Guest guest Posted September 24, 2001 Report Share Posted September 24, 2001 haribol prabhus, pamho agtsp I feel a little inappropriate making a comment after an extended absence and an acknowledged disillusionment of the 'reality' of farm development here. I vouch that Balabhadra and Chayadevi's position is not the exception but rather the norm in farm communities. We too have to earn money from jobs to keep our service in cow protection and on the land. And this is at a very basic level. It is ironic that there is discussion of selling farms in a more desparate material world, rather than try to not only keep but to expand ISKCON farm communities. However it's not just GBC, it's everyone who needs to look at this. We sold land here to devotees who really put decent plans forward to work the land, but very little has been done with it. I accept that money has a huge part to play in development, but we are not rich or well off, but still gradually we are developing. This shifts the emphasis to commitment and continuous energy invested into projects. We currently have a transient culture in ISKCON and this does not assist in rural development. An example would be the karmi 'farm relief service', whereby a farmer who is normally engaged 365 days a year, can take time away while the work continues. We do not have that continuous practice to the degree necessary for worldwide rural development or cow protection.We don't currently need relief services as an alternate rural occupation because nobody wants to do it in the first place let alone relieve anyone.I experienced this in three staggering cases. Firstly myself, husband or family had never been to India. We went for the one and only time in 1997 but had to pay somebody to look after the temple cows when we went for three weeks after twently years plus of service. The person was gone when we came back and another devotee there in their place with a holier than thou attitude as if we had done something wrong. The arrangement was made with a person living on Temple property otherwise we would not have made the arrangement. Then last year my husband was incapacitated for three weeks in winter, no assistance came, this year it was three months, no assistance came. Farm and cow services are continuous, all day, every day, 365 days a year. It's not glamorous and really only hits the limelight when we preach about land use and cow protection to others. I can personally say that some devotees here wouldn't know how many cows we have, their name or approximate age. In a very small community that's not a good sign. Presently our farm is like a ghost town. There is very little energy here because there is an absence of not only men during the week, but even matajis out doing a bit of weeding etc. with children. And here is the crux of the problem, the children. If children do not learn these skills and a service atttitude from their parents, they too become transient. The cycle repeats itself. Most young farmers have learned the skills over the course of their childhood but ours are not. This does not mean that they naturally will always farm, but at least they should be able to. My own son does not, he is a Hari Nama devotee, but he had the skills to return to assist the cow protection when my husband was ill. It's not his nature, but he can earth up the potatoes. There is an awful uncertainty here now, even for ourselves as we cannot plan long term development because we don't know what will happen, but by that time it could well be too late. We should consider this. If energy is low now before a crisis, who will have the skills or know how in times of crisis? Our community has no athmosphere, no life, no energy and these are necessary to form the basis of rural development. On the opposite side, karmi farmers all around the country are putting rural development groups together while we are becomming stagnant. I feel that the best example we can look to is Queen Kunti who prayed 'let these calamities happen again and again', because it seems that devotees need a threat of some impending danger to see the obvious and that is that Srila Prabhupada wanted rural communities to set examples of a proper lifestyle and it was to go hand in hand with all the other recognised front line preaching methods. Not since Y2K has there been any interest from devotees about getting things together, buying food etc. Personally I'm a bit sick of it, although I appreciate that at least for that time it's happening. On a very limited budget our place is coming together, not great but it produces some food and enough flowers for Their Lordships six months of the year - weather permitting. It's not just in crisis times, but we have to buy in bulk to save money so there is always some food there, and if push came to shove we'd eek out a living. I fear for devotees more than the general mass of society, because we are meant to have this knowledge and act upon it, they are going on in blissful ignorance. If again this horrible instance makes devotees think of implementing Srila Prabhupada's teachings regarding rural development, then that is good, but I hope it's not so quickly lost as it was after the Y2K thing. I am so sorry for the rant, but it really needs to be addressed worldwide. It should be implicit in the training of young devotees, and certainly we need to have it recognised as a preaching method in it's own right. Then we can embrace those people who seek shelter when they need to, but rural communities should not become the plan B option in times of world crisis. We should be acknowledged as a vital part of Srila Prabhupada's plan all the time. I think devotees would have a hard time looking after themselves without opening the gates to others, although this of course would be the higher standard. ys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.