Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Sundeep, I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha (PVR) ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com), and > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > sufficient. > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > Sanchita Karma.. > > Sundeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Narasimha, Oh please stop saying "I am just a learner ..."! You are making the rest of us neophytes and 'learners' a bit tongue-tied!! :-) Let us just accept that *all* of us here are learners, even teachers included, because can a-n-y-o-n-e who breathes and lives in mrityuloka claim to be 100% accurate? Or 95% for that matter? Even Mensa only takes the top 2 percentile in its fold! Anyway, back to the regular programming -- the term 'mahatphalam' used by Parashara for dashamamsha always made me wonder if dashamamsha chart was indeed primarily about occupation and vocation and source of daily bread alone or more related to 'significant karmic missions'. Would the varga even become *active* in all charts ... or the majority, even? Tossing a question not just at Narasimha, but others who may not be too pressed by the most abundant entity of time and may desire to contribute. I am assuming, of course, that none of the super busy 'rat-race' executive bunch is here on Jyotishgroup during astrology-time ;-) Rohiniranjan , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr wrote: > > Dear Sundeep, > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > Narasimha (PVR) > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com), and > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > > sufficient. > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > Sundeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Members: What Shri. P.V>Narasimha Rao has said is quite to the point. Dasaamsa is the chart to be studied in combination with Rasi and Shastiyaamsa for judging career aspects as this is the divisional chart for accessing profession. Regarding Sanchita / Prarabdha karma, the horoscope at birth is the indicator of the net prarabdha karma AS IT EXISTS AT BIRTH OF A NATIVE. So, reading only from natal horoscopes cannot explain certain events in current life which may have arisen from sanchita karma (the acts that a person now that may form the seed for future karma and also sometimes gives results in this life itself). Prashna chart will explain the effects of sanchita karma. In fact, Prashna Marga gives an explanation like this.....if the natal chart has more benefic influences while the Prashna chart has malefic combinations it should be understood that the prarabdha karma of the individual is good but he is suffering due to misdeeds of the current birth (sanchita). If the natal chart has malefic combinations but the prashna chart has benefic aspects, then it should be understood that the prarabdha is bad while the person's current actions have been good, and hence the sufferings are a result of prarabdha. One important thing to be understood is that prarabdha is very strong and hence evils arising out of prarabdha can be mitigated only by experiencing the results AT LEAST IN SMALL MEASURE! For instance, if you are doomed by prarabdha to lose your wife, at least long separations will have to be experienced if not actual death of wife (this sort of astrological alibis operate in the lives of persons who live spotless lives in the current birth but have accumulated some evil karma in the past lives). Whereas, results arising out of sanchita karma can be easily modified by easy remedies and change of attitudes. Whether it is Sanchita or Prarabdha karma, all these can be burnt away by absolute devotion to the Lord and Tapasya. The very act of consecrating your lives to the Divine will ensure that you are no longer bound by the bonds of karma. This is the way of Great Yogis.. ....They can willfully experience results of their karma just to obey the laws of nature and Dharma as an example to others but are not actually required to suffer like we mortals!.....Tapasya and Gnaana will destroy all sins. Ekaadasi vratam burns away all sins. Gaayathri mantra destroys all sins......Reciting Agamarshana Sooktham (trupudaadhiva munchatu.....)/Gaayathri sthothram (beginning with "Bhaktaanukampin sarvagya hrudayam paapa naasanam....) while taking bath destroys all sins.....A holy bath with absolute Faith in the Holy Ganges destroys all sins.......These are ways by which one can modify prarabdha to a great extent if not actually extinguishing it. Ultimately, the goal of human existence is to experience prarabdha and extinguish it, reduce sanchita karma so that there is no aagami karma (sanchita karma which has not given fruits in this birth will become prarabdha karma for the next birth; such karma is called aagami karma of this birth!). Thus, when there is a nil balance of all these three karmaas, a person becomes a "mukta" - a liberated one who is free from the cycle of births and deaths! May Lord Dakshinamoorthi - the Lord of Wisdom Guide us. Blessed be. Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. In vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr wrote: > > Dear Sundeep, > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > Narasimha (PVR) > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com ), and > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > > sufficient. > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > Sundeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, Pranam. Will please be kind enough to expain what you mean by Snachit, Prarabdh and Kriyaman Karma? How to see it from Kundali, Dasha/antar dasha,transit. Divisional charts. With due respect and warm regards. --- <dakshinastrologer (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: > Dear Members: > > What Shri. P.V>Narasimha Rao has said is quite to > the point. Dasaamsa > is the chart to be studied in combination with Rasi > and Shastiyaamsa > for judging career aspects as this is the divisional > chart for > accessing profession. > > Regarding Sanchita / Prarabdha karma, the horoscope > at birth is the > indicator of the net prarabdha karma AS IT EXISTS AT > BIRTH OF A > NATIVE. So, reading only from natal horoscopes > cannot explain certain > events in current life which may have arisen from > sanchita karma (the > acts that a person now that may form the seed for > future karma and > also sometimes gives results in this life itself). > Prashna chart will > explain the effects of sanchita karma. > > In fact, Prashna Marga gives an explanation like > this.....if the natal > chart has more benefic influences while the Prashna > chart has malefic > combinations it should be understood that the > prarabdha karma of the > individual is good but he is suffering due to > misdeeds of the current > birth (sanchita). If the natal chart has malefic > combinations but the > prashna chart has benefic aspects, then it should be > understood that > the prarabdha is bad while the person's current > actions have been > good, and hence the sufferings are a result of > prarabdha. One > important thing to be understood is that prarabdha > is very strong and > hence evils arising out of prarabdha can be > mitigated only by > experiencing the results AT LEAST IN SMALL MEASURE! > For instance, if > you are doomed by prarabdha to lose your wife, at > least long > separations will have to be experienced if not > actual death of wife > (this sort of astrological alibis operate in the > lives of persons who > live spotless lives in the current birth but have > accumulated some > evil karma in the past lives). Whereas, results > arising out of > sanchita karma can be easily modified by easy > remedies and change of > attitudes. > > Whether it is Sanchita or Prarabdha karma, all > these can be burnt > away by absolute devotion to the Lord and Tapasya. > The very act of > consecrating your lives to the Divine will ensure > that you are no > longer bound by the bonds of karma. This is the way > of Great Yogis.. > ...They can willfully experience results of their > karma just to obey > the laws of nature and Dharma as an example to > others but are not > actually required to suffer like we > mortals!.....Tapasya and Gnaana > will destroy all sins. Ekaadasi vratam burns away > all sins. > Gaayathri mantra destroys all sins......Reciting > Agamarshana Sooktham > (trupudaadhiva munchatu.....)/Gaayathri sthothram > (beginning with > "Bhaktaanukampin sarvagya hrudayam paapa > naasanam....) while taking > bath destroys all sins.....A holy bath with absolute > Faith in the Holy > Ganges destroys all sins.......These are ways by > which one can modify > prarabdha to a great extent if not actually > extinguishing it. > > Ultimately, the goal of human existence is to > experience prarabdha and > extinguish it, reduce sanchita karma so that there > is no aagami karma > (sanchita karma which has not given fruits in this > birth will become > prarabdha karma for the next birth; such karma is > called aagami karma > of this birth!). Thus, when there is a nil balance > of all these three > karmaas, a person becomes a "mukta" - a liberated > one who is free from > the cycle of births and deaths! > > May Lord Dakshinamoorthi - the Lord of Wisdom Guide > us. > > Blessed be. > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > In vedic astrology, "Narasimha > P.V.R. Rao" <pvr > wrote: > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just > an learner and a > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So > you will be wise > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional > charts we > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there > is actually a > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws > light on sanchita > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that > will be experienced > in future lives, if there are future lives). My > thinking is that > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw > light only on > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma > accumulated from > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced > in the current > life). > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by > combining dasamsa with > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to > use only chart and > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use > just dasamsa than > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast > rasi and > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart > such as dasamsa, fine > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, > an approximation. > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > approximation. Others may > disagree. > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > ------------------------------- > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: > http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > http://srigaruda.com > ), and > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita > karma, whereas > Rasi > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different > thread, seems to > support the > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of > life, you can > simply > > > look at that divisional. He specifically > mentioned this with the > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments > together with PVRs, > things > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it > would seem from > Visti's > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show > the Sanchita > Karma > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would > show the Prarabdha > Karma > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? > Only the > Prarabdha > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, > no? Even if you say > that > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above > which the > Prarabdha > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only > the divisional is > not > > > sufficient. > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? > Does each > divisional > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in > this context, is > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa > shows the full > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Dr. Kursija: Let us look at what Swami Sivananda says about Prarabdha and sanchita ........ "Prarabdha is that portion of the past karma which is responsible for the present body. That portion of the sanchita karma which influences human life in the present incarnation is called prarabdha. It is ripe for reaping. It cannot be avoided or changed. It is only exhausted by being experienced. You pay your past debts. prarabdha karma is that which has begun and is actually bearing fruit. It is selected out of the mass of the sanchita karma." Thus when we read a horoscope and delineate on the "expected" outcomes in the life of a person, we are in effect reading the prarabdha karma only. Sanchita is the net accumulated karma which is yet to be realized. It includes what karmic load we already have accumulated in previous lives but which we are not doomed to experience in the current birth and also the acts that we do which may constitute the seed for future births. It is only a portion of sanchita karma that converted into prarabdha karma in later births. Kriyaamaan karma is the karma resulting from our present actions which may be fruitified very fast. The dividing line between Sanchita and Kriyaamaan are very thin. Sanchita karma may impel a person to behave in certain ways to karmic imprints of previous births, leading ot new actions and new karmas that may be accumulated. Whereas kriyaamaan karma arises due the actions that a person commits out of his own free will- not under the influence of karmic influences. I will explain it with an analogy...... Suppose a person has been cursed to take birth as a "demon" for 3 lives by a saintly soul......then the actions that the person commits in those 3 births will be due to his "praarabdha".....the person will have absolutely no control over his demonaic qualities, and by laws of Nature, the violent actions that he does in those births WILL NOT constitute his future sanchita karmaas. But, if in those births he displays some act of compassion like being courteous towards devotees inspite of his aggressive tendencies, this is a "Kriyaamaan" karma where his intellect has somehow guided him to behave in a good manner contrary to his nature obtained from praarabhda. This is a good kriyaamaan karmaa which will ensure that the next birth that he takes after the 3 births as required by the curse will definitely be good. What is more, the "kriyaamaan karma" will also slightly change his environment and bring him into contact with noble thoughts, help him to hear ethical teachings that will act on his subconscious, etc..... The merits accruing out of these will get added to his sanchita karma (the karma that is not operational in the current birth fully). Out of that, a portion of the karma will be alloted as Prarabdha for the immediate birth after the series of 3 demonaic births! Thus the person may be born as a rich man, wise man, or godly man depending on the type of merit that has been accumulated ("dhaana" - honouring eligible persons with money or material comforts and "dharma" - helping the needy with material resources will help a person to take a birth in a wealthy family; teaching others, guiding the ignorant, reforming the clueless souls, etc. will help a person to take a birth in a family of wise persons in the coming births; ......meditating, chanting God's names, associating with noble souls, helping those engaged in holy acts, building temples, etc. will ensure that the person take a birth in a family that gives importance to Divine works ). There are times when "kriyaamaan karma" modifies the sanchita karma and in some cases even the praarabdha karma. Performing remedies, chanting powerful mantraas, etc. are such powerful kriyaaman karmaas. These concepts will seem to be intermingled and confusing at first... ...but when we think of it again and again and meditate their effect on our lives will be very obvious. I hope I have clarified this at least to some extent. Kindly bear with me if I have created more confusion. Blessed be. Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic astrology, "S.C. Kursija" <sckursija wrote: > > Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, > Pranam. > Will please be kind enough to expain what you mean by > Snachit, Prarabdh and Kriyaman Karma? How to see it > from Kundali, Dasha/antar dasha,transit. Divisional > charts. > With due respect and warm regards. > > --- <dakshinastrologer wrote: > > > Dear Members: > > > > What Shri. P.V>Narasimha Rao has said is quite to > > the point. Dasaamsa > > is the chart to be studied in combination with Rasi > > and Shastiyaamsa > > for judging career aspects as this is the divisional > > chart for > > accessing profession. > > > > Regarding Sanchita / Prarabdha karma, the horoscope > > at birth is the > > indicator of the net prarabdha karma AS IT EXISTS AT > > BIRTH OF A > > NATIVE. So, reading only from natal horoscopes > > cannot explain certain > > events in current life which may have arisen from > > sanchita karma (the > > acts that a person now that may form the seed for > > future karma and > > also sometimes gives results in this life itself). > > Prashna chart will > > explain the effects of sanchita karma. > > > > In fact, Prashna Marga gives an explanation like > > this.....if the natal > > chart has more benefic influences while the Prashna > > chart has malefic > > combinations it should be understood that the > > prarabdha karma of the > > individual is good but he is suffering due to > > misdeeds of the current > > birth (sanchita). If the natal chart has malefic > > combinations but the > > prashna chart has benefic aspects, then it should be > > understood that > > the prarabdha is bad while the person's current > > actions have been > > good, and hence the sufferings are a result of > > prarabdha. One > > important thing to be understood is that prarabdha > > is very strong and > > hence evils arising out of prarabdha can be > > mitigated only by > > experiencing the results AT LEAST IN SMALL MEASURE! > > For instance, if > > you are doomed by prarabdha to lose your wife, at > > least long > > separations will have to be experienced if not > > actual death of wife > > (this sort of astrological alibis operate in the > > lives of persons who > > live spotless lives in the current birth but have > > accumulated some > > evil karma in the past lives). Whereas, results > > arising out of > > sanchita karma can be easily modified by easy > > remedies and change of > > attitudes. > > > > Whether it is Sanchita or Prarabdha karma, all > > these can be burnt > > away by absolute devotion to the Lord and Tapasya. > > The very act of > > consecrating your lives to the Divine will ensure > > that you are no > > longer bound by the bonds of karma. This is the way > > of Great Yogis.. > > ...They can willfully experience results of their > > karma just to obey > > the laws of nature and Dharma as an example to > > others but are not > > actually required to suffer like we > > mortals!.....Tapasya and Gnaana > > will destroy all sins. Ekaadasi vratam burns away > > all sins. > > Gaayathri mantra destroys all sins......Reciting > > Agamarshana Sooktham > > (trupudaadhiva munchatu.....)/Gaayathri sthothram > > (beginning with > > "Bhaktaanukampin sarvagya hrudayam paapa > > naasanam....) while taking > > bath destroys all sins.....A holy bath with absolute > > Faith in the Holy > > Ganges destroys all sins.......These are ways by > > which one can modify > > prarabdha to a great extent if not actually > > extinguishing it. > > > > Ultimately, the goal of human existence is to > > experience prarabdha and > > extinguish it, reduce sanchita karma so that there > > is no aagami karma > > (sanchita karma which has not given fruits in this > > birth will become > > prarabdha karma for the next birth; such karma is > > called aagami karma > > of this birth!). Thus, when there is a nil balance > > of all these three > > karmaas, a person becomes a "mukta" - a liberated > > one who is free from > > the cycle of births and deaths! > > > > May Lord Dakshinamoorthi - the Lord of Wisdom Guide > > us. > > > > Blessed be. > > > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > In vedic astrology, "Narasimha > > P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just > > an learner and a > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So > > you will be wise > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional > > charts we > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there > > is actually a > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws > > light on sanchita > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that > > will be experienced > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My > > thinking is that > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw > > light only on > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma > > accumulated from > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced > > in the current > > life). > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by > > combining dasamsa with > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to > > use only chart and > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use > > just dasamsa than > > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast > > rasi and > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart > > such as dasamsa, fine > > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, > > an approximation. > > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > > approximation. Others may > > disagree. > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): > > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: > > http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > http://srigaruda.com > > ), and > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita > > karma, whereas > > Rasi > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different > > thread, seems to > > support the > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of > > life, you can > > simply > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically > > mentioned this with the > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments > > together with PVRs, > > things > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it > > would seem from > > Visti's > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show > > the Sanchita > > Karma > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would > > show the Prarabdha > > Karma > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? > > Only the > > Prarabdha > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, > > no? Even if you say > > that > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above > > which the > > Prarabdha > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only > > the divisional is > > not > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? > > Does each > > divisional > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in > > this context, is > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa > > shows the full > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear respected sir Dakshinamoorthi, You have beautifully explained 'karma' so that anyone could understand the differnce between various 'karmas' without much difficulty. This explains a question for which I could not find a proper answer all these years. That is, in the present day society we come across or learn about so called 'philanthropists', whose source of income is tainted with some sort of crime. Besides, such people live a very comfortable life whereas people who are really good live with lot of hardships. Can you please kindly explain this too, Sir. Terrorist leaders use pregnant mothers as suicide bombers, but the children of these leaders' enjoy luxurious lives. How can a mother carrying an unborn child murder that child intentionally? When it comes to motherhood, even animals behave more humanely. Why do these things happen sir? It is extremely sad. Blessings Renu vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer" <dakshinastrologer wrote: > > > Dear Dr. Kursija: > > Let us look at what Swami Sivananda says about Prarabdha and sanchita > ....... > "Prarabdha is that portion of the past karma which is responsible for > the present body. That portion of the sanchita karma which influences > human life in the present incarnation is called prarabdha. It is ripe > for reaping. It cannot be avoided or changed. It is only exhausted by > being experienced. You pay your past debts. prarabdha karma is that > which has begun and is actually bearing fruit. It is selected out of > the mass of the sanchita karma." > > Thus when we read a horoscope and delineate on the "expected" outcomes > in the life of a person, we are in effect reading the prarabdha karma > only. > > Sanchita is the net accumulated karma which is yet to be realized. It > includes what karmic load we already have accumulated in previous > lives but which we are not doomed to experience in the current birth > and also the acts that we do which may constitute the seed for future > births. It is only a portion of sanchita karma that converted into > prarabdha karma in later births. > > Kriyaamaan karma is the karma resulting from our present actions which > may be fruitified very fast. > > The dividing line between Sanchita and Kriyaamaan are very thin. > Sanchita karma may impel a person to behave in certain ways to karmic > imprints of previous births, leading ot new actions and new karmas > that may be accumulated. Whereas kriyaamaan karma arises due the > actions that a person commits out of his own free will- not under the > influence of karmic influences. > > I will explain it with an analogy...... > > Suppose a person has been cursed to take birth as a "demon" for 3 > lives by a saintly soul......then the actions that the person commits > in those 3 births will be due to his "praarabdha".....the person will > have absolutely no control over his demonaic qualities, and by laws of > Nature, the violent actions that he does in those births WILL NOT > constitute his future sanchita karmaas. But, if in those births he > displays some act of compassion like being courteous towards devotees > inspite of his aggressive tendencies, this is a "Kriyaamaan" karma > where his intellect has somehow guided him to behave in a good manner > contrary to his nature obtained from praarabhda. This is a good > kriyaamaan karmaa which will ensure that the next birth that he takes > after the 3 births as required by the curse will definitely be good. > What is more, the "kriyaamaan karma" will also slightly change his > environment and bring him into contact with noble thoughts, help him > to hear ethical teachings that will act on his subconscious, etc..... > The merits accruing out of these will get added to his sanchita karma > (the karma that is not operational in the current birth fully). Out > of that, a portion of the karma will be alloted as Prarabdha for the > immediate birth after the series of 3 demonaic births! Thus the > person may be born as a rich man, wise man, or godly man depending on > the type of merit that has been accumulated ("dhaana" - honouring > eligible persons with money or material comforts and "dharma" - > helping the needy with material resources will help a person to take a > birth in a wealthy family; teaching others, guiding the ignorant, > reforming the clueless souls, etc. will help a person to take a birth > in a family of wise persons in the coming births; ......meditating, > chanting God's names, associating with noble souls, helping those > engaged in holy acts, building temples, etc. will ensure that the > person take a birth in a family that gives importance to Divine works > ). > > There are times when "kriyaamaan karma" modifies the sanchita karma > and in some cases even the praarabdha karma. Performing remedies, > chanting powerful mantraas, etc. are such powerful kriyaaman karmaas. > > These concepts will seem to be intermingled and confusing at first... > ..but when we think of it again and again and meditate their effect > on our lives will be very obvious. > > I hope I have clarified this at least to some extent. Kindly bear > with me if I have created more confusion. > > Blessed be. > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > vedic astrology, "S.C. Kursija" <sckursija@> > wrote: > > > > Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, > > Pranam. > > Will please be kind enough to expain what you mean by > > Snachit, Prarabdh and Kriyaman Karma? How to see it > > from Kundali, Dasha/antar dasha,transit. Divisional > > charts. > > With due respect and warm regards. > > > > --- <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Members: > > > > > > What Shri. P.V>Narasimha Rao has said is quite to > > > the point. Dasaamsa > > > is the chart to be studied in combination with Rasi > > > and Shastiyaamsa > > > for judging career aspects as this is the divisional > > > chart for > > > accessing profession. > > > > > > Regarding Sanchita / Prarabdha karma, the horoscope > > > at birth is the > > > indicator of the net prarabdha karma AS IT EXISTS AT > > > BIRTH OF A > > > NATIVE. So, reading only from natal horoscopes > > > cannot explain certain > > > events in current life which may have arisen from > > > sanchita karma (the > > > acts that a person now that may form the seed for > > > future karma and > > > also sometimes gives results in this life itself). > > > Prashna chart will > > > explain the effects of sanchita karma. > > > > > > In fact, Prashna Marga gives an explanation like > > > this.....if the natal > > > chart has more benefic influences while the Prashna > > > chart has malefic > > > combinations it should be understood that the > > > prarabdha karma of the > > > individual is good but he is suffering due to > > > misdeeds of the current > > > birth (sanchita). If the natal chart has malefic > > > combinations but the > > > prashna chart has benefic aspects, then it should be > > > understood that > > > the prarabdha is bad while the person's current > > > actions have been > > > good, and hence the sufferings are a result of > > > prarabdha. One > > > important thing to be understood is that prarabdha > > > is very strong and > > > hence evils arising out of prarabdha can be > > > mitigated only by > > > experiencing the results AT LEAST IN SMALL MEASURE! > > > For instance, if > > > you are doomed by prarabdha to lose your wife, at > > > least long > > > separations will have to be experienced if not > > > actual death of wife > > > (this sort of astrological alibis operate in the > > > lives of persons who > > > live spotless lives in the current birth but have > > > accumulated some > > > evil karma in the past lives). Whereas, results > > > arising out of > > > sanchita karma can be easily modified by easy > > > remedies and change of > > > attitudes. > > > > > > Whether it is Sanchita or Prarabdha karma, all > > > these can be burnt > > > away by absolute devotion to the Lord and Tapasya. > > > The very act of > > > consecrating your lives to the Divine will ensure > > > that you are no > > > longer bound by the bonds of karma. This is the way > > > of Great Yogis.. > > > ...They can willfully experience results of their > > > karma just to obey > > > the laws of nature and Dharma as an example to > > > others but are not > > > actually required to suffer like we > > > mortals!.....Tapasya and Gnaana > > > will destroy all sins. Ekaadasi vratam burns away > > > all sins. > > > Gaayathri mantra destroys all sins......Reciting > > > Agamarshana Sooktham > > > (trupudaadhiva munchatu.....)/Gaayathri sthothram > > > (beginning with > > > "Bhaktaanukampin sarvagya hrudayam paapa > > > naasanam....) while taking > > > bath destroys all sins.....A holy bath with absolute > > > Faith in the Holy > > > Ganges destroys all sins.......These are ways by > > > which one can modify > > > prarabdha to a great extent if not actually > > > extinguishing it. > > > > > > Ultimately, the goal of human existence is to > > > experience prarabdha and > > > extinguish it, reduce sanchita karma so that there > > > is no aagami karma > > > (sanchita karma which has not given fruits in this > > > birth will become > > > prarabdha karma for the next birth; such karma is > > > called aagami karma > > > of this birth!). Thus, when there is a nil balance > > > of all these three > > > karmaas, a person becomes a "mukta" - a liberated > > > one who is free from > > > the cycle of births and deaths! > > > > > > May Lord Dakshinamoorthi - the Lord of Wisdom Guide > > > us. > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > In vedic astrology, "Narasimha > > > P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just > > > an learner and a > > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So > > > you will be wise > > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional > > > charts we > > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there > > > is actually a > > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws > > > light on sanchita > > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that > > > will be experienced > > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My > > > thinking is that > > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw > > > light only on > > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma > > > accumulated from > > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced > > > in the current > > > life). > > > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by > > > combining dasamsa with > > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to > > > use only chart and > > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use > > > just dasamsa than > > > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast > > > rasi and > > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart > > > such as dasamsa, fine > > > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, > > > an approximation. > > > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > > > approximation. Others may > > > disagree. > > > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): > > > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): > > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: > > > http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > ), and > > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita > > > karma, whereas > > > Rasi > > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different > > > thread, seems to > > > support the > > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of > > > life, you can > > > simply > > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically > > > mentioned this with the > > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments > > > together with PVRs, > > > things > > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it > > > would seem from > > > Visti's > > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show > > > the Sanchita > > > Karma > > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would > > > show the Prarabdha > > > Karma > > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? > > > Only the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, > > > no? Even if you say > > > that > > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above > > > which the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only > > > the divisional is > > > not > > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? > > > Does each > > > divisional > > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in > > > this context, is > > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa > > > shows the full > > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, Pranams. I enjoy reading your posts. Thanks and Regards, Harish vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer" <dakshinastrologer wrote: > > > Dear Dr. Kursija: > > Let us look at what Swami Sivananda says about Prarabdha and sanchita > ....... > "Prarabdha is that portion of the past karma which is responsible for > the present body. That portion of the sanchita karma which influences > human life in the present incarnation is called prarabdha. It is ripe > for reaping. It cannot be avoided or changed. It is only exhausted by > being experienced. You pay your past debts. prarabdha karma is that > which has begun and is actually bearing fruit. It is selected out of > the mass of the sanchita karma." > > Thus when we read a horoscope and delineate on the "expected" outcomes > in the life of a person, we are in effect reading the prarabdha karma > only. > > Sanchita is the net accumulated karma which is yet to be realized. It > includes what karmic load we already have accumulated in previous > lives but which we are not doomed to experience in the current birth > and also the acts that we do which may constitute the seed for future > births. It is only a portion of sanchita karma that converted into > prarabdha karma in later births. > > Kriyaamaan karma is the karma resulting from our present actions which > may be fruitified very fast. > > The dividing line between Sanchita and Kriyaamaan are very thin. > Sanchita karma may impel a person to behave in certain ways to karmic > imprints of previous births, leading ot new actions and new karmas > that may be accumulated. Whereas kriyaamaan karma arises due the > actions that a person commits out of his own free will- not under the > influence of karmic influences. > > I will explain it with an analogy...... > > Suppose a person has been cursed to take birth as a "demon" for 3 > lives by a saintly soul......then the actions that the person commits > in those 3 births will be due to his "praarabdha".....the person will > have absolutely no control over his demonaic qualities, and by laws of > Nature, the violent actions that he does in those births WILL NOT > constitute his future sanchita karmaas. But, if in those births he > displays some act of compassion like being courteous towards devotees > inspite of his aggressive tendencies, this is a "Kriyaamaan" karma > where his intellect has somehow guided him to behave in a good manner > contrary to his nature obtained from praarabhda. This is a good > kriyaamaan karmaa which will ensure that the next birth that he takes > after the 3 births as required by the curse will definitely be good. > What is more, the "kriyaamaan karma" will also slightly change his > environment and bring him into contact with noble thoughts, help him > to hear ethical teachings that will act on his subconscious, etc..... > The merits accruing out of these will get added to his sanchita karma > (the karma that is not operational in the current birth fully). Out > of that, a portion of the karma will be alloted as Prarabdha for the > immediate birth after the series of 3 demonaic births! Thus the > person may be born as a rich man, wise man, or godly man depending on > the type of merit that has been accumulated ("dhaana" - honouring > eligible persons with money or material comforts and "dharma" - > helping the needy with material resources will help a person to take a > birth in a wealthy family; teaching others, guiding the ignorant, > reforming the clueless souls, etc. will help a person to take a birth > in a family of wise persons in the coming births; ......meditating, > chanting God's names, associating with noble souls, helping those > engaged in holy acts, building temples, etc. will ensure that the > person take a birth in a family that gives importance to Divine works > ). > > There are times when "kriyaamaan karma" modifies the sanchita karma > and in some cases even the praarabdha karma. Performing remedies, > chanting powerful mantraas, etc. are such powerful kriyaaman karmaas. > > These concepts will seem to be intermingled and confusing at first... > ..but when we think of it again and again and meditate their effect > on our lives will be very obvious. > > I hope I have clarified this at least to some extent. Kindly bear > with me if I have created more confusion. > > Blessed be. > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > vedic astrology, "S.C. Kursija" <sckursija@> > wrote: > > > > Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, > > Pranam. > > Will please be kind enough to expain what you mean by > > Snachit, Prarabdh and Kriyaman Karma? How to see it > > from Kundali, Dasha/antar dasha,transit. Divisional > > charts. > > With due respect and warm regards. > > > > --- <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Members: > > > > > > What Shri. P.V>Narasimha Rao has said is quite to > > > the point. Dasaamsa > > > is the chart to be studied in combination with Rasi > > > and Shastiyaamsa > > > for judging career aspects as this is the divisional > > > chart for > > > accessing profession. > > > > > > Regarding Sanchita / Prarabdha karma, the horoscope > > > at birth is the > > > indicator of the net prarabdha karma AS IT EXISTS AT > > > BIRTH OF A > > > NATIVE. So, reading only from natal horoscopes > > > cannot explain certain > > > events in current life which may have arisen from > > > sanchita karma (the > > > acts that a person now that may form the seed for > > > future karma and > > > also sometimes gives results in this life itself). > > > Prashna chart will > > > explain the effects of sanchita karma. > > > > > > In fact, Prashna Marga gives an explanation like > > > this.....if the natal > > > chart has more benefic influences while the Prashna > > > chart has malefic > > > combinations it should be understood that the > > > prarabdha karma of the > > > individual is good but he is suffering due to > > > misdeeds of the current > > > birth (sanchita). If the natal chart has malefic > > > combinations but the > > > prashna chart has benefic aspects, then it should be > > > understood that > > > the prarabdha is bad while the person's current > > > actions have been > > > good, and hence the sufferings are a result of > > > prarabdha. One > > > important thing to be understood is that prarabdha > > > is very strong and > > > hence evils arising out of prarabdha can be > > > mitigated only by > > > experiencing the results AT LEAST IN SMALL MEASURE! > > > For instance, if > > > you are doomed by prarabdha to lose your wife, at > > > least long > > > separations will have to be experienced if not > > > actual death of wife > > > (this sort of astrological alibis operate in the > > > lives of persons who > > > live spotless lives in the current birth but have > > > accumulated some > > > evil karma in the past lives). Whereas, results > > > arising out of > > > sanchita karma can be easily modified by easy > > > remedies and change of > > > attitudes. > > > > > > Whether it is Sanchita or Prarabdha karma, all > > > these can be burnt > > > away by absolute devotion to the Lord and Tapasya. > > > The very act of > > > consecrating your lives to the Divine will ensure > > > that you are no > > > longer bound by the bonds of karma. This is the way > > > of Great Yogis.. > > > ...They can willfully experience results of their > > > karma just to obey > > > the laws of nature and Dharma as an example to > > > others but are not > > > actually required to suffer like we > > > mortals!.....Tapasya and Gnaana > > > will destroy all sins. Ekaadasi vratam burns away > > > all sins. > > > Gaayathri mantra destroys all sins......Reciting > > > Agamarshana Sooktham > > > (trupudaadhiva munchatu.....)/Gaayathri sthothram > > > (beginning with > > > "Bhaktaanukampin sarvagya hrudayam paapa > > > naasanam....) while taking > > > bath destroys all sins.....A holy bath with absolute > > > Faith in the Holy > > > Ganges destroys all sins.......These are ways by > > > which one can modify > > > prarabdha to a great extent if not actually > > > extinguishing it. > > > > > > Ultimately, the goal of human existence is to > > > experience prarabdha and > > > extinguish it, reduce sanchita karma so that there > > > is no aagami karma > > > (sanchita karma which has not given fruits in this > > > birth will become > > > prarabdha karma for the next birth; such karma is > > > called aagami karma > > > of this birth!). Thus, when there is a nil balance > > > of all these three > > > karmaas, a person becomes a "mukta" - a liberated > > > one who is free from > > > the cycle of births and deaths! > > > > > > May Lord Dakshinamoorthi - the Lord of Wisdom Guide > > > us. > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > In vedic astrology, "Narasimha > > > P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just > > > an learner and a > > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So > > > you will be wise > > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional > > > charts we > > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there > > > is actually a > > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws > > > light on sanchita > > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that > > > will be experienced > > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My > > > thinking is that > > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw > > > light only on > > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma > > > accumulated from > > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced > > > in the current > > > life). > > > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by > > > combining dasamsa with > > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to > > > use only chart and > > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use > > > just dasamsa than > > > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast > > > rasi and > > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart > > > such as dasamsa, fine > > > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, > > > an approximation. > > > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > > > approximation. Others may > > > disagree. > > > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): > > > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): > > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: > > > http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > ), and > > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita > > > karma, whereas > > > Rasi > > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different > > > thread, seems to > > > support the > > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of > > > life, you can > > > simply > > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically > > > mentioned this with the > > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments > > > together with PVRs, > > > things > > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it > > > would seem from > > > Visti's > > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show > > > the Sanchita > > > Karma > > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would > > > show the Prarabdha > > > Karma > > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? > > > Only the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, > > > no? Even if you say > > > that > > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above > > > which the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only > > > the divisional is > > > not > > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? > > > Does each > > > divisional > > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in > > > this context, is > > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa > > > shows the full > > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, Pranams. I enjoy reading your posts. Thanks and Regards, Harish vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer" <dakshinastrologer wrote: > > > Dear Dr. Kursija: > > Let us look at what Swami Sivananda says about Prarabdha and sanchita > ....... > "Prarabdha is that portion of the past karma which is responsible for > the present body. That portion of the sanchita karma which influences > human life in the present incarnation is called prarabdha. It is ripe > for reaping. It cannot be avoided or changed. It is only exhausted by > being experienced. You pay your past debts. prarabdha karma is that > which has begun and is actually bearing fruit. It is selected out of > the mass of the sanchita karma." > > Thus when we read a horoscope and delineate on the "expected" outcomes > in the life of a person, we are in effect reading the prarabdha karma > only. > > Sanchita is the net accumulated karma which is yet to be realized. It > includes what karmic load we already have accumulated in previous > lives but which we are not doomed to experience in the current birth > and also the acts that we do which may constitute the seed for future > births. It is only a portion of sanchita karma that converted into > prarabdha karma in later births. > > Kriyaamaan karma is the karma resulting from our present actions which > may be fruitified very fast. > > The dividing line between Sanchita and Kriyaamaan are very thin. > Sanchita karma may impel a person to behave in certain ways to karmic > imprints of previous births, leading ot new actions and new karmas > that may be accumulated. Whereas kriyaamaan karma arises due the > actions that a person commits out of his own free will- not under the > influence of karmic influences. > > I will explain it with an analogy...... > > Suppose a person has been cursed to take birth as a "demon" for 3 > lives by a saintly soul......then the actions that the person commits > in those 3 births will be due to his "praarabdha".....the person will > have absolutely no control over his demonaic qualities, and by laws of > Nature, the violent actions that he does in those births WILL NOT > constitute his future sanchita karmaas. But, if in those births he > displays some act of compassion like being courteous towards devotees > inspite of his aggressive tendencies, this is a "Kriyaamaan" karma > where his intellect has somehow guided him to behave in a good manner > contrary to his nature obtained from praarabhda. This is a good > kriyaamaan karmaa which will ensure that the next birth that he takes > after the 3 births as required by the curse will definitely be good. > What is more, the "kriyaamaan karma" will also slightly change his > environment and bring him into contact with noble thoughts, help him > to hear ethical teachings that will act on his subconscious, etc..... > The merits accruing out of these will get added to his sanchita karma > (the karma that is not operational in the current birth fully). Out > of that, a portion of the karma will be alloted as Prarabdha for the > immediate birth after the series of 3 demonaic births! Thus the > person may be born as a rich man, wise man, or godly man depending on > the type of merit that has been accumulated ("dhaana" - honouring > eligible persons with money or material comforts and "dharma" - > helping the needy with material resources will help a person to take a > birth in a wealthy family; teaching others, guiding the ignorant, > reforming the clueless souls, etc. will help a person to take a birth > in a family of wise persons in the coming births; ......meditating, > chanting God's names, associating with noble souls, helping those > engaged in holy acts, building temples, etc. will ensure that the > person take a birth in a family that gives importance to Divine works > ). > > There are times when "kriyaamaan karma" modifies the sanchita karma > and in some cases even the praarabdha karma. Performing remedies, > chanting powerful mantraas, etc. are such powerful kriyaaman karmaas. > > These concepts will seem to be intermingled and confusing at first... > ..but when we think of it again and again and meditate their effect > on our lives will be very obvious. > > I hope I have clarified this at least to some extent. Kindly bear > with me if I have created more confusion. > > Blessed be. > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > vedic astrology, "S.C. Kursija" <sckursija@> > wrote: > > > > Respected Pt.Dakshnamoorty ji, > > Pranam. > > Will please be kind enough to expain what you mean by > > Snachit, Prarabdh and Kriyaman Karma? How to see it > > from Kundali, Dasha/antar dasha,transit. Divisional > > charts. > > With due respect and warm regards. > > > > --- <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Members: > > > > > > What Shri. P.V>Narasimha Rao has said is quite to > > > the point. Dasaamsa > > > is the chart to be studied in combination with Rasi > > > and Shastiyaamsa > > > for judging career aspects as this is the divisional > > > chart for > > > accessing profession. > > > > > > Regarding Sanchita / Prarabdha karma, the horoscope > > > at birth is the > > > indicator of the net prarabdha karma AS IT EXISTS AT > > > BIRTH OF A > > > NATIVE. So, reading only from natal horoscopes > > > cannot explain certain > > > events in current life which may have arisen from > > > sanchita karma (the > > > acts that a person now that may form the seed for > > > future karma and > > > also sometimes gives results in this life itself). > > > Prashna chart will > > > explain the effects of sanchita karma. > > > > > > In fact, Prashna Marga gives an explanation like > > > this.....if the natal > > > chart has more benefic influences while the Prashna > > > chart has malefic > > > combinations it should be understood that the > > > prarabdha karma of the > > > individual is good but he is suffering due to > > > misdeeds of the current > > > birth (sanchita). If the natal chart has malefic > > > combinations but the > > > prashna chart has benefic aspects, then it should be > > > understood that > > > the prarabdha is bad while the person's current > > > actions have been > > > good, and hence the sufferings are a result of > > > prarabdha. One > > > important thing to be understood is that prarabdha > > > is very strong and > > > hence evils arising out of prarabdha can be > > > mitigated only by > > > experiencing the results AT LEAST IN SMALL MEASURE! > > > For instance, if > > > you are doomed by prarabdha to lose your wife, at > > > least long > > > separations will have to be experienced if not > > > actual death of wife > > > (this sort of astrological alibis operate in the > > > lives of persons who > > > live spotless lives in the current birth but have > > > accumulated some > > > evil karma in the past lives). Whereas, results > > > arising out of > > > sanchita karma can be easily modified by easy > > > remedies and change of > > > attitudes. > > > > > > Whether it is Sanchita or Prarabdha karma, all > > > these can be burnt > > > away by absolute devotion to the Lord and Tapasya. > > > The very act of > > > consecrating your lives to the Divine will ensure > > > that you are no > > > longer bound by the bonds of karma. This is the way > > > of Great Yogis.. > > > ...They can willfully experience results of their > > > karma just to obey > > > the laws of nature and Dharma as an example to > > > others but are not > > > actually required to suffer like we > > > mortals!.....Tapasya and Gnaana > > > will destroy all sins. Ekaadasi vratam burns away > > > all sins. > > > Gaayathri mantra destroys all sins......Reciting > > > Agamarshana Sooktham > > > (trupudaadhiva munchatu.....)/Gaayathri sthothram > > > (beginning with > > > "Bhaktaanukampin sarvagya hrudayam paapa > > > naasanam....) while taking > > > bath destroys all sins.....A holy bath with absolute > > > Faith in the Holy > > > Ganges destroys all sins.......These are ways by > > > which one can modify > > > prarabdha to a great extent if not actually > > > extinguishing it. > > > > > > Ultimately, the goal of human existence is to > > > experience prarabdha and > > > extinguish it, reduce sanchita karma so that there > > > is no aagami karma > > > (sanchita karma which has not given fruits in this > > > birth will become > > > prarabdha karma for the next birth; such karma is > > > called aagami karma > > > of this birth!). Thus, when there is a nil balance > > > of all these three > > > karmaas, a person becomes a "mukta" - a liberated > > > one who is free from > > > the cycle of births and deaths! > > > > > > May Lord Dakshinamoorthi - the Lord of Wisdom Guide > > > us. > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > In vedic astrology, "Narasimha > > > P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just > > > an learner and a > > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So > > > you will be wise > > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional > > > charts we > > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there > > > is actually a > > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws > > > light on sanchita > > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that > > > will be experienced > > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My > > > thinking is that > > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw > > > light only on > > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma > > > accumulated from > > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced > > > in the current > > > life). > > > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by > > > combining dasamsa with > > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to > > > use only chart and > > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use > > > just dasamsa than > > > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast > > > rasi and > > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart > > > such as dasamsa, fine > > > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, > > > an approximation. > > > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > > > approximation. Others may > > > disagree. > > > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): > > > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): > > > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: > > > http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > ), and > > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita > > > karma, whereas > > > Rasi > > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different > > > thread, seems to > > > support the > > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of > > > life, you can > > > simply > > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically > > > mentioned this with the > > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments > > > together with PVRs, > > > things > > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it > > > would seem from > > > Visti's > > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show > > > the Sanchita > > > Karma > > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would > > > show the Prarabdha > > > Karma > > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? > > > Only the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, > > > no? Even if you say > > > that > > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above > > > which the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only > > > the divisional is > > > not > > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? > > > Does each > > > divisional > > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in > > > this context, is > > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa > > > shows the full > > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Respected members I feel Narasimha ji is right in considering multiple amshas.He has mentioned combinations of Rashi,dashamsha and shashtyamsha.But i feel navamsha too should be considered. Classical texts do speak about the navamsha lord of 10th lord for deciding profession.Only difference in opinion i have is considering amshas as charts- as it is against the advise of sages and aganist the fundamental principles. One point to note is while considering amshas,Kshethra usage as compared to Rashi will avoid many confusions.Though Kshethra and Rashi are synonymns,they have a different meaning,while thinking of amshas. Monday always convey the same meaning - but Monday in january and Monday in February,do not represent the same date or for that matter Monday in the first week of a month and monday falling in other weeks. Thus sages have defined 12 bhavas,using the basic bulding block called Rashi.The same Rashis have diffrent classes known as Vargas and a planet or lagna can relate to different Rashis,from its single position in a Rashi.Each sambandha is for a purpose.For example its dashamsha samandha is for Mahatphalam. Thanks Pradeep vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr wrote: > > Dear Sundeep, > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > Narasimha (PVR) > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com), and > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > > sufficient. > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > Sundeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Rohini, If I may add my two bits worth of input. "Mahat" means abundant, considerable, important distinguished by, a great personality, greatness, power, sacred knowledge and even buddhi (intelligence) depending on context used. As the 10th bhava is also called Kirti sthana it might be in order to look at the 10th house significance from the Dashamsha on that account. At the same time if we look at the results given in the first few shlokas of Karmabhavaphalaadhya (chapter on results of the 10th bhava) of BPHS, relating it to religious or sacred work done by the jataka can not be ruled out. As a matter of fact many of the shlokas talk about the tendency of the jataka and his doing or not doing his duties and one shloka talks about the Jataka being learned on account of certain position of Jupiter and Moon. So basing the choice of one's profession on merely the 10th house may not be tenable. I personally prefer to look at influences on 9th, 10th and the 11th bhava before coming to any conclusion about a jataka's career. Of course that is my personal opinion and others more learned than me might hold a different view on the subject. Chandrashekhar. Rohini (Crystal Pages) wrote: > > Narasimha, > > Oh please stop saying "I am just a learner ..."! You are making the > rest of us neophytes and 'learners' a bit tongue-tied!! :-) > > Let us just accept that *all* of us here are learners, even teachers > included, because can a-n-y-o-n-e who breathes and lives in > mrityuloka claim to be 100% accurate? Or 95% for that matter? Even > Mensa only takes the top 2 percentile in its fold! > > Anyway, back to the regular programming -- the term 'mahatphalam' > used by Parashara for dashamamsha always made me wonder if > dashamamsha chart was indeed primarily about occupation and vocation > and source of daily bread alone or more related to 'significant > karmic missions'. Would the varga even become *active* in all > charts ... or the majority, even? > > Tossing a question not just at Narasimha, but others who may not be > too pressed by the most abundant entity of time and may desire to > contribute. I am assuming, of course, that none of the super > busy 'rat-race' executive bunch is here on Jyotishgroup during > astrology-time ;-) > > Rohiniranjan > > > <%40>, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr > wrote: > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced > in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current > life). > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa > than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, > fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an > approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > approximation. Others may disagree. > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > Narasimha (PVR) > > ------------------------- > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > <http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > <http://www.VedicAstrologer.org> > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > <http://www.SriJagannath.org> > > ------------------------- > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>), and > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas > Rasi > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to > support the > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can > simply > > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, > things > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from > Visti's > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita > Karma > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha > Karma > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the > Prarabdha > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say > that > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the > Prarabdha > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is > not > > > sufficient. > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each > divisional > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Respected members I feel Narasimha ji is right in considering multiple amshas.He has mentioned combinations of Rashi,dashamsha and shashtyamsha.But i feel navamsha too should be considered. Classical texts do speak about the navamsha lord of 10th lord for deciding profession.Only difference in opinion i have is considering amshas as charts- as it is against the advise of sages and against fundamental principles. One point to note is while considering amshas,Kshethra usage as compared to Rashi will avoid many confusions.Though Kshethra and Rashi are synonymns,they have a different meaning,while thinking of amshas. Monday always convey the same meaning - but Monday in january and Monday in February,do not represent the same date or for that matter Monday in the first week of a month and monday falling in other weeks. Thus sages have defined 12 bhavas,using the basic bulding block called Rashi.The same Rashis have diffrent classes known as Vargas and a planet or lagna can relate to different Rashis,from its single position in a Rashi.Each sambandha is for a purpose.For example its dashamsha samandha is for Mahatphalam. Thanks Pradeep , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr wrote: > > Dear Sundeep, > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > Narasimha (PVR) > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com), and > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > > sufficient. > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > Sundeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Respected members I feel Narasimha ji is right in considering multiple amshas.He has mentioned combinations of Rashi,dashamsha and shashtyamsha.But i feel navamsha too should be considered. Classical texts do speak about the navamsha lord of 10th lord for deciding profession.Only difference in opinion i have is considering amshas as charts- as it is against the advise of sages and against fundamental principles. One point to note is while considering amshas,Kshethra usage as compared to Rashi will avoid many confusions.Though Kshethra and Rashi are synonymns,they have a different meaning,while thinking of amshas. Monday always convey the same meaning - but Monday in january and Monday in February,do not represent the same date or for that matter Monday in the first week of a month and monday falling in other weeks. Thus sages have defined 12 bhavas,using the basic bulding block called Rashi.The same Rashis have diffrent classes known as Vargas and a planet or lagna can relate to different Rashis,from its single position in a Rashi.Each sambandha is for a purpose.For example its dashamsha samandha is for Mahatphalam. Thanks Pradeep , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr wrote: > > Dear Sundeep, > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > Narasimha (PVR) > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com), and > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > > sufficient. > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > Sundeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Namaste, IMHO, Rasi chart indicates Sanchita Karma, if the Lagna and 5th houses are flawless & indicate that there is no "future life" after death.Where there are flaw in the Lagna and 5th house; Rasi in relation with Amsa show Prarabdha Karma. shashtyamsa show the qualities inherited by Naisargika karakas . "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: Dear Sundeep, I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise to take my words with a pinch of salt. My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may disagree. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha (PVR) ------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------- > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at http://srigaruda.com), and > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to support the > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha Karma > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say that > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > sufficient. > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > Sanchita Karma.. > > Sundeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Dear Chandrashekhar, Thanks for your email. I just happened to note that in your preferred set (houses) you did not include houses that indicate education (other than advanced education from 9th but so few get that advanced training, overall). If you get a free moment and feel like responding, please do. RR , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > Dear Rohini, > > If I may add my two bits worth of input. "Mahat" means abundant, > considerable, important distinguished by, a great personality, > greatness, power, sacred knowledge and even buddhi (intelligence) > depending on context used. As the 10th bhava is also called Kirti sthana > it might be in order to look at the 10th house significance from the > Dashamsha on that account. > > At the same time if we look at the results given in the first few > shlokas of Karmabhavaphalaadhya (chapter on results of the 10th bhava) > of BPHS, relating it to religious or sacred work done by the jataka can > not be ruled out. As a matter of fact many of the shlokas talk about the > tendency of the jataka and his doing or not doing his duties and one > shloka talks about the Jataka being learned on account of certain > position of Jupiter and Moon. So basing the choice of one's profession > on merely the 10th house may not be tenable. > > I personally prefer to look at influences on 9th, 10th and the 11th > bhava before coming to any conclusion about a jataka's career. Of course > that is my personal opinion and others more learned than me might hold a > different view on the subject. > Chandrashekhar. > > Rohini (Crystal Pages) wrote: > > > > Narasimha, > > > > Oh please stop saying "I am just a learner ..."! You are making the > > rest of us neophytes and 'learners' a bit tongue-tied!! :-) > > > > Let us just accept that *all* of us here are learners, even teachers > > included, because can a-n-y-o-n-e who breathes and lives in > > mrityuloka claim to be 100% accurate? Or 95% for that matter? Even > > Mensa only takes the top 2 percentile in its fold! > > > > Anyway, back to the regular programming -- the term 'mahatphalam' > > used by Parashara for dashamamsha always made me wonder if > > dashamamsha chart was indeed primarily about occupation and vocation > > and source of daily bread alone or more related to 'significant > > karmic missions'. Would the varga even become *active* in all > > charts ... or the majority, even? > > > > Tossing a question not just at Narasimha, but others who may not be > > too pressed by the most abundant entity of time and may desire to > > contribute. I am assuming, of course, that none of the super > > busy 'rat-race' executive bunch is here on Jyotishgroup during > > astrology-time ;-) > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > <%40>, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current > > life). > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa > > than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, > > fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an > > approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > > approximation. Others may disagree. > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > ------------------------- > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > <http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > <http://www.VedicAstrologer.org> > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > <http://www.SriJagannath.org> > > > ------------------------- > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>), and > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas > > Rasi > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to > > support the > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can > > simply > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, > > things > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from > > Visti's > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita > > Karma > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha > > Karma > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the > > Prarabdha > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say > > that > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the > > Prarabdha > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is > > not > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each > > divisional > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Hmm... each floor has 12 rooms with the same flat-number, but a different meal is being cooked on the 16 different floors! , "vijayadas_pradeep" <vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Respected members > > I feel Narasimha ji is right in considering multiple amshas.He has > mentioned combinations of Rashi,dashamsha and shashtyamsha.But i feel > navamsha too should be considered. > Classical texts do speak about the navamsha lord of 10th lord for > deciding profession.Only difference in opinion i have is considering > amshas as charts- as it is against the advise of sages and against > fundamental principles. > One point to note is while considering amshas,Kshethra usage as > compared to Rashi will avoid many confusions.Though Kshethra and Rashi > are synonymns,they have a different meaning,while thinking of amshas. > Monday always convey the same meaning - but Monday in january and > Monday in February,do not represent the same date or for that matter > Monday in the first week of a month and monday falling in other weeks. > Thus sages have defined 12 bhavas,using the basic bulding block called > Rashi.The same Rashis have diffrent classes known as Vargas and a > planet or lagna can relate to different Rashis,from its single > position in a Rashi.Each sambandha is for a purpose.For example its > dashamsha samandha is for Mahatphalam. > > Thanks > Pradeep > > , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and a > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be wise > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be experienced > in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current life). > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart and > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa than > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, fine > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may > disagree. > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > Narasimha (PVR) > > ------------------------------- > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > ------------------------------- > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > http://srigaruda.com), and > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas Rasi > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to > support the > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can simply > > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with the > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, things > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from Visti's > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita Karma > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha > Karma > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the Prarabdha > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you say > that > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the Prarabdha > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional is not > > > sufficient. > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each divisional > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Namaste Rohini ji The problem is a single person has to live in sixteen different floors at the same point in time:). Is this possible.If not then then the analogy has to be reworked. In jyotishastra at a single point in time a single planet from a single position can have numerous vargas.For this we have to imagine w.r to the anatomy of SPACE vis-a-vis time. Thanks Pradeep , "Rohini (Crystal Pages)" <rrgb wrote: > > Hmm... each floor has 12 rooms with the same flat-number, but a > different meal is being cooked on the 16 different floors! > > > > , "vijayadas_pradeep" > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > Dear Respected members > > > > I feel Narasimha ji is right in considering multiple amshas.He has > > mentioned combinations of Rashi,dashamsha and shashtyamsha.But i > feel > > navamsha too should be considered. > > Classical texts do speak about the navamsha lord of 10th lord for > > deciding profession.Only difference in opinion i have is considering > > amshas as charts- as it is against the advise of sages and against > > fundamental principles. > > One point to note is while considering amshas,Kshethra usage as > > compared to Rashi will avoid many confusions.Though Kshethra and > Rashi > > are synonymns,they have a different meaning,while thinking of > amshas. > > Monday always convey the same meaning - but Monday in january and > > Monday in February,do not represent the same date or for that matter > > Monday in the first week of a month and monday falling in other > weeks. > > Thus sages have defined 12 bhavas,using the basic bulding block > called > > Rashi.The same Rashis have diffrent classes known as Vargas and a > > planet or lagna can relate to different Rashis,from its single > > position in a Rashi.Each sambandha is for a purpose.For example its > > dashamsha samandha is for Mahatphalam. > > > > Thanks > > Pradeep > > > > , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner and > a > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be > wise > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be > experienced > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current > life). > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa with > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart > and > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa > than > > just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, > fine > > judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an approximation. > > Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best approximation. Others may > > disagree. > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > ------------------------------- > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > http://srigaruda.com), and > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas > Rasi > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to > > support the > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can > simply > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with > the > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, > things > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from > Visti's > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita > Karma > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the Prarabdha > > Karma > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the > Prarabdha > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you > say > > that > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the > Prarabdha > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional > is not > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each > divisional > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the full > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Dear Rohini, There are two reasons for that. One is that "Mahat" related to education points to sacred knowledge and so 9th would be indicated. Other reason is that when we consider profession it is not necessary that one's chosen profession will be in the same line as one's education. An example would be Dr. Shriram Laagu who while by education being a physician chose acting as his career. I trust this explains why I have these preferences for trying to divine profession/career/service. Chandrashekhar. Rohini (Crystal Pages) wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar, > > Thanks for your email. I just happened to note that in your preferred > set (houses) you did not include houses that indicate education > (other than advanced education from 9th but so few get that advanced > training, overall). If you get a free moment and feel like > responding, please do. > > RR > > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > > > Dear Rohini, > > > > If I may add my two bits worth of input. "Mahat" means abundant, > > considerable, important distinguished by, a great personality, > > greatness, power, sacred knowledge and even buddhi (intelligence) > > depending on context used. As the 10th bhava is also called Kirti > sthana > > it might be in order to look at the 10th house significance from > the > > Dashamsha on that account. > > > > At the same time if we look at the results given in the first few > > shlokas of Karmabhavaphalaadhya (chapter on results of the 10th > bhava) > > of BPHS, relating it to religious or sacred work done by the jataka > can > > not be ruled out. As a matter of fact many of the shlokas talk > about the > > tendency of the jataka and his doing or not doing his duties and > one > > shloka talks about the Jataka being learned on account of certain > > position of Jupiter and Moon. So basing the choice of one's > profession > > on merely the 10th house may not be tenable. > > > > I personally prefer to look at influences on 9th, 10th and the 11th > > bhava before coming to any conclusion about a jataka's career. Of > course > > that is my personal opinion and others more learned than me might > hold a > > different view on the subject. > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > Rohini (Crystal Pages) wrote: > > > > > > Narasimha, > > > > > > Oh please stop saying "I am just a learner ..."! You are making > the > > > rest of us neophytes and 'learners' a bit tongue-tied!! :-) > > > > > > Let us just accept that *all* of us here are learners, even > teachers > > > included, because can a-n-y-o-n-e who breathes and lives in > > > mrityuloka claim to be 100% accurate? Or 95% for that matter? Even > > > Mensa only takes the top 2 percentile in its fold! > > > > > > Anyway, back to the regular programming -- the term 'mahatphalam' > > > used by Parashara for dashamamsha always made me wonder if > > > dashamamsha chart was indeed primarily about occupation and > vocation > > > and source of daily bread alone or more related to 'significant > > > karmic missions'. Would the varga even become *active* in all > > > charts ... or the majority, even? > > > > > > Tossing a question not just at Narasimha, but others who may not > be > > > too pressed by the most abundant entity of time and may desire to > > > contribute. I am assuming, of course, that none of the super > > > busy 'rat-race' executive bunch is here on Jyotishgroup during > > > astrology-time ;-) > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > <%40> > > > <%40>, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" > <pvr@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > > > > > I am not very learned in this matter and I am just an learner > and a > > > seeker of truth who is yet to be fully satisfied. So you will be > wise > > > to take my words with a pinch of salt. > > > > > > > > My thinking is that none of the sixteen divisional charts we > > > normally use shows sanchita karma. I wonder if there is actually a > > > higher astrological chart/parameter that throws light on sanchita > > > karma (karma accumulated from previous lives that will be > experienced > > > in future lives, if there are future lives). My thinking is that > > > shashtyamsa, rasi and allied divisional charts throw light only on > > > various aspects of praarbdha karma (part of karma accumulated from > > > previous lives that is earmarked to be experienced in the current > > > life). > > > > > > > > BTW, I think that career should be seen by combining dasamsa > with > > > rasi and shashtyamsa atleast. But, if one wants to use only chart > and > > > not go into combining several charts, I'd rather use just dasamsa > > > than just rasi. But, my position is that unless atleast rasi and > > > shashtyamsa are combined with a divisional chart such as dasamsa, > > > fine judgments cannot be made. Anything else is, to me, an > > > approximation. Judging dasamsa alone, to me, is the best > > > approximation. Others may disagree. > > > > > > > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > > > > Narasimha (PVR) > > > > ------------------------- > > > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > <http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> > > > <http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > <http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net>> > > > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > <http://www.VedicAstrologer.org> > > > <http://www.VedicAstrologer.org <http://www.VedicAstrologer.org>> > > > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > <http://www.SriJagannath.org> > > > <http://www.SriJagannath.org <http://www.SriJagannath.org>> > > > > ------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti/PVR/Other Gurus, > > > > > > > > > > I was reading Visti's article on Navamsa (at > > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com> <http://srigaruda.com > <http://srigaruda.com>>), and > > > > > Visti says that divisional charts show Sanchita karma, whereas > > > Rasi > > > > > shows Prarabdha karma. PVR, in a different thread, seems to > > > support the > > > > > notion that in order to see a specific aspect of life, you can > > > simply > > > > > look at that divisional. He specifically mentioned this with > the > > > > > Dasamsa. But when I put Visti's comments together with PVRs, > > > things > > > > > dont seem to be consistent. Because then it would seem from > > > Visti's > > > > > statements that Dasamsa (for example) would show the Sanchita > > > Karma > > > > > of "career", whereas 10th house of Rasi would show the > Prarabdha > > > Karma > > > > > of "career". So, why look at the Dasamsa at all? Only the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > Karma is going to play out in this life time, no? Even if you > say > > > that > > > > > Sanchita Karma sets the baseline over and above which the > > > Prarabdha > > > > > plays out, it still means that looking at only the divisional > is > > > not > > > > > sufficient. > > > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify what exactly is the truth? Does each > > > divisional > > > > > show some aspect of Sanchita Karma? What, in this context, is > > > > > Shastyamsa then? I used to think that Shastyamsa shows the > full > > > > > Sanchita Karma.. > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.