Guest guest Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 CC Adi 4.51.purp. The transcendental mellow relished by the gopis in Vraja is superexcellently featured in Srimati Radharani. Mature assimilation of the transcendental humor of conjugal love is represented by Srimati Radharani, whose feelings are incomprehensible even to the Lord Himself. The intensity of Her loving service is the highest form of ecstasy. No one can surpass Srimati Radharani in relishing the qualities of the Lord through this supreme transcendental mellow. Therefore the Lord Himself agreed to assume the position of Radharani in the form of Lord Sri Gauranga. He then relished the highest position of parakiya-rasa, as exhibited in the transcendental abode of Vraja. See also other quotes to compliment below. > Srila Prabhupada gives credit to "enjoying the same facility or the same > amount of pleasure as the Supreme" and "the enjoyment can be equally > participated". > > So far couldn't find about "enjoying more than the Lord". > > ************************************************************************** > ** > > We are not enjoyer; we are enjoyed. So we must know our constitutional > position, that we are not enjoyer; we are enjoyed. As soon as we are > convinced to this particular... > Now, enjoyer and enjoyed, both of them have got consciousness. Just > like the husband and the wife. The husband is the enjoyer, the wife is the > enjoyed, but both of them are conscious. But the consciousness of the > enjoyed is the subordinate to the consciousness of the enjoyer. So > although the supreme consciousness is the supreme enjoyer, and we are > enjoyed, but the enjoyment can be equally participated when there is > actual enjoyment. So our enjoyment can be perfect, our enjoyment can be > perfected when we participate the enjoyment of God. > > Bhagavad-gita Lecture Excerpts: 2.44-45, 2.58, New York, March 25, 1966 > > ************************************************************************** > ** > > "..The Supreme Personality of Godhead and the living entity are > qualitatively one; both are defined as purusa. The quality of purusa > exists both in the Supreme Godhead and in the living entity. Purusa means > "enjoyer," and the spirit of enjoyment is present both in the living > entity and in the Supreme Lord. The difference is that the quantity of > enjoyment is not equal. The living entity cannot experience the same > quantity of enjoyment as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. An analogy > may be made with a rich man and a poor man: the propensity for enjoyment > is present in both, but the poor man cannot enjoy in the same quantity as > the rich man. When the poor man dovetails his desires with those of the > rich man, however, and when there is cooperation between the poor man and > the rich man, or between the big and the small man, then the enjoyment is > shared equally. That is like bhakti-yoga. purusah purusam vrajet: when the > living entity enters into the kingdom of God and cooperates with the > Supreme Lord by giving Him enjoyment, he enjoys the same facility or the > same amount of pleasure as the Supreme Personality of Godhead." > > SB 3.29.25 ppt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.