Guest guest Posted June 6, 2006 Report Share Posted June 6, 2006 Namaste Respected Advaitins. Gargi, the daughter of vAchaknu said, "With your permission, divine-natured brahmanas, I shall ask him 2 questions" After getting their permission, Gargi said, "yajnavalkya, what pervades above heaven, what pervades below the earth, which is heaven and earth as well as between them ? and which was, is and will be?" "By what is it pervaded ?" yajnavalkya said, "AkAsa"------------(A) 3.8.4 Gargi said,"what pervades AkAsa?" yajnavalkya said, "aksharam; neti, neti"---------(B) 3.8.8 yajnavalkya said further, "under its rule, the manifested creation is sustained" © ---- 3.8.9 In a couple of English translations of "AkAsa" of 3.8.4, it is translated as "unmanifested ether" or "unmanifested space". In the translation of "AkAsa" of 3.8.4, is "unmanifested" implied in its meaning, and translated as "unmanifested ether". In my opinion (could be wrong), yajnavalkya is quantifying the entire manifested creation in 3.8.4 and then introduces the unmanifested brahman that pervades, sustains and governs the manifested aspect (B,C). Any help to clarify the meaning of "AkAsa" is received with respect. Kind regards, Raghava Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2006 Report Share Posted June 6, 2006 Raghavarao gaaru - welcome back. Here is my understanding. AkAsha is the first of the panca bhUtas and subtlest of them all; and that is created first in the series. That which accommodates everything is AkAsha. At one stage in the evolution of science, space was considered as filled with ether. Space has to be infinite and Yajnavalkya’s answer was to the point. All manifestations are accommodated within AkAsha. Interestingly one cannot define space or AkAsha, nor can it be perceived by senses. Movement in space defines time. MadhAvas consider that space and time are recognized by Saxi. Further questioning by Gargi, Yajnavalkya says the space is pervaded by axaram - therefore axaram provides the support for space too. Mundaka explaining the material and the intelligent cause for creation are one and the same says: yathonAbhir sRijate gRihNate ca .... tathA axarAt sambhavatIha vishvam|| axaram is that which is indestructible and hence permanent, while AkASha that accommodates everything is also swallowed in the deep sleep state while axaram remains as axaram. Hari OM! Sadananda --- Raghavarao Kaluri <raghavakaluri > wrote: > Namaste Respected Advaitins. > > Gargi, the daughter of vAchaknu said, > "With your permission, divine-natured brahmanas, I > shall ask him 2 questions" > After getting their permission, Gargi said, > > "yajnavalkya, > what pervades above heaven, > what pervades below the earth, > which is heaven and earth > as well as between them ? > > and which was, is and will be?" > > "By what is it pervaded ?" > > yajnavalkya said, "AkAsa"------------(A) 3.8.4 > > Gargi said,"what pervades AkAsa?" > > yajnavalkya said, > "aksharam; neti, neti"---------(B) 3.8.8 > > yajnavalkya said further, > "under its rule, the manifested creation is sustained" > © ---- 3.8.9 > > In a couple of English translations of "AkAsa" of > 3.8.4, it is translated as "unmanifested ether" > or "unmanifested space". > > In the translation of "AkAsa" of 3.8.4, > is "unmanifested" implied in its meaning, and > translated as "unmanifested ether". > > In my opinion (could be wrong), yajnavalkya is > quantifying the entire manifested creation in 3.8.4 > and then introduces the unmanifested brahman that > pervades, sustains and governs the manifested aspect > (B,C). > > Any help to clarify the meaning of "AkAsa" is received > with respect. > > Kind regards, > Raghava > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://in.messenger. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2006 Report Share Posted June 7, 2006 Raghavendra-ji, Sadaji has already provided a wonderful explanation to your question. may i also share with you and this esteemed audience what Swami Sivananda has to say on the definition of AKASA? "The Akasa is Brahman " Akaso'rthantaratvadivyapadesat I.3.41 (104) Akasa (is Brahman) because it is declared to be something different etc., (from names and forms). Akasah: Akasa; Arthantaratvadi-vyapadesat: because it is declared to be something different; Artha: with a meaning; Antaratva: differentness. Adi: etc.; Vyapadesat: from statement on account of designation. Another expression from the Chhandogya Upanishad is now taken up for discussion. We read in Chhandogya Upanishad VIII-14-1 "That which is called Akasa is the revealer of all names and forms. That within which these names and forms are contained is Brahman, the Immortal, the Self." Here a doubt arises whether that which here is called Akasa is the Highest Brahman or the ordinary elemental ether. The Purvapakshin or the objector says that Akasa means here the elemental ether, because this is the conventional meaning of the word. To this the Siddhantin gives the following reply. Here 'Akasa' is Brahman only, because it is designated as a different thing etc. Names and forms are said to be within this Akasa, which is therefore different from these. The term Akasa signifies Brahman because it is stated to be the source of all names and forms, also because it is qualified by such epithets as 'Infinite, Immortal' 'Self'. The word Akasa, refers to Brahman because the description "beyond name and form" applies only to Brahman. " http://www.swami-krishnananda.org/bs_1/1-3-05.html here are two more quotes on Akasa from the upanishads ! He (Brahman) who, dwelling in the akasa, is distinct from akasa, whom the akasa knows not, whose body the akasa is, who rules the akasa from within, he is thy soul, the inner guide, the immortal."– Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, III. 7, 12. "It is the akasa, out of which all these creatures proceed, and into which they are again received, the akasha is older than they all, the akasa is the ultimate end."–chandogya Upanishad, I. 9, 1. Aum Shanti! Aum Shanti! Aum Shantihi! ps- there is always a metaphysical meaning to every word. Raghavendra writes : (> In my opinion (could be wrong), yajnavalkya is > quantifying the entire manifested creation in 3.8.4 > and then introduces the unmanifested brahman that > pervades, sustains and governs the manifested aspect > (B,C). > > Any help to clarify the meaning of "AkAsa" is received > with respect.) > > Kind regards, > Raghava > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.