Guest guest Posted June 29, 2001 Report Share Posted June 29, 2001 "Taraka (das) ACBSP (Gita Nagari, PA - USA)" wrote: > TRANSLATION > I am uncivilized and sinful due to my neglect of brahminical culture, God > consciousness and cow protection. Therefore I wish that my kingdom, strength > and riches burn up immediately by the fire of the brahmana's wrath so that > in the future I may not be guided by such inauspicious attitudes. > > PURPORT > Progressive human civilization is based on brahminical culture, God > consciousness and protection of cows. All economic development of the state > by trade, commerce, agriculture and industries must be fully utilized in > relation to the above principles, otherwise all so-called economic > development becomes a source of degradation. Cow protection means feeding > the brahminical culture, which leads towards God consciousness, and thus > perfection of human civilization is achieved. The age of Kali aims at > killing the higher principles of life, and although Maharaja Pariksit > strongly resisted the domination of the personality of Kali within the > world, the influence of the age of Kali came at an opportune moment, and > even a strong king like Maharaja Pariksit was induced to disregard the > brahminical culture due to a slight provocation of hunger and thirst. > Maharaja Pariksit lamented the accidental incident, and he desired that all > his kingdom, strength and accumulation of wealth would be burned up for not > being engaged in brahminical culture, etc. > > Where wealth and strength are not engaged in the advancement of brahminical > culture, God consciousness and cow protection, the state and home are surely > doomed by Providence. If we want peace and prosperity in the world, we > should take lessons from this verse; every state and every home must > endeavor to advance the cause of brahminical culture for self-purification, > God consciousness for self-realization and cow protection for getting > sufficient milk and the best food to continue a perfect civilization. > > >>> Ref. VedaBase => SB 1.19.3 This is one of the Bhagavatam's and Srila Prabhupada's most powerful statements on the importance of cow protection: Maharaja Pariksit states that because of his neglect of cow protection (and brahminical culture and God consciousness) he is uncivilized. Srila Prabhupada states that where wealth and strength are not engaged in the advancement of cow protection (and brahminical culture and God consciousness), the state and home are surely doomed by Providence. Again and again, when I see this quote I think of the neglect of cow protection in ISKCON -- especially the neglect of cow protection at ISKCON Vrndavana and ISKCON Mayapur, where according to Syamasundara prabhu's math (which seems quite logical to me) dozens and dozens of cows and bulls are missing over the last decade. Clearly ISKCON Vrndavana and ISKCON Mayapur have neglected cow protection. Just like the child abuse of the past, this neglect of cow protection starts right at the very top of the spiritual leadership of these communities, with devotees like Harikesa Swami, Jayapataka Swami and Gopal Krsna Goswami -- what to speak of the administrative leaders like the various temple presidents. It seems an unavoidable conclusion that these leaders drastically neglected to protect the cows in their projects. And even to this day, they do not investigate the crimes of the past with regard to cow protection. And, they do not make any meaningful public apology for the abuses to the cows, bulls and calves at their projects. Of course, Harikesa Swami has fallen -- but what of the other spiritual leaders who have neglected cow protection -- the big swamis with deep pockets, who clearly could have "engaged their wealth and strength" in the cause of cow protection? The cows are crowded together with insufficient grazing ground, and yet the big swamis live a life of comfort. Isn't this "neglect of cow protection"? Isn't failure to investigate and apologize for the abuses of the past "neglect of cow protection"? And yet, would Jayapataka Swami or Gopal Krsna Goswami ever say "I am uncivilized due to my neglect of cow protection"? It seems very unlikely. I know that at least Jayapataka has instigated some type of upgrade of cow conditions at Mayapur at one time in the past -- but these seemed to be stop-gap measures, aimed at placating negative public opinion. There was no fundamental reform of the situation, which would have meant only breeding cows when there is a plan to train the bull calves -- and which certainly would have meant following all ISKCON cow protection laws. But instead, we find that neither ISKCON Vrndavana nor ISKCON Mayapur can even come to the minimum cow protection standards. The fundamental reason for this is that the spiritual leaders at the very top of these programs are incapacitated by their neglect of cow protection. But instead of saying that these leaders are "uncivilized due to their neglect of cow protection" we treat them as spiritually advanced. How can that be? Instead of saying that ISKCON Vrndavana and ISKCON Mayapura are "surely doomed by Providence" due to their neglect of cow protection, as Prabhupada indicates in the quote above, we treat them like the beacon light of spiritual hope in the world. How can that be? My tendency is to become very angry at these spiritual leaders because they do not investigate past abuse of the cows in their projects; they don't apologize for past abuse of the cows; and they continue a path of neglect of cow protection by approving the continued breeding of cows even though they have no real commitment to caring for them with responsibility and compassion. But, right now, I'm putting my purely cynical tendency aside. I'm really ready to listen to you all. I'm asking all of you, my spiritual God-aunts and God-uncles and God-sisters and God-brothers: Actually is there anyway that we can consider big leaders advanced when their career are notable for their neglect of cow protection? Very sincerely, what do you all think? Are they actually qualified to be spiritual leaders? If so, how? And, is there any hope for ISKCON while it continues to be lead by powerful leaders who blatently neglect cow protection? Or, is ISKCON "surely doomed by Providence"? Again, let no one interpret this to be my endorsement of the rtviks or the Gaudiya Math, because I have thus far seen no solid example of cow protection from them either. My question is: Can someone who is strongly marked by neglect of cow protection actually be a qualified spiritual leader? your humble servant, Hare Krsna dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.