Guest guest Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Krsna is being so kind to them, publicizing the fact that beef is safe. Unfortunately, they don't have a higher taste, so they continue eating it -- incurring both health risk and karmic risk. ys hkdd ******************************* New York Times Madness of Untested Beef April 14, 2004 To the Editor: Re "U.S. Won't Let Company Test All Its Cattle for Mad Cow" (news article, April 10): Is this government bureaucracy gone amok or simply another example of the failure of public servants to protect the interests of the American public? How can testing of all cattle for mad cow disease, a potentially fatal illness, be bad for consumers? Contrary to what the National Cattlemen's Beef Association says, the most important thing is not the potential false impression that untested beef is not safe but rather the truthful understanding that tested beef is not infected. What a perversion of the free-market system and what an example of a government agency's pandering to an industry group at the expense of the health of all Americans. NORMAN OKSMAN Katonah, N.Y., April 12, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/14/opinion/L14COWW.html?ex=1082952153&ei=1&en=dd 9d3ddfd7dc8428 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Noma Petroff wrote: >Krsna is being so kind to them, publicizing the fact that beef is safe. > I mean "unsafe"! ys hkdd > >Unfortunately, they don't have a higher taste, so they continue eating it -- >incurring both health risk and karmic risk. > >ys > >hkdd > >******************************* > >New York Times > > >Madness of Untested Beef > >April 14, 2004 > > > > >To the Editor: > >Re "U.S. Won't Let Company Test All Its Cattle for Mad Cow" >(news article, April 10): > > >Is this government bureaucracy gone amok or simply another >example of the failure of public servants to protect the >interests of the American public? > > >How can testing of all cattle for mad cow disease, a >potentially fatal illness, be bad for consumers? > > >Contrary to what the National Cattlemen's Beef Association >says, the most important thing is not the potential false >impression that untested beef is not safe but rather the >truthful understanding that tested beef is not infected. > > >What a perversion of the free-market system and what an >example of a government agency's pandering to an industry >group at the expense of the health of all Americans. > > >NORMAN OKSMAN >Katonah, N.Y., April 12, 2004 > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/14/opinion/L14COWW.html?ex=1082952153&ei=1&en=d d >9d3ddfd7dc8428 > > > > > > > >----------------------- >To from this mailing list, send an email to: >Cow-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.