Guest guest Posted September 27, 1999 Report Share Posted September 27, 1999 "COM: Madhava Gosh (das) ACBSP (New Vrindavan - USA)" wrote: > [Text 2658156 from COM] > > > Thus I find trying to speak of Krishna more practical for me > > than speaking of cow protection or any other thing in the category of aropa > > siddhi bhakti. > > How is cow protection not related to Krishna? He was a cowherd boy. Thank you, Madhava Gosh prabhu, for correcting this common mistake. In one sense, other religions are poverty stricken because they do not acknowledge that cow protection is essential for spiritual progress. But, members of ISKCON should not be poverty stricken in this regard, because Srila Prabhupada has informed us that it is not possible to make spiritual advancement without protecting the cows. The Bhagavatam backs him up completely. I am also sending a blind copy of this to "cow" and the women's conference so that they will see the quote without being cluttered with our subsequent comments. Devotees who wish to discuss this further are welcomed to join the varnasrama conference. your servant, Hare Krsna dasi ******************************************************** The brahmanas, the cows and the defenseless creatures are My own body. Those whose faculty of judgment has been impaired by their own sin look upon these as distinct from Me. They are just like furious serpents, and they are angrily torn apart by the bills of the vulturelike messengers of Yamaraja, the superintendent of sinful persons. PURPORT The defenseless creatures, according to Brahma-samhita, are the cows, brahmanas, women, children and old men. Of these five, the brahmanas and cows are especially mentioned in this verse because the Lord is always anxious about the benefit of the brahmanas and the cows and is prayed to in this way. The Lord especially instructs, therefore, that no one should be envious of these five, especially the cows and brahmanas. In some of the Bhagavatam readings, the word duhitrh is used instead of duhatih. But in either case, the meaning is the same. Duhatih means “cow,” and duhitrh can also be used to mean “cow” because the cow is supposed to be the daughter of the sun-god. Just as children are taken care of by the parents, women as a class should be taken care of by the father, husband or grown-up son. Those who are helpless must be taken care of by their respective guardians, otherwise the guardians will be subjected to the punishment of Yamaraja, who is appointed by the Lord to supervise the activities of sinful living creatures. The assistants, or messengers, of Yamaraja are likened here to vultures, and those who do not execute their respective duties in protecting their wards are compared to serpents. Vultures deal very seriously with serpents, and similarly the messengers will deal very seriously with neglectful guardians. SB 3.16.11 ============ REF. SB 3.16.11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.