Yogakarka becoming Badhkesh (Technical - viewpoints)

[Guest guest]

Prafullaji,

 

adding to your post...i also seen sukra delivering quite exceptionally

well for kumbha lagna...the mahadasha and antars are always quite good

so far...abt his bhadaka aspect..i had not seen much...

but one basic question for my understanding.? is it not we are mixing

two different theories..? i have seen some threads on this same topic

in vedic astrology as well as jyotish vidya groups...can you more

light on this please?

 

sriganeshh

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla,

 

I have not seen any conclusion on the threads..

but on jyotish vidya forum, the moderator is very clear that these

two are different ways..like yogakaraka is parashara and bhadakesh

by jaimini...and one should take it accordingly in chart reading...

may be if we read kumbha lagna native charts applying parashara and

jaimini principles separately, we may come across something..

 

regards

sriganeshh

 

 

, Prafulla Gang <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Srihaneshh ji

>

> Many thanks for sharing your experience.

>

> No, I am not mixing it. While looking at a role of a planet, we

often get to see many roles (e.g. yoga karaka, badhakesh etc). I am

just seeking fellow members' experience. Even I think the same that

yogakaraka will prevail.

>

> Yes, there has been threads on this on vedic-astroogy group and

many of the thread, I have been participant too. Could you see any

consensus on the thread?

>

> regards / Prafulla Gang

>

> We all have our time machines. Some take us back, They're called

memories. Some take us forward, they're called dreams.

>

>

> >

> > sriganeshh

> > Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:22:36 -0000

> >

> > Re: Yogakarka becoming Badhkesh (Technical -

viewpoints)

> >

> > Prafullaji,

> >

> > adding to your post...i also seen sukra delivering quite

exceptionally

> > well for kumbha lagna...the mahadasha and antars are always

quite good

> > so far...abt his bhadaka aspect..i had not seen much...

> > but one basic question for my understanding.? is it not we are

mixing

> > two different theories..? i have seen some threads on this same

topic

> > in vedic astrology as well as jyotish vidya groups...can you more

> > light on this please?

> >

> > sriganeshh

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sriganesha ji,

 

Badhak sthan is mentioned in Parashari (BPHS). If there is doubt, I

can look for and give the specific sloka. If others have it ready at

hand, please share.

 

In fact by that token most of jaimini fundamentals are given in BPHS

so this classification of Parashari vs Jaimini is artificial.

 

RR

 

, "sriganeshh"

<sriganeshh wrote:

>

> Dear Prafulla,

>

> I have not seen any conclusion on the threads..

> but on jyotish vidya forum, the moderator is very clear that these

> two are different ways..like yogakaraka is parashara and bhadakesh

> by jaimini...and one should take it accordingly in chart reading...

> may be if we read kumbha lagna native charts applying parashara and

> jaimini principles separately, we may come across something..

>

> regards

> sriganeshh

>

>

> , Prafulla Gang <jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Srihaneshh ji

> >

> > Many thanks for sharing your experience.

> >

> > No, I am not mixing it. While looking at a role of a planet, we

> often get to see many roles (e.g. yoga karaka, badhakesh etc). I am

> just seeking fellow members' experience. Even I think the same that

> yogakaraka will prevail.

> >

> > Yes, there has been threads on this on vedic-astroogy group and

> many of the thread, I have been participant too. Could you see any

> consensus on the thread?

> >

> > regards / Prafulla Gang

> >

> > We all have our time machines. Some take us back, They're called

> memories. Some take us forward, they're called dreams.

> >

> >

> > >

> > > sriganeshh@

> > > Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:22:36 -0000

> > >

> > > Re: Yogakarka becoming Badhkesh (Technical -

> viewpoints)

> > >

> > > Prafullaji,

> > >

> > > adding to your post...i also seen sukra delivering quite

> exceptionally

> > > well for kumbha lagna...the mahadasha and antars are always

> quite good

> > > so far...abt his bhadaka aspect..i had not seen much...

> > > but one basic question for my understanding.? is it not we are

> mixing

> > > two different theories..? i have seen some threads on this same

> topic

> > > in vedic astrology as well as jyotish vidya groups...can you

more

> > > light on this please?

> > >

> > > sriganeshh

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sriganeshji,

 

Some, most. all of us grew in a home that was our childhood!

We had parents, we had a father!

When we think of childhood -- is it our father we think about or

childhood?

 

Answers will vary!

 

You are still talking about the lord connected with the kshetra!

 

Maybe we should really focus on that!

 

While dad (ruler) never goes away, would you not say that the bhava

or sthana last longer than the RULER?

 

, "sriganeshh"

<sriganeshh wrote:

>

> Dear RRji,

>

> I have seen this...but i am not sure how badhaksthan / its lord

will

> behave when he happens to be yogakaraka...? i have seen only

> yogakaraka results..so far but i am a learner and long way to go...

>

> regards

> sriganeshh

>

>

> , "crystal pages"

> <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sriganesha ji,

> >

> > Badhak sthan is mentioned in Parashari (BPHS). If there is doubt,

> I

> > can look for and give the specific sloka. If others have it ready

> at

> > hand, please share.

> >

> > In fact by that token most of jaimini fundamentals are given in

> BPHS

> > so this classification of Parashari vs Jaimini is artificial.

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , "sriganeshh"

> > <sriganeshh@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Prafulla,

> > >

> > > I have not seen any conclusion on the threads..

> > > but on jyotish vidya forum, the moderator is very clear that

> these

> > > two are different ways..like yogakaraka is parashara and

> bhadakesh

> > > by jaimini...and one should take it accordingly in chart

> reading...

> > > may be if we read kumbha lagna native charts applying parashara

> and

> > > jaimini principles separately, we may come across something..

> > >

> > > regards

> > > sriganeshh

> > >

> > >

> > > , Prafulla Gang

> <jyotish@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Srihaneshh ji

> > > >

> > > > Many thanks for sharing your experience.

> > > >

> > > > No, I am not mixing it. While looking at a role of a planet,

> we

> > > often get to see many roles (e.g. yoga karaka, badhakesh etc).

I

> am

> > > just seeking fellow members' experience. Even I think the same

> that

> > > yogakaraka will prevail.

> > > >

> > > > Yes, there has been threads on this on vedic-astroogy group

> and

> > > many of the thread, I have been participant too. Could you see

> any

> > > consensus on the thread?

> > > >

> > > > regards / Prafulla Gang

> > > >

> > > > We all have our time machines. Some take us back, They're

> called

> > > memories. Some take us forward, they're called dreams.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > sriganeshh@

> > > > > Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:22:36 -0000

> > > > >

> > > > > Re: Yogakarka becoming Badhkesh (Technical -

> > > viewpoints)

> > > > >

> > > > > Prafullaji,

> > > > >

> > > > > adding to your post...i also seen sukra delivering quite

> > > exceptionally

> > > > > well for kumbha lagna...the mahadasha and antars are always

> > > quite good

> > > > > so far...abt his bhadaka aspect..i had not seen much...

> > > > > but one basic question for my understanding.? is it not we

> are

> > > mixing

> > > > > two different theories..? i have seen some threads on this

> same

> > > topic

> > > > > in vedic astrology as well as jyotish vidya groups...can

you

> > more

> > > > > light on this please?

> > > > >

> > > > > sriganeshh

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

RRji,

 

i do agree with you....but still somehow my inner self is searching

for something in this concept. may be time for me to re-learn.

 

Let me first focus on this concepts framework before rewriting on

this thread....thanks for your inputs.

 

regards

sriganeshh

 

, "crystal pages"

<jyotish_vani wrote:

>

> Sriganeshji,

>

> Some, most. all of us grew in a home that was our childhood!

> We had parents, we had a father!

> When we think of childhood -- is it our father we think about or

> childhood?

>

> Answers will vary!

>

> You are still talking about the lord connected with the kshetra!

>

> Maybe we should really focus on that!

>

> While dad (ruler) never goes away, would you not say that the

bhava

> or sthana last longer than the RULER?

>

> , "sriganeshh"

> <sriganeshh@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear RRji,

> >

> > I have seen this...but i am not sure how badhaksthan / its lord

> will

> > behave when he happens to be yogakaraka...? i have seen only

> > yogakaraka results..so far but i am a learner and long way to

go...

> >

> > regards

> > sriganeshh

> >

> >

> > , "crystal pages"

> > <jyotish_vani@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Sriganesha ji,

> > >

> > > Badhak sthan is mentioned in Parashari (BPHS). If there is

doubt,

> > I

> > > can look for and give the specific sloka. If others have it

ready

> > at

> > > hand, please share.

> > >

> > > In fact by that token most of jaimini fundamentals are given

in

> > BPHS

> > > so this classification of Parashari vs Jaimini is artificial.

> > >

> > > RR

> > >

> > > , "sriganeshh"

> > > <sriganeshh@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prafulla,

> > > >

> > > > I have not seen any conclusion on the threads..

> > > > but on jyotish vidya forum, the moderator is very clear that

> > these

> > > > two are different ways..like yogakaraka is parashara and

> > bhadakesh

> > > > by jaimini...and one should take it accordingly in chart

> > reading...

> > > > may be if we read kumbha lagna native charts applying

parashara

> > and

> > > > jaimini principles separately, we may come across something..

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > sriganeshh

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , Prafulla Gang

> > <jyotish@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Srihaneshh ji

> > > > >

> > > > > Many thanks for sharing your experience.

> > > > >

> > > > > No, I am not mixing it. While looking at a role of a

planet,

> > we

> > > > often get to see many roles (e.g. yoga karaka, badhakesh

etc).

> I

> > am

> > > > just seeking fellow members' experience. Even I think the

same

> > that

> > > > yogakaraka will prevail.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes, there has been threads on this on vedic-astroogy

group

> > and

> > > > many of the thread, I have been participant too. Could you

see

> > any

> > > > consensus on the thread?

> > > > >

> > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang

> > > > >

> > > > > We all have our time machines. Some take us back, They're

> > called

> > > > memories. Some take us forward, they're called dreams.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sriganeshh@

> > > > > > Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:22:36 -0000

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Re: Yogakarka becoming Badhkesh

(Technical -

> > > > viewpoints)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Prafullaji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > adding to your post...i also seen sukra delivering quite

> > > > exceptionally

> > > > > > well for kumbha lagna...the mahadasha and antars are

always

> > > > quite good

> > > > > > so far...abt his bhadaka aspect..i had not seen much...

> > > > > > but one basic question for my understanding.? is it not

we

> > are

> > > > mixing

> > > > > > two different theories..? i have seen some threads on

this

> > same

> > > > topic

> > > > > > in vedic astrology as well as jyotish vidya groups...can

> you

> > > more

> > > > > > light on this please?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sriganeshh

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>