Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 Dear Members Each one of us have set our faith on different ayanamsa, and have experienced success with its application (read with dasha variations and year duration). Dasha has always been very ambigious issue for me (various dashas working; often overriding in terms of events and so on). I, at some stage, started pursuing transits (rashi chart as well D charts) as initial factor, dasha as secondary factor - and have most of the time, identified that planets in transit will always coincide (associate - conjunction, relate with natal one etc) mutually, if they have relationship in dasha (I am referring to vimshottari only) and when they associate first, very often, will be the correct begining point of that sub period. I used this for rectification of chart or adjusting of dasha (for begining period). and if such corelation exists, then only the event will materialize. List members might also have exprienced such relationship between main dasha / sub period. I rarely venture into sub sub period, as I somehow, feel much more comfortable with transit (read with on D charts as well) than dasha. regards / Prafulla Gang " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but only two to make a monkey out of man " SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 Dear Ranjan ji I agree with you that Vimshotari is not the only dasha and there are so many conditional dashas to be applied; and that is why, I often got lost in dasha based phalas. Or probably, I could not grasp the true pointers of dashas. But, I, in my astrological pursuance, deviated from dasha based phalas (probably, for my inability to dig into multi levels - without reasonable success?) and started applying transits into rashi as well D charts (with reasonable success). Unlike most astrologers, I tried to observe the dasha prevailing (only upto sub level) as corelating factor only. and most of time, upon commencement of dasha (main / sub) - planets involved, were seen corelating in transit (upon natal positioning). Somehow, I observed this corelation point, for chart recification (through dasha commencement). Irrespective of dasha system, for year duration variable, again we might end up looking at wrong / unreliable pointers. Transit (esp read with natal degrees and D charts) has been much more reliable pointer for me (with whatever ayanamsa I have settled down). Parashari talks about the use of conditional dashas. For example - if LL is in 7th or 7th lord is in lagna, then Sam Saptaka dasha to be used. I was always lost in its application. Dasha application, is one of the area, which I really need to fine tune for my jyotish pursuance. regards / Prafulla Gang " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but only two to make a monkey out of man " > > rrgb (AT) sprint (DOT) ca > Mon, 05 Jun 2006 01:44:08 -0000 > > Re: Ayanamsa issues - misc > > Prafulla, > You are wise, indeed! Given the questions that have been directed at > most birthdata, particularly those multi-posted on internet (!) by so > many, it makes sense to heed to the caution of someone who lives in > and thrives upon REALITY as you obviously do. > Your pragmatism is one of the best gifts to jyotish over the years if > I may say so! > I do have a question for you, though! If vimshottari were the only > dasha to be followed, why were the other conditional and general > dashas recommended in BPHS? > How can we be so sure that VD is the only one to follow, just because > it is so common and commonly used and recommended by those that took > up the mantle and crown after Parashara? > RR > , Prafulla Gang <jyotish> > wrote: > > > > Dear Members > > > > Each one of us have set our faith on different ayanamsa, and have > experienced success with its application (read with dasha variations > and year duration). > > > > Dasha has always been very ambigious issue for me (various dashas > working; often overriding in terms of events and so on). I, at some > stage, started pursuing transits (rashi chart as well D charts) as > initial factor, dasha as secondary factor - and have most of the > time, identified that planets in transit will always coincide > (associate - conjunction, relate with natal one etc) mutually, if > they have relationship in dasha (I am referring to vimshottari only) > and when they associate first, very often, will be the correct > begining point of that sub period. I used this for rectification of > chart or adjusting of dasha (for begining period). and if such > corelation exists, then only the event will materialize. > > > > List members might also have exprienced such relationship between > main dasha / sub period. I rarely venture into sub sub period, as I > somehow, feel much more comfortable with transit (read with on D > charts as well) than dasha. > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > > > " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, > but only two to make a monkey out of man " > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 Dear Prafulla, Actually, it is quite possible to get precise results using only transits and not using dashas at all. I always go by transits first, just like you do, and I have seen the intense effects of daily transits in horoscopes. In many cases, the dashas were not clearly tallying with the events, but transits were perfect in their explanations. Regards, Ashutosh - Prafulla Gang Monday, 05 June, 2006 07:03 Ayanamsa issues - misc Dear Members Each one of us have set our faith on different ayanamsa, and have experienced success with its application (read with dasha variations and year duration). Dasha has always been very ambigious issue for me (various dashas working; often overriding in terms of events and so on). I, at some stage, started pursuing transits (rashi chart as well D charts) as initial factor, dasha as secondary factor - and have most of the time, identified that planets in transit will always coincide (associate - conjunction, relate with natal one etc) mutually, if they have relationship in dasha (I am referring to vimshottari only) and when they associate first, very often, will be the correct begining point of that sub period. I used this for rectification of chart or adjusting of dasha (for begining period). and if such corelation exists, then only the event will materialize. List members might also have exprienced such relationship between main dasha / sub period. I rarely venture into sub sub period, as I somehow, feel much more comfortable with transit (read with on D charts as well) than dasha. regards / Prafulla Gang " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but only two to make a monkey out of man " SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 Thanks Ranjanj ji and Ashutosh ji for your encouraging note. regards / Prafulla Gang " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but only two to make a monkey out of man " > > astrologerashutosh (AT) (DOT) fr > Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:10:29 +0530 > > Re: Ayanamsa issues - misc > > Dear Prafulla, >                       Actually, it is quite possible to get precise > results using only transits and not using dashas at all. I always go by > transits first, just like you do, and I have seen the intense effects of > daily transits in horoscopes. >        In many cases, the dashas were not clearly tallying with the > events, but transits were perfect in their explanations. >        Regards, >        Ashutosh >  - >  Prafulla Gang >  >  Monday, 05 June, 2006 07:03 >  Ayanamsa issues - misc >  Dear Members >  Each one of us have set our faith on different ayanamsa, and have > experienced success with its application (read with dasha variations and > year duration). >  Dasha has always been very ambigious issue for me (various dashas > working; often overriding in terms of events and so on). I, at some > stage, started pursuing transits (rashi chart as well D charts) as > initial factor, dasha as secondary factor - and have most of the time, > identified that planets in transit will always coincide (associate - > conjunction, relate with natal one etc) mutually, if they have > relationship in dasha (I am referring to vimshottari only) and when they > associate first, very often, will be the correct begining point of that > sub period. I used this for rectification of chart or adjusting of dasha > (for begining period). and if such corelation exists, then only the event > will materialize. >  List members might also have exprienced such relationship between main > dasha / sub period. I rarely venture into sub sub period, as I somehow, > feel much more comfortable with transit (read with on D charts as well) > than dasha. >  regards / Prafulla Gang >  " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but > only two to make a monkey out of man " >  SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. >  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 Dear Mr Kumar Yes, it is a good book; but Transit by LR Chaudhry is even better compilation of transit results. regards / Prafulla Gang " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but only two to make a monkey out of man " > > gbp_kumar > Sun, 4 Jun 2006 22:52:20 -0700 (PDT) > > Re: Ayanamsa issues - misc+ TRANSITS > > Dear Asutosh, Prafull and all, >  I agree transits is one of the key elements and the birth chart is the > refernce line to work with >  and Dashas, gochara with their strenght will surely give the clue to > the event/s and their `quality' by the strength in the reference line or > birth chart >  there is a good book on transits for the benfit of readers >  PLANETS IN ORBIT (TRANSIT) by Mahendra Pratap singh >      Mr. Mahendra Pratap Singh >      52/4 Kabeer Nagar, Durga Kund >      Varanasi UP >      2210 005 >      Tel 0542-2312179 >   costs Rs. 300+ fwd charges. >  Try it and will find good effects to your interprations. > astrologerashutosh <astrologerashutosh (AT) (DOT) fr> wrote:       Dear > Prafulla, >                        Actually, it is quite possible to get precise > results using only transits and not using dashas at all. I always go by > transits first, just like you do, and I have seen the intense effects of > daily transits in horoscopes. >          In many cases, the dashas were not clearly tallying with the > events, but transits were perfect in their explanations. >          Regards, >          Ashutosh >    - >    Prafulla Gang >    >    Monday, 05 June, 2006 07:03 >    Ayanamsa issues - misc >    Dear Members >    Each one of us have set our faith on different ayanamsa, and have > experienced success with its application (read with dasha variations and > year duration). >    Dasha has always been very ambigious issue for me (various dashas > working; often overriding in terms of events and so on). I, at some > stage, started pursuing transits (rashi chart as well D charts) as > initial factor, dasha as secondary factor - and have most of the time, > identified that planets in transit will always coincide (associate - > conjunction, relate with natal one etc) mutually, if they have > relationship in dasha (I am referring to vimshottari only) and when they > associate first, very often, will be the correct begining point of that > sub period. I used this for rectification of chart or adjusting of dasha > (for begining period). and if such corelation exists, then only the > event will materialize. >    List members might also have exprienced such relationship between > main dasha / sub period. I rarely venture into sub sub period, as I > somehow, feel much more comfortable with transit (read with on D charts > as well) than dasha. >    regards / Prafulla Gang >    " It took two thousand generations to make a man from a monkey, but > only two to make a monkey out of man " >    SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. >    Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.