Guest guest Posted August 30, 1999 Report Share Posted August 30, 1999 The point is: **The requirement for the GBC's to visit ISKCON's Farms, meet with the cowherds and submit reports to the Ministry of Cow Protection and Agriculture is for the purpose of protecting Krsna's cows.** If this Minimum Standard is not met, Lord Krsna's cows will be abused. And it will be very inauspicious for the residents and the GBC of the community in question. Even if they do, if they only meet with the farm manager, and he assures the GBC, all is well, and if the complaints about cow abuse are just ignored, with the focus being on criticizing the complainers as being not in a position to complain as they have no official position then you have what's happened here...nothing your servant, Niscala dasi P.S.This farm manager, our sole cowherd, since everyone else is banned or discouraged, when asked how many total in the herd, said 59, but I knew for a fact there was 76, and knew the break-up into dry cows, bullocks, etc. I put this into a report and gave it to trhe authorities. Now these people have put out their own report, using my statistics, not explaining about the vastly different original estimate. They do not check on the cows, they have never checked, and that is why we have had so many disappear, become injured, go down and die, etc., etc. Still, personally I am banned from checking on them, due to the farm manager being extremely violent to me, and doing great damage to my property, while I was taking up caring for them before. ____ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 1999 Report Share Posted August 30, 1999 Niscala prabhu, what farm are you writing from? your servant, Hare Krsna dasi Noelene Hawkins wrote: > [Text 2591135 from COM] > > The point is: **The requirement for the GBC's to visit ISKCON's Farms, meet > with the cowherds and submit reports to the Ministry of Cow Protection and > Agriculture is for the purpose of protecting Krsna's cows.** If this > Minimum > Standard is not met, Lord Krsna's cows will be abused. And it will be very > inauspicious for the residents and the GBC of the community in question. > > Even if they do, if they only meet with the farm manager, and he assures the > GBC, all is well, and if the complaints about cow abuse are just ignored, > with the focus being on criticizing the complainers as being not in a > position to complain as they have no official position then you have what's > happened here...nothing > > your servant, > > Niscala dasi > > P.S.This farm manager, our sole cowherd, since everyone else is banned or > discouraged, when asked how many total in the herd, said 59, but I knew for > a fact there was 76, and knew the break-up into dry cows, bullocks, etc. I > put this into a report and gave it to trhe authorities. Now these people > have put out their own report, using my statistics, not explaining about the > vastly different original estimate. They do not check on the cows, they have > never checked, and that is why we have had so many disappear, become > injured, go down and die, etc., etc. Still, personally I am banned from > checking on them, due to the farm manager being extremely violent to me, and > doing great damage to my property, while I was taking up caring for them > before. > > ____ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 1999 Report Share Posted August 30, 1999 Again, this seems to point to the need to list each cow by name and age, so that quarterly reports can be compared and discrepencies will stand out easily. your servant, Hare Krsna dasi Noelene Hawkins wrote: > [Text 2591135 from COM] > > The point is: **The requirement for the GBC's to visit ISKCON's Farms, meet > with the cowherds and submit reports to the Ministry of Cow Protection and > Agriculture is for the purpose of protecting Krsna's cows.** If this > Minimum > Standard is not met, Lord Krsna's cows will be abused. And it will be very > inauspicious for the residents and the GBC of the community in question. > > Even if they do, if they only meet with the farm manager, and he assures the > GBC, all is well, and if the complaints about cow abuse are just ignored, > with the focus being on criticizing the complainers as being not in a > position to complain as they have no official position then you have what's > happened here...nothing > > your servant, > > Niscala dasi > > P.S.This farm manager, our sole cowherd, since everyone else is banned or > discouraged, when asked how many total in the herd, said 59, but I knew for > a fact there was 76, and knew the break-up into dry cows, bullocks, etc. I > put this into a report and gave it to trhe authorities. Now these people > have put out their own report, using my statistics, not explaining about the > vastly different original estimate. They do not check on the cows, they have > never checked, and that is why we have had so many disappear, become > injured, go down and die, etc., etc. Still, personally I am banned from > checking on them, due to the farm manager being extremely violent to me, and > doing great damage to my property, while I was taking up caring for them > before. > > ____ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 1999 Report Share Posted August 30, 1999 haribol. Just testing to see if we are back on line. Noelene Hawkins <niscala99 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> COM: Cow (Protection and related issues) <Cow (AT) bbt (DOT) se> Sunday, August 29, 1999 11:41 PM GBC inspections, a farce. >[Text 2591135 from COM] > >The point is: **The requirement for the GBC's to visit ISKCON's Farms, meet >with the cowherds and submit reports to the Ministry of Cow Protection and >Agriculture is for the purpose of protecting Krsna's cows.** If this >Minimum >Standard is not met, Lord Krsna's cows will be abused. And it will be very >inauspicious for the residents and the GBC of the community in question. > > >Even if they do, if they only meet with the farm manager, and he assures the >GBC, all is well, and if the complaints about cow abuse are just ignored, >with the focus being on criticizing the complainers as being not in a >position to complain as they have no official position then you have what's >happened here...nothing > >your servant, > >Niscala dasi > >P.S.This farm manager, our sole cowherd, since everyone else is banned or >discouraged, when asked how many total in the herd, said 59, but I knew for >a fact there was 76, and knew the break-up into dry cows, bullocks, etc. I >put this into a report and gave it to trhe authorities. Now these people >have put out their own report, using my statistics, not explaining about the >vastly different original estimate. They do not check on the cows, they have >never checked, and that is why we have had so many disappear, become >injured, go down and die, etc., etc. Still, personally I am banned from >checking on them, due to the farm manager being extremely violent to me, and >doing great damage to my property, while I was taking up caring for them >before. > > >____ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.