Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on Jun 15, 2006:

 

Dear Ramakanata Prabhu,

PAMHO, AGTSP,

You ask:

 

> So please explain why the statement

>

> "In 1968 Srila Prabhupada did not want to be the sole diksa guru for

> ISKCON for its whole duration"

>

> or the statement

>

> "In 1968 Srila Prabhupada wanted that at some point in time during the

> whole existence of ISKCON one or more of his disciples accepts his own

> disciples within ISKCON"

>

> contradicts the statement

>

> "It is not the etiquette that a disciples initiates his own disciples

> while his guru is still present".

 

Because, for the THIRD time, the evidence you used to prove:

 

"In 1968 Srila Prabhupada did not want to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON

for its whole duration"

 

....states that this ‘allowance’ may be granted by 1975, not merely at some

point in ‘ISKCON’s whole duration’. As we all know Srila Prabhupada was

still present in 1975! You are now desperately trying to distance yourself

from the VERY SAME evidence you used to establish your position. Is that a

sign of intelligence?

 

Thus you remain defeated.

 

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu