Guest guest Posted June 25, 2006 Report Share Posted June 25, 2006 > > You've maintained that I've been offensive to Mahatma, but have so far > > failed to indicate where. You can "hold" whatever you like, but your > > statements should be based on fact. > > I saw an attack on Mahatma rather than his arguments in the words: > > > I'm surprised to hear it coming from you. > and > > I can't believe I have to say this to someone of your long standing That's hardly what I'd call an "attack." > > in these paragraphs: > > > Which is the same as saying it's more potent than chanting Hare Krishna, > > which is a load of old socks. I've about had enough of hearing that > > line, prabhu. I'm surprised to hear it coming from you. > > > > Psychology doesn't help "deep emotional issues." The only thing that can > > help anyone in Kali yuga is chanting Hare Krishna. harer nama harer nama > > harer nama eva kevalam...etc. I can't believe I have to say this to > > someone of your long standing, prabhu.... > > Imagine these paragraphs without the last sentence in each of them. Why? > > Maybe I was wrong. If I read too much into it, as can happen with e-mail, > then I humbly, with straw in my mouth, request you to please forgive me. There's nothing to "forgive" -- you haven't offended me. You decided I'd offended Mahatama and so you pounced. I'm over it ys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.