Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Can we get back into this discussion

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined"

 

 

-

COM: Prahladananda Swami <Prahladananda.Swami (AT) bbt (DOT) se>

Re: Sale of New Vraja Mandala?

 

 

> [Text 3001406 from COM]

>

>

> > This seems to be the situation on many other ISKCON farms. We feel there

> > are other options. Recently, we have been discussing on the COW

conference

> > the option of leasing land to householders. Basically we were discussing

> > the terms of such a lease. We feel it is possible to protect ISKCON, the

> > devotees, and the cows with a properly drawn up contract.

>

> What would be some of the general and details points which would be

> contained in such a contract?

>

We have not finalized anything yet. But here are some ideas of how it could

possibly be done. The first text is by Syamasundara and the second by

Madhava Gosh on the cow conference. We are thinking this now would be a good

time to seriously engage in this discussion on the cow conference to see

what more we can come up with.

 

Your servant,

Balabhadra das

 

 

[Text 2826485 from COM]

 

Dear Prabhus,

Balabhadra Prabhu suggested I submit something just to get the ball roling

on land reform. Here we go. Please give your comments and ideas. Madhava

Ghosh, Rohita, Hare krishna dd, etc etc

 

1. Any devotee who has agricultural experience, or can demonstrate his

ability to grow crops can lease ISKCON land.

 

2. All land must be fully utilised.

 

3.Any land not being used for agriculture or cow protection can be reclaimed

by the land holder with 6 months notice. The tenant must submit a plan of

land use to the land holder management and the minister of agriculture and

cow protection if they disagree with the decision. They must be able to use

the land within 6 months of notice of reclamation.

 

4.Any leased land can be passed down to children or dependants as long as

the ISKCON rules governing agriculture are maintained.

 

5. Land is leased dependant on agricultural and cow protection practice and

not on sadhana requirements

 

6. Land is leased at the rate of 10% of produce, or financial equivalent, as

chosen by lease holder. This figure will apply for 3 years after which it

can be negotiated in consulatation with the lease holder, the land holder

and the ministery of agriculture and cow protection.

 

7. The maximum lease rate will not exceed 25% of produce.

 

8. All land will be farmed using oxen. No machinery can be used which

replaces the oxen.

 

9. Oxen should be kept by the tenant

 

10. Oxen can be loaned/rented from the local goshala if available

 

11. All land farmed according to the following principles:

No manufactured fertilizers/blood based fertilisers

No pesticides used

No herbicdes used

 

12. Working the land should be no less than 75% of the lease holders

livelihood

 

13. Housing can be/should be loaned to the lease holder for the duration of

the term of the land being used.

 

14. Excess land not farmed by oxen can be farmed using tractors, as long as

there is always sufficient land kept available for use of new ox farmers.

 

15. Tractor land should be rented at the same rate as that found locally,

renewable on a yearly/fixed period basis

 

ys

syamasundara dasa

Bhaktivedanta Manor

 

 

Madhava Gosh wrote:

 

> [Text 2826485 from COM]

>

> Dear Prabhus,

> Balabhadra Prabhu suggested I submit something just to get the ball roling

> on land reform. Here we go. Please give your comments and ideas. Madhava

> Ghosh, Rohita, Hare krishna dd, etc etc

 

I am making comments here on the fly, Also, I am not implying Syamasundara

was completely off just because I make a

lot of comments. He clearly stated he throw something out, walked teh

point,

just to get something going.

 

>

>

> 1. Any devotee who has agricultural experience, or can demonstrate his

> ability to grow crops can lease ISKCON land.

 

The definition of devotee could create problems here. For instance, we all

know devotees who think if you don't go to mangala arotik every day, you

aren't

a devotee. Then you could get into the staunch devotee but he is a rittvik,

whatever.

 

Agricultural experience these days in the West means primarily agribusiness.

 

Any initiated devotee (?????) with agricultural experience or having gone

through an agricultural apprenticeship, who will grow crops using small

scale

low impact methods....

 

>

>

> 2. All land must be fully utilised.

>

 

Well, I can look at forest land and see it as fully utilized if selective

timbering is going on, someone else may see it and say it isn't fully

utilized

if it isn't cleared and growing crops. I have a lawn around my house,

someone

may say that it should be garden and is not fully utilized as a lawn.

Pasture

versus confinement and intensive cropping .

 

When they did the homesteading out West in America, each homesteader got

160

acres. They had 5 years to build a house and have 5 acres under

cultivation.

 

In West Virginia, in order to qualify for agricultural status on your land

for

favorable real estate tax status(saves me a lot of money)., you have to

produce $1000 worth of crops a year. Produce for self consumption,

firewood,

etc all counts towards it. That $1000 figure hasn't been adjusted for

inflation

for quite some time.

 

Even yesterday, I was working on a terrace to have ready to garden next

spring, expanding my operation. the first couple of years on the land,

full

utilization may be unrealistic. The first year I planted perennials and

trees,

and am now able to expand as those are more established.

 

But I have chunks of ground that aren't fenced, aren't planted, and aren't

forest. I have eventual plans, but who knows when I get to it. "All land"

would mean 1000 sq feet out of 2 acres and I'm under utilising.

 

>

> 3.Any land not being used for agriculture or cow protection can be

reclaimed

> by the land holder with 6 months notice. The tenant must submit a plan of

> land use to the land holder management and the minister of agriculture and

> cow protection if they disagree with the decision. They must be able to

use

> the land within 6 months of notice of reclamation.

>

 

Suppose as a brahmacary, spmeone shared a straight razor with an HCV

carrier

and now has Hepatitis C. The best treatment currently available is one year

of

interferon/ribaviran which has serious side effects, meaning for a year he

can't work. 6 months isn't even one whole cycle.

 

>

> 4.Any leased land can be passed down to children or dependants as long as

> the ISKCON rules governing agriculture are maintained.

 

Lease is assignable to family, I'd need more definition on dependents.

 

>

>

> 5. Land is leased dependant on agricultural and cow protection practice

and

> not on sadhana requirements

>

> 6. Land is leased at the rate of 10% of produce, or financial equivalent,

as

> chosen by lease holder. This figure will apply for 3 years after which it

> can be negotiated in consulatation with the lease holder, the land holder

> and the ministery of agriculture and cow protection.

>

 

That is scary, but you address it in the next point I guess. This letting

someone on for reduced amount early so they can get established is in

general

a

good idea.

 

>

> 7. The maximum lease rate will not exceed 25% of produce.

 

In West Virginia, for established fruit orchards, the rate is 5%. Also,

it

needs to be clearly stated what the trustee of the land trust is going to do

in

exchange for the 25%. That would include at minimum paying the land taxes.

What about if the vaisya is extremely successful in finding some niche

market,

and comes under income tax pressure. Will the income tax be paid out of the

25%? In that ideal Vedic culture, that 25% included all taxes, which as

mere

islands in a larger society, we will still be liable for. What about fire

insurance on the house?

 

> 8. All land will be farmed using oxen. No machinery can be used which

> replaces the oxen.

>

 

Little harsh, cuts me right out. The barn on my place was caved in when I

got

it. Although I would like to replace it, the money doesn't exist. so to

get

oxen, first I need to fix the barn. If you make an emphasis on oxen

being

used, then the land would minimum need to come equipped to have oxen,

which

means adequate pasturage and a barn. BArn building and new fencing are

capital

expenditures that would have to be in place prior to taking possession of

the

land if oxen is a requirement.

 

What if someone has a need for a 1/2 acre for self feeding, and a 1/2 acre

for

cash crop/bartering. To require oxen useage would make it unrealistic for

such

a person.

 

If a teamster was available for hire, then it may more realistically be

specificed that the oxen need to be hired in preference to a tractor. Or

you

could make some prohibition on tractor ownership, or some adjusting

schedule ,

say for the first 5 years not required to use oxen.

 

I appreciate the principle behind requiring oxen, but if we put the bar too

high, no one will be able to get over it.

 

>

> 9. Oxen should be kept by the tenant

>

> 10. Oxen can be loaned/rented from the local goshala if available

 

How about hiring teamsters who specilize in keeping oxen?

 

>

>

> 11. All land farmed according to the following principles:

> No manufactured fertilizers/blood based fertilisers

 

If the local municipality composts leaves and yard debris and sells it,

would

I

be unable to buy and use that? Would that be considered manufactured? >

> No pesticides used

 

Rotonone is an organic insecticide. Would that be prohibited?

 

>

> No herbicdes used

>

> 12. Working the land should be no less than 75% of the lease holders

> livelihood

>

 

Cuts me out. Although the majority of my time is spent on the land, it is

a

small minority of my income. I really am thinking this is too

unrealistic.

 

>

> 13. Housing can be/should be loaned to the lease holder for the duration

of

> the term of the land being used.

>

 

This is really crucial. If having to move on the land, housing has to be

built

first, it really cuts into the first few years energy. If the 25% includes

housing or not is a major issue.

 

>

> 14. Excess land not farmed by oxen can be farmed using tractors, as long

as

> there is always sufficient land kept available for use of new ox farmers.

>

 

I assume you are refering here to the remainder of land not leased.

 

>

> 15. Tractor land should be rented at the same rate as that found locally,

> renewable on a yearly/fixed period basis

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Visit us on the WEB at : http://www.iscowp.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...