Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 >It is *not* clear in this series of verses that it was "our" Brahma that >desired sex from his daughter. And it was just a thought, not an act. There >is no indicator of her age. > >It is clear that it was very wrong and that he left is body as a result. >Brahma is a post. However, since Lord Brahmaji is the first living entity in the universe at any given kalpa, there is just no way he can get anybody but his own offspring for a wife if he decides to have one. I guess this fact alone vindicates the otherwise incestuous situation somewhat. Your servant, Madana-mohana das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.