Guest guest Posted October 18, 2000 Report Share Posted October 18, 2000 My understanding is that 10 tonnes of Farm yard mnaure is a rough average per acre for vegetables, grass or grain. Potatoes would be very happy with 20 tonnes of manure per acre. ys syam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2000 Report Share Posted October 18, 2000 10 tons per acre of manure will acidify soil, 20 tons be neutral and 30 tons raise pH. Fresh manure applied to potatoes can cause scab. "Syamasundara (das) (Bhaktivedanta Manor - UK)" wrote: > My understanding is that 10 tonnes of Farm yard mnaure is a rough average > per acre for vegetables, grass or grain. Potatoes would be very happy with > 20 tonnes of manure per acre. > > ys syam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2001 Report Share Posted March 14, 2001 >My understanding is that 10 tonnes of Farm yard mnaure is a rough average >per acre for vegetables, grass or grain. Potatoes would be very happy with >20 tonnes of manure per acre. >ys syam Mark Middle Mountain wrote: >Fresh manure applied to potatoes can cause scab. That's probably why we have got it at Bhaktivedanta Manor. - We have also had tomato failure in the polytunnel this year (no compost applied) My understanding comes from the great agronomist, botanist, mycologist, economist and director of the institute of plant industry, Indore and the chief agricultural advisor to the central states of India and Rajputana - who was knighted for his work - Sir Albert Howard. [also cause of the fornmation of the Soil Association in Great Britain (and subsequently the world) which was formed by Lady Eve Balfour and Friend Sykes who were both eminent authors in the same school as Howard. There were nine editions of the wrok The Living Soil.] He (Howard) stated that in 40 B.C. Varro drew attention to the great importance of the complete decay of manure before it was applied to the land. To bring this about, the manure heap, during the period of storage, had to be kept in the right conditions....In A.D. 90 Columella emphasized the importance of constructing pits (in which the farmyard manure was stored) in such a manner that drying out was impossible.. comment by Radha Krsna das. This pit system was was to preserve moisture (in hot climates). In the UK and similar climates the right conditions are also necessary IE, the reverse conditions. The heaps have to be kept dry enough etc.etc. This is not done in the European farming system and is a mistake. There is complete imbalance in the manure heaps of the west for the following reasons: 1. too much moisture 2. too little air 3. no consideration to carbon nitrogen balance. 4. the lack of management, which is mentioned in an article by Radha Krsna das to the current Soil Association magazine entitled 'Organic Farming' (December, 1999). Therefore you have a vastly inferior end product/resulting in scab, blight, eel worm, wire worm, mildew, lodging etc. you name it. Columella went on to say: that there is a need to turn this material in summer to facilitate decay, and suggested that ripened manure should always be used for corn, while the fresh material could safely be applied to grass land. The Roamns, therefore, not only understood the importatnce of organic matter in crop production but had gone a long way towards mastering the principle that, to obtain the best results, it is necessary to arrange for the decay of farmyard manure (FYM) before it is applied to arrable land. It is interesting to turn from the writings of the ancients to the account of the syposium of 'Soil Organic Matter and Green Manuring' arranged by the American Society of Agronomy at Washington D.C. on the 22nd November 1928, the main results of which appeared in the journal of the American Society of Agronomy of October 1929. Without exception, the investigators who took part in this conference laid the greatest emphasis on the importance of keeping up the supply of organic matter in the soil, and on discovering the most effective and most econnomical method of doing this under various conditions, as regards moisture, which the soils of the United States present. During the 2,000 years which have elapsed since Varro wrote in in 40 B.C. and the American investigators met in 1928, there has occurred only one brief period in which the role of organic matter was to some extent forgotten. This took place after LEIBIG'S 'Chemistry in it's Application to to Agriculture and Physiology' first appeared in 1840. In which he suggested that organic matter (in the right condition) was of little consequence and that due to his discovery of the true origin of the carbon of plants..and that of the Rothamstead experiment station (at Harpenden,UK) views have since been held by the majoritory of agricultural chemists that all that matters in obtaining maximum yields is the addition of so many pounds of nitrogen, phosphorous and pottassium to the acre (NPK). The great development of the artificial manure industry has followed as a matter of course. May I suggest that you, Syamasundar prabhu, while not taking the advice of the modern agricultural chemists in applying artificial manure, you are however, following somewhat knowingly or unknowingly, in the wake of the line of the Leibig school, and not adhering to the advice of the ancients and more recenlty the expertise of the more modern day organic farming authors, who founded the Soil Association; a member of which you are seeking to become. Howard said in (1930) that properly made cpompost was 4 times more valuable that Farm Yard Manure. (This I consider, today, to be an understatement, for the discovery of the health/immunity issue from food derived from compost, or properly fertile soil, and the retail potential was not written about until much later.) In todays terms (2000) properly made compost or growing media is worth £400 a ton (retail) and FYM about? £10.00 per ton wholesale. It is not sold retail. This figure may vary from farmer to farmer but in Kingls Langley, U.K. it's this price. The whole of the soil association was consequently formed and changes were to be effected... How can a "farmer" ignore these facts when they are presented to him..with the results that have been published as well. The answer may take pages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.