by Niscala Prabhu, Ram Prasad Prabhu, Bhutatma Prabhu and others. Please let this type of open istagosthi-style discussion continue. It is very necessary to stem the tide of dissidents. If they cannot speak freely they will go elsewhere, and there will be no one left who can think. > >As I said earlier, when you see a negative text, just go over it. Now I'll >break my own advice because I believe your negativity to be so strong and >offensive and persistent that it is definitely discouraging me from using >this >conference to communicate and learn about cow protection. Please don't be discouraged Ram Prasad Prabhu, his opinion is not the majority here from the responses we have seen. > >I have been trying to make a good contribution to this conference, and I'm >sorry if I've offended devotees. I have tried to speak honestly, artfully, >and >good-naturedly. And you have done so. Please do not leave, your opinions are valued here. Your servant, Kesava Sakhi dd ____ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 29, 2000 Report Share Posted February 29, 2000 > -- > > Money > > 50% for Krishna consciousness, 25% for family, and 25% for emergencies. Rupa > Goswami has set the example of how we can distribute our wealth, and I'm not > sure that I understand this principle the same as it was explained to me. That was his equity at time of retirement, not his income. Unfortunately , most devotees can't tell the difference between cash flow and income, so why would I think they even know what equity means? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2000 Report Share Posted March 1, 2000 >< 50% for Krishna consciousness, 25% for family, and 25% for emergencies. Rupa Goswami has set the example of how we can distribute our wealth, and I'm not sure that I understand this principle the same as it was explained to me. <<That was his equity at time of retirement, not his income. Unfortunately ,most devotees can't tell the difference between cash flow and income, so why would I think they even know what equity means? Good you mention, prabhu ! It makes a whole different story and is so often misunderstood & misused. Also the life of Bhaktivinode Thakur shows the same example... Their lives are glorious, but our understandings are often a lot less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.