Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 In Your Portal, Shri Prafullji, I beg You and expect You to please mantain ethical moral norms of judgement, instead of showing any favouritism. For ex. I was asked to apolozise, (no harm for a daughter in law apolozising to her mother in law ,forget who was to blame ), which I did. But none of the elite group of You 3-4 memebrs had the courage to say this to the other gentleman who used these words. When You call a person cross breed of stray dogs it means that his mother and father are first not human beings but dogs, and next have gone hither and thither and mated out of legal wedlock to create the person who is being called cross breed. Appeasing is okay to a certain extent for what gains (I do not know ?), but not treating the new weak member as absolute punching bag, for no harm done on his part.? , is it good ? Yet I have had the decency to apologise. Was not the provocation on both sides ? Then it should be quits.Person using slanderous language should apologise or person at the receiving end ? What strange logic, It goes over the head. But like You said sometimes words are harsher than the intentions, this maturity was there in me thats why for no fault of mines I did the apolozising part. Dont people discuss heatedly ? Whats wrong in it ? This is done by both sides. But if I abuse somone with bad words then Will You ask the person whom I abused, to aplogise by saying that You have provocated ? This is sheer nonsense . If I abuse someone then its me to apologize sir and not he. I have not complained to the moderator to take action again Kumarji and ban him. I am not so small minded. But I did send a mail long back asking the moderator--copying and pasting the same for all to read-to send a circular to all members- ".......................but just a circular -probably if You think right that all members should refrain from personal attacks, sarcasm, and dirty language addressed to any one personal. " Does this mean complaining ? I have never asked the moderator to even reprimand Prashantji. Also I am not the prime ministerof India that he will listen to me. Again the moderator is not born yesterday and small baby that he will base his action on just one complaint. He is also smart and he has shown his unbiased judgement by not favouriting any old member, without mincing words, calling spade as spade, then taking action and again mercifully, with Kingly qualities removing the ban again. That I would call justice. Now maybe some people are little harsh in judgement, instead of editing posts or issuing warnings he must have in a fit of rage banned the gentlemen . But also at times harsh judgement is required (In Arabic countries why are there so less rapes or robberries ?) I would not think much of this as long as the human qualities of kindness have also been shown by removing the ban. A single letter of complaint cannot trigger the ban, only a series of continous mails by aggrieved people must have caused this. You should also note that the Moderator coming with his post that the ban has been received was preceded by my post to requesting him for calling off the ban. Then why not a word of thanks now if I can also say that my mail has done the work. Sir not one person, not one mail can trigger of bans on a person on a public Forum if the moderator is good, and unbiased. Question of apolozising again as You suggested- When I have not induced the ban ,neither right hand man of moderator to convince him to do so , neither sent him any mail suggesting him to take action on the gentleman banned, then what is the justification for me to apolozise ? (Prafullji I am not saying this to You now) I request all the members not connected with this issue now not to put any further inputs in this issue and create trouble to aggrived parties, for their enjoyment. Shri Prafullji You will also notice that I have apolozised to both Ranjanji and also Arjunji, Arjunji has gracefully reciprocated back by mantaining communication in form of replies to posts, which shows his magnanmious nature .Actually he induced me to this Forum by proper nurturing with his classic collector mail. Also note all of You that now nothing remains between me and The banned gentlemen ie. Shri Prashantji, I have also send a loving post for him to read MISSING YOU which echoes my feelings towards Him. I do not wish anyone now put ghee in fire and change those feelings . Also Shri Prafullji, I hope I have cleared myself and will not fall in Your eyes and esteem. You have been a loving friend. Bhaskar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Dear Bhaskar ji Little busy day for me. Can you share your contact nos with me (private mail), and suggest me convenient time for me to call you. regards / Prafulla Gang "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." > > bhaskar_jyotish (AT) (DOT) co.in > Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:15:39 -0000 > > PRAFULLJI LETS CLOSE THIS ISSUE > > In Your Portal, Shri Prafullji, I beg You and expect You to please > mantain ethical moral norms of judgement, > instead of showing any favouritism. > For ex. I was asked to apolozise, (no harm for a daughter in law > apolozising to her mother in law ,forget > who was to blame ), which I did. But none of the elite group of You > 3-4 memebrs had the courage to say this to the other gentleman who > used these words. When You call a person cross breed > of stray dogs it means that his mother and father are first not human > beings but dogs, and next have gone hither and thither and mated out > of legal wedlock to create the person who is being called cross breed. > Appeasing is okay to a certain extent for what gains (I do not > know ?), but not treating the new weak member as absolute punching > bag, for no harm done on his part.? , is it good ? > Yet I have had the decency to apologise. Was not the provocation on > both sides ? Then it > should be quits.Person using slanderous language should apologise or > person at the receiving > end ? What strange logic, It goes over the head. > But like You said sometimes words are harsher than the intentions, > this maturity was there in me > thats why for no fault of mines I did the apolozising part. Dont > people discuss heatedly ? Whats > wrong in it ? This is done by both sides. But if I abuse somone with > bad words then Will You ask the person whom I abused, to aplogise by > saying that You have provocated ? This is sheer nonsense . If I > abuse someone then its me to apologize sir and not he. > > I have not complained to the moderator to take action again Kumarji > and ban him. I am not so small minded. But I did send a mail long > back asking the moderator--copying and pasting the same for all to > read-to > send a circular to all members- > ".......................but just a circular -probably > if You think right that all members should refrain from personal > attacks, sarcasm, and dirty > language addressed to any one personal. " > > Does this mean complaining ? I have never asked the moderator to even > reprimand Prashantji. > Also I am not the prime ministerof India that he will listen to me. > Again the moderator is not born yesterday > and small baby that he will base his action on just one complaint. He > is also smart and he has shown his > unbiased judgement by not favouriting any old member, without mincing > words, calling spade as spade, > then taking action and again mercifully, with Kingly qualities > removing the ban again. That I would > call justice. Now maybe some people are little harsh in judgement, > instead of editing posts or issuing warnings he must have in a fit of > rage banned the gentlemen . But also at times harsh judgement is > required > (In Arabic countries why are there so less rapes or robberries ?) I > would not think much of this as long as the human qualities of > kindness have also been shown by removing the ban. A single letter of > complaint cannot trigger the ban, only a series of continous mails by > aggrieved people must have caused this. > You should also note that the Moderator coming with his post that the > ban has been received was preceded by my post to requesting him for > calling off the ban. Then why not a word of thanks now if I can also > say that my mail has done the work. Sir not one person, not one mail > can trigger of bans on a person on a public Forum if the moderator is > good, and unbiased. > > Question of apolozising again as You suggested- When I have not > induced the ban ,neither right hand man > of moderator to convince him to do so , neither sent him any mail > suggesting him to take action on the gentleman banned, then what is > the justification for me to apolozise ? > > (Prafullji I am not saying this to You now) I request all the members > not connected with this issue now not to put any further inputs in > this issue and create trouble to aggrived parties, for their > enjoyment. > > Shri Prafullji You will also notice that I have apolozised to both > Ranjanji and also Arjunji, Arjunji has gracefully reciprocated back > by mantaining communication in form of replies to posts, which shows > his magnanmious nature .Actually he induced me to this Forum by > proper nurturing with his classic collector mail. > > Also note all of You that now nothing remains between me and The > banned gentlemen ie. Shri Prashantji, I have also send a loving post > for him to read MISSING YOU which echoes my feelings towards Him. I do > not wish anyone now put ghee in fire and change those feelings . Also > Shri Prafullji, I hope I have cleared myself and will not fall in > Your eyes and esteem. You have been a loving friend. > > Bhaskar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Dear all, This matter has been completely closed now.We are all looking forward to homecoming of Shri Prashantji. Bhaskar. , Prafulla Gang <jyotish wrote: > > Dear Bhaskar ji > > Little busy day for me. Can you share your contact nos with me (private mail), and suggest me convenient time for me to call you. > > regards / Prafulla Gang > > "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." > > > > > > bhaskar_jyotish > > Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:15:39 -0000 > > > > PRAFULLJI LETS CLOSE THIS ISSUE > > > > In Your Portal, Shri Prafullji, I beg You and expect You to please > > mantain ethical moral norms of judgement, > > instead of showing any favouritism. > > For ex. I was asked to apolozise, (no harm for a daughter in law > > apolozising to her mother in law ,forget > > who was to blame ), which I did. But none of the elite group of You > > 3-4 memebrs had the courage to say this to the other gentleman who > > used these words. When You call a person cross breed > > of stray dogs it means that his mother and father are first not human > > beings but dogs, and next have gone hither and thither and mated out > > of legal wedlock to create the person who is being called cross breed. > > Appeasing is okay to a certain extent for what gains (I do not > > know ?), but not treating the new weak member as absolute punching > > bag, for no harm done on his part.? , is it good ? > > Yet I have had the decency to apologise. Was not the provocation on > > both sides ? Then it > > should be quits.Person using slanderous language should apologise or > > person at the receiving > > end ? What strange logic, It goes over the head. > > But like You said sometimes words are harsher than the intentions, > > this maturity was there in me > > thats why for no fault of mines I did the apolozising part. Dont > > people discuss heatedly ? Whats > > wrong in it ? This is done by both sides. But if I abuse somone with > > bad words then Will You ask the person whom I abused, to aplogise by > > saying that You have provocated ? This is sheer nonsense . If I > > abuse someone then its me to apologize sir and not he. > > > > I have not complained to the moderator to take action again Kumarji > > and ban him. I am not so small minded. But I did send a mail long > > back asking the moderator--copying and pasting the same for all to > > read-to > > send a circular to all members- > > ".......................but just a circular -probably > > if You think right that all members should refrain from personal > > attacks, sarcasm, and dirty > > language addressed to any one personal. " > > > > Does this mean complaining ? I have never asked the moderator to even > > reprimand Prashantji. > > Also I am not the prime ministerof India that he will listen to me. > > Again the moderator is not born yesterday > > and small baby that he will base his action on just one complaint. He > > is also smart and he has shown his > > unbiased judgement by not favouriting any old member, without mincing > > words, calling spade as spade, > > then taking action and again mercifully, with Kingly qualities > > removing the ban again. That I would > > call justice. Now maybe some people are little harsh in judgement, > > instead of editing posts or issuing warnings he must have in a fit of > > rage banned the gentlemen . But also at times harsh judgement is > > required > > (In Arabic countries why are there so less rapes or robberries ?) I > > would not think much of this as long as the human qualities of > > kindness have also been shown by removing the ban. A single letter of > > complaint cannot trigger the ban, only a series of continous mails by > > aggrieved people must have caused this. > > You should also note that the Moderator coming with his post that the > > ban has been received was preceded by my post to requesting him for > > calling off the ban. Then why not a word of thanks now if I can also > > say that my mail has done the work. Sir not one person, not one mail > > can trigger of bans on a person on a public Forum if the moderator is > > good, and unbiased. > > > > Question of apolozising again as You suggested- When I have not > > induced the ban ,neither right hand man > > of moderator to convince him to do so , neither sent him any mail > > suggesting him to take action on the gentleman banned, then what is > > the justification for me to apolozise ? > > > > (Prafullji I am not saying this to You now) I request all the members > > not connected with this issue now not to put any further inputs in > > this issue and create trouble to aggrived parties, for their > > enjoyment. > > > > Shri Prafullji You will also notice that I have apolozised to both > > Ranjanji and also Arjunji, Arjunji has gracefully reciprocated back > > by mantaining communication in form of replies to posts, which shows > > his magnanmious nature .Actually he induced me to this Forum by > > proper nurturing with his classic collector mail. > > > > Also note all of You that now nothing remains between me and The > > banned gentlemen ie. Shri Prashantji, I have also send a loving post > > for him to read MISSING YOU which echoes my feelings towards Him. I do > > not wish anyone now put ghee in fire and change those feelings . Also > > Shri Prafullji, I hope I have cleared myself and will not fall in > > Your eyes and esteem. You have been a loving friend. > > > > Bhaskar. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.