Guest guest Posted November 16, 2001 Report Share Posted November 16, 2001 Haribol pabhus, pamho agtsp Looks fine to me, I'm not sure about the funding proposals to ISKCON as it's been a rarity in my lifetime, but it may be no harm to also flesh out by supporting materials or if you can fit it into the required slot. This should be a concise breakdown of the different packages outlining what supportive measures you have, funding, joint funding or funding in kind such as not only the home office but numbers of personnel involvement at present etc. But looks reasonable overall. If on the other hand they offer the bottom minimum requested, whereas better than you have now, it may be that you offer them a staggered increase rather than a staggered decrease. If things are tight they (funders in general) tend to look at doing some little to assist. Whereas by offering an ascending option, at least if they can't make it all this year, it should be approved to implement over three years reaching a maximum. This way you don't have to fight this same case next year and the year after. Hope this helps ys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.