nostradamus

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

 

A devotee just sent this to me about Nostradamus:

 

It looks like Nostradamus called it right.

Now his books will sell big time.

The "3rd big war" part don't sound too unlikely either.

 

 

 

"In the year of the new century and nine months,

>From the sky will come a great King of Terror...

The sky will burn at forty-five degrees.

Fire approaches the great new city..."

In the city of York there will be a great collapse,

2 twin brothers torn apart by chaos while the

fortress fall the great leader will succumb,

the third big war will begin when the big city is

burning

- NOSTRADAMUS

 

 

2001 is the first year of the new century and

this is the 9th month.

New York is located at the 41st degree Latitude.

 

Niscala:

There seems to be an alarming lack of protest at the thought of going to

war. Now the casualties are in the thousands. Do we want them to be in the

millions? Bush is trying it seems to make it a world war, by asking the

other nations of the world to assist him in the "fight against terror". Our

own PM has promised him Australia will assist.

 

Can't America and the other nations see the possible ramifications of this?

It seems they are hell-bent on revenge. And they are justifying it as a war

against terrorism. What about the terror that their war will bring?

 

Bush is justifying his getting the other nations involved by saying that

terrorism is common to all nations. But it has never been a big problem here

or in America before this either. They are playing on the suffering of the

victims and the victims families. What about the innocent victims in the

upcoming war, which will almost certainly dwarf the damage done so far?

 

Violence may be justified against a person who attacks and threatens life.

But the type of war we have these days in the age of nuclear warheads simply

means that on a large scale, it cannot be an option. There should be no more

calling of other nations to assist, thus ensuring that the revenge for those

killed already will get completely out of control, and kill many millions of

innocent people.

 

Maybe do away witrh the planet altogether.

 

What would be an appropriate response? At the very last resort, that only

the countries involved go to war, which seems to be America and Afghanistan.

The latter is not a nuclear power, and so even the threat of it, would make

them cough up Bin Laden, which they are indicating they are going to do

anyway. Then once they have co-operated in stamping out terrorism, what is

the need for war?

 

How can they be sure that governments are involved in this terrorist attack

anyway? Afghanistan said they do not support it. It seems revenge is making

America blind, and they are rationalizing it in so many ways. And unless the

people in democratic countries make a massive protest against war, their

governments will go on ahead and destroy them.

 

Revenge is the thing that has kept bloody violence continuing in the world.

It may have been possible in the vedic age where only willing and eager

ksatriyas are involved in the fight. But there is no possiblity for revenge

in this age, because we have made a technology so horribly powerful, that it

can destroy far more than the aggressors. For every aggressor killed there

are millions of innocents. Do we want that?

 

ys, Niscala

 

 

_______________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp