Guest guest Posted June 25, 2006 Report Share Posted June 25, 2006 > You've maintained that I've been offensive to Mahatma, but have so far > failed to indicate where. You can "hold" whatever you like, but your > statements should be based on fact. I saw an attack on Mahatma rather than his arguments in the words: > I'm surprised to hear it coming from you. and > I can't believe I have to say this to someone of your long standing in these paragraphs: > Which is the same as saying it's more potent than chanting Hare Krishna, > which is a load of old socks. I've about had enough of hearing that line, > prabhu. I'm surprised to hear it coming from you. > > Psychology doesn't help "deep emotional issues." The only thing that can > help anyone in Kali yuga is chanting Hare Krishna. harer nama harer nama > harer nama eva kevalam...etc. I can't believe I have to say this to > someone of your long standing, prabhu.... Imagine these paragraphs without the last sentence in each of them. Maybe I was wrong. If I read too much into it, as can happen with e-mail, then I humbly, with straw in my mouth, request you to please forgive me. --ys, td Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.