Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 ALL Thumbs BOOK REVIEWS (Coburn Press, 2002) Review by Sally Fallon This is a practical guide to keeping a family milk cow, including instructions for milking, feeding and dealing with health problems. But even if you are not interested or able to keep a family cow, Grohman's book is worth the price of admission for the first two chapters alone, in which she describes the position of the cow in history and vents on the decline in quality of the modern food supply. To those who insist that a plant-based food system is the way to a better world, Grohman begs to differ: "To produce grain in useful quantities requires rich flat land such as flood plains. It requires a huge amount of energy, available in antiquity only where complex cultures had developed. This energy was provided by slaves. The more slaves you had, the more grain you could grow. And the more grain you could grow, the more slaves you could afford, thus giving rise to a wealthy class able to afford monumental tombs and other durable artifacts of civilization. . . ". . . To herd animals requires only the availability of shepherds and can be done on any kind of land from rocky mountain sides to kelp strewn beaches. Wherever herbivores have been herded, their milk as well as their meat became important parts of the diet. Herbivores form grass, bushes and weeds into high-grade, readily available food. They do this with enormous efficiency, whether in captivity or not. But when herded, they free up a great deal of human time for other pursuits. Humans with extra time and energy tend to engage in commerce, the arts, invention and war, not necessarily in that order. Dairying has played its part in these pursuits." Unlike other domestic animals who readily revert to feral conditions (pigs, goats and sheep), the cow requires humans for her survival. In return, cows provide humans with the basis of wealth. "Cattle are the original stock in stockmarket. Ownership of cattle has always been a mark of wealth." People who create wealth with a cow are "hard working and reliable," which are not necessarily the characteristics of those in ancient times who created wealth through the cultivation of grains. The cow ". . . can support a family. She not only turns grass into milk in quantities sufficient to feed a family but also provides extra to sell and she contributes yearly a calf to rear or fatten. The by-products from cheesemaking (whey) and from butter (buttermilk) will support a pig or two. Her manure improves her pasture and when dug into the garden, results in plant growth that cannot be surpassed by other growth mediums. The family that takes good care of its cow is well off. "The over-arching truth about the cow is that she drives the domestic or small farm economy. By living on a constantly renewing resource, grass, she is able to support not just herself and her calf, but your pig and your chickens (neither of which can live on grass) and still provide milk for the house. The reverse is never true. No pigs or chickens or any other non grazing animals can live on grass or support another animal." Grohman's description of the milk commerce in the later part of the 19th century—an emphasis on cleanliness at the farm, milk trains from rural areas to the cities, blocks of ice to keep the milk cool—contains a fascinating tidbit. In the winter of 1886, the lakes didn't freeze. Without fresh ice, dairy farmers were forced to sell their milk to middlemen. "They have never been able to regain control over their own product," says Grohman, (at least not until recently with the advent of direct farm sales and cow share programs). This loss of control helped usher in the era of pasteurization, a necessary step when fresh milk is pooled and transported great distances. Pasteurization, says Grohman, was instituted for the benefit of distributors. Is the family cow an anachronism? Can there be any economic benefit to keeping a family cow? For a family with small children and a little bit of land, the answer is yes. Instead of joining the rat race and paying for childcare, Mom can stay home with the children. The cow provides a good portion of the family food, the children will need minimal health care, the orthodontist budget will be zero, and with a bit of enterprise a value-added product like butter or cheese can provide some supplemental income. The family may even come out ahead financially, and Mom will maintain her health so that she can join the job market, should she choose to do so, at a later time. And if you decide to keep a family cow, Grohman's provides a highly readable how-to manual. --------- ----- This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Summer 2003 This page was posted on 12/07/03 HOME The Weston A. Price Foundation, PMB 106-380, 4200 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20016 Phone: 202.333.HEAL, Email: WestonAPrice (AT) msn (DOT) com , Web: http://www.westonaprice.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 - "Hrimati (dd) ACBSP (Mayapur - IN)" <Hrimati.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT) net> Monday, January 5, 2004 9:11 am Does anyone has a copy of this book? > ALL Thumbs BOOK REVIEWS > > (Coburn Press, 2002) > > Review by Sally Fallon > > This is a practical guide to keeping a family milk cow, including > instructions for milking, feeding and dealing with health > problems. But > even if you are not interested or able to keep a family cow, > Grohman's book > is worth the price of admission for the first two chapters alone, > in which > she describes the position of the cow in history and vents on the > declinein quality of the modern food supply. > > To those who insist that a plant-based food system is the way to a > betterworld, Grohman begs to differ: "To produce grain in useful > quantitiesrequires rich flat land such as flood plains. It > requires a huge amount of > energy, available in antiquity only where complex cultures had > developed.This energy was provided by slaves. The more slaves you > had, the more grain > you could grow. And the more grain you could grow, the more slaves you > could afford, thus giving rise to a wealthy class able to afford > monumentaltombs and other durable artifacts of civilization. . . > > ". . . To herd animals requires only the availability of shepherds > and can > be done on any kind of land from rocky mountain sides to kelp strewn > beaches. Wherever herbivores have been herded, their milk as well > as their > meat became important parts of the diet. Herbivores form grass, > bushes and > weeds into high-grade, readily available food. They do this with > enormousefficiency, whether in captivity or not. But when herded, > they free up a > great deal of human time for other pursuits. Humans with extra > time and > energy tend to engage in commerce, the arts, invention and war, not > necessarily in that order. Dairying has played its part in these > pursuits." > Unlike other domestic animals who readily revert to feral > conditions (pigs, > goats and sheep), the cow requires humans for her survival. In > return, cows > provide humans with the basis of wealth. "Cattle are the original > stock in > stockmarket. Ownership of cattle has always been a mark of > wealth." People > who create wealth with a cow are "hard working and reliable," > which are not > necessarily the characteristics of those in ancient times who created > wealth through the cultivation of grains. > > The cow ". . . can support a family. She not only turns grass into > milk in > quantities sufficient to feed a family but also provides extra to > sell and > she contributes yearly a calf to rear or fatten. The by-products from > cheesemaking (whey) and from butter (buttermilk) will support a > pig or two. > Her manure improves her pasture and when dug into the garden, > results in > plant growth that cannot be surpassed by other growth mediums. The > familythat takes good care of its cow is well off. > > "The over-arching truth about the cow is that she drives the > domestic or > small farm economy. By living on a constantly renewing resource, > grass, she > is able to support not just herself and her calf, but your pig and > yourchickens (neither of which can live on grass) and still > provide milk for > the house. The reverse is never true. No pigs or chickens or any > other non > grazing animals can live on grass or support another animal." Sounds like a lady with an agenda. I'm not sure that her historical analysis is very sound. As far as I know, there has been only one agricultural system which depended solely on slaves, and that was the Romans. Everyone else used some sort of animal traction. But the real reason why there is no historical example of a vegan society (as opposed to individual adult vegans) is that in former times they would have all died of vitamin B6 deficiency -- which is naturally present only in animals sources, such as meat, milk and eggs. In modern times vitamin B6 can be provided through seaweed and certain special yeast products. But before the late 20th century, such technology was not known. This is the real reason that there are no historical examples of vegan society -- not the questionable analysis she presents above. ys hkdd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 > Sounds like a lady with an agenda. I'm not sure that her historical analysis > is very sound. As far as I know, there has been only one agricultural system > which depended solely on slaves, and that was the Romans. Everyone else used > some sort of animal traction. Excuse me? Have you studied US history? Agriculture was based on slaves and its variant, indentured servants. > died of vitamin B6 deficiency -- which is naturally present only in animals > sources, such as meat, milk and eggs. B12 , incidentally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 - Mark Middle Mountain <gourdmad (AT) ovnet (DOT) com> Monday, January 5, 2004 2:07 pm Re: Does anyone has a copy of this book? > > > > Sounds like a lady with an agenda. I'm not sure that her historical > analysis > > is very sound. As far as I know, there has been only one > agriculturalsystem > > which depended solely on slaves, and that was the Romans. > Everyone else > used > > some sort of animal traction. > > Excuse me? Have you studied US history? Agriculture was based on > slaves and its variant, indentured servants. I guess I thought she meant using humans as a source of agricultural power (instead of draft animals) which was done at a late period of Roman history. I'm also thinking of Sir Albert Howard: "No permanent or effective system of agriculture has every been devised without the animal. Many attempts have been made, but sooner or later they break down. The replacement of live stock by artificials is always followed by disease the moment the original store of soil fertility is exhausted." (An Agricultural Testament) I guess I'm not sure what she's getting at here. Is she proposing a diet which does not include any grains? That sounds fairly radical. What are her historical examples? The Innuit? The Masai? > > died of vitamin B6 deficiency -- which is naturally present only in > animals > > sources, such as meat, milk and eggs. > > B12 , incidentally. Right - B6 and B12. ys hkdd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2004 Report Share Posted January 5, 2004 Islamic countries in the Mid-East had always (until very recently-[the 1960's in Saudi Arabia]) used slavery as well. -Gopal - In a message dated 1/5/2004 1:20:25 PM Central Standard Time, gourdmad (AT) ovnet (DOT) com writes: > Sounds like a lady with an agenda. I'm not sure that her historical analysis > is very sound. As far as I know, there has been only one agricultural system > which depended solely on slaves, and that was the Romans. Everyone else used > some sort of animal traction. Excuse me? Have you studied US history? Agriculture was based on slaves and its variant, indentured servants. > died of vitamin B6 deficiency -- which is naturally present only in animals > sources, such as meat, milk and eggs. B12 , incidentally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.