Guest guest Posted January 12, 2002 Report Share Posted January 12, 2002 Haribol prabhus, pamho agtsp sorry for the absence but I've been keeping track although having difficulties contributing. Breaking down the plan into elements seems the best approach. I think in environmental we need to look at these issues but also allow for 'externals'. These would include working within the scope of the base local enviornmental structure. For instance there is a limit to how much improvement can be done in this area at Govindadvipa. Some is permitted but we are very restricted by EU and government policy. Therefore the environmental aspect must factor in the working of agri/horticulture suitable to conditions or area specific. There is a lot of arguments that if you want to grow you should pick perfect or the best land. We didn't, the temple is here and we have to deal with it. So this may also be the case for other devotee complexes. If it is, then we must take a broader view of environmental to ensure success. Otherwise we may have a great plan which won't essentially help those in situ. Regarding improvements, off site additives of reliable sources can be used but they must be weighted against the economics of using them. It's bestto place emphasis on what we can do ourselves or have a strategy of lessening the dependance on such products over time. Enrichment can be used with green manuring, composting etc. using appropriate local materials. Where possible we should look to externalise the plan by introducing a 'co-operative' mood of accessing good materials with partners or through cluster group trading of soil conditioners. This will be relative to the size of plot but for small projects the mainstay should be home produced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.