Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Ghataka

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

 

Dear V_Kumar,

 

Namaskar. In our parampara (Sri

Jagannath), we are always told to see the Ghataka dosha and advice

accordingly in matters of relationship. Ghataka is a serious dosha and

shows basic differences in compatibility. In popular culture, people are

happily getting ashtakuta and mangalik matches done and approving

relationships automatically. Very often marriage problems shows tithi

ghataka but that is after marriage and children has already become

reality. Yes, it is advised not to pursue such relationships. Lets not

talk about weightage because we know harmonious relationship will not

happen in the first place.

 

In those cases where marriage has already taken place between two

individuals, and ghataka problems have arisen, the advise is Mangal

Shaanti (Mangal is karaka of ghata). But this is not remedy and it is

just hoped to make things better. Incompatibility remains, because it is

the core nature of the individuals.

 

I didn't understand your query about 'Dveja' star. Please provide the

birth details of the two natives in question.

 

Best wishes,

 

Sourav

 

=================================================================

 

 

, "v_kumar" <v_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear Sourabh,

>

> I hope you had gone through Ghataka Chakra article by Sanjay Rath.

>

> I asked a doubt on this forum quite a few days back (around 6th

July)about the utiltiy of coloumn 3A (additional tithis) indicated in

table-1 of the article and my douby about Dveja star (not able to make

out which star does it mean). Please clarify.

>

> The Ghataka seems to be an alarming dosha and raises some serious

flaws in relationship issues. If that is so, should this dosha be taken

into consideration in matching of charts for marriage and give a final

verdict through it ? It may happen, that the charts are well matched

kutawise but may have tithi or day ghatak, should it be rejected ?

>

> Please indicate, if the Ghataka may really cause topsy turvy in a

relationship and the weightage assigned to it ?

>

> Can you please tell me, which classic has the reference of Ghataka for

relationships etc.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Vijay Kumar

>

>

>

> New Message Search

> Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the

improved message search.

>

>

>

> Share feedback on the new changes to Groups

>

> Recent Activity

> a.. 17New Members

> b.. 1New Links

> Visit Your Group .

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

 

Dear V_Kumar,

 

Namaskar. Comments below.

 

Best wishes,

 

Sourav

 

==============================================================

, "v_kumar" <v_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear Sorav,

>

> Thanks for your response. It is well understood.

>

> 01.

> My next doubt is regarding Dveja star. To explain where does my doubt

lies, the table-1 of the Ghatak chakra article is being reproduced

below.

 

..

 

..

 

..

 

 

> Here, you may notice that in column 5 under Nakshatra, Dveja is

written against Sagittarius Rasi. My doubt is "Which is this nakshatra ?

"

 

[sourav]: In my opinion, Ashwini is referred by the word Dvijaa. The

reason I think is because Ashwini nakshatra is ruled by the two Ashwini

Kumar brothers and hence indicated two. We need to verify this from

Visti-ji.

 

 

>

> 02.

> Next doubt is about the column 3A. Column 3 talks about a tithi group

(Nanda, Bhadra...) and 3A lists some special tithis. I have not

understood the application of the tithis listed under column 3A.

 

[sourav]: I am not prepared to understand this. I am thinking of the

table itself and not how to use it.

 

 

>

> 03.

> Should the panchanga elements be seen for the Ghataka dosha or even

arudha or planets in those positions be also involved ?

 

[sourav]: Panchanga elements are elements of time. Are you talking of

tattva ?

 

 

> For example, in Capricorn rasi native, if the partner does not have

any ghataka dosha but partner's arudha falls in Leo, whether that would

mean any thing significantly ?

 

[sourav]: The table talks about Lagna and not AL.

 

 

> Also, if some planets are placed in Leo, whether those dasha/antara of

partners would be difficult for the native etc.

>

 

[sourav]: The article is based on Sanjay-ji's research. I am not willing

to make comments without research.

 

 

> Finally, should I understand that ghataka dosha, apart from

matrimonial relationship, may be applied anywhere between 2 people

working or living together, even with the self and children or between

the self and business partners etc ?

 

[sourav]: Each person is born at a moment which has a particular

panchanga and indicates a quality of time. The person is the time itself

! Because Time and the persona are born out of the pancha tattvas. If

this time-quality is incompatible with another time-quality then

conflict occurs. I think there are examples of sambandhas outside

marriage given in that article. Gataka principles are two be checked

whenever two different people or entities are converging.

 

 

>

> Thanks,

>

> Vijay Kumar

>

> -

> Sourav

>

> Friday, July 28, 2006 12:36 PM

> [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Ghataka

>

>

>

> || Hare Rama Krishna ||

>

> Dear V_Kumar,

>

> Namaskar. In our parampara (Sri Jagannath), we are always told to see

the Ghataka dosha and advice accordingly in matters of relationship.

Ghataka is a serious dosha and shows basic differences in compatibility.

In popular culture, people are happily getting ashtakuta and mangalik

matches done and approving relationships automatically. Very often

marriage problems shows tithi ghataka but that is after marriage and

children has already become reality. Yes, it is advised not to pursue

such relationships. Lets not talk about weightage because we know

harmonious relationship will not happen in the first place.

>

> In those cases where marriage has already taken place between two

individuals, and ghataka problems have arisen, the advise is Mangal

Shaanti (Mangal is karaka of ghata). But this is not remedy and it is

just hoped to make things better. Incompatibility remains, because it is

the core nature of the individuals.

>

> I didn't understand your query about 'Dveja' star. Please provide the

birth details of the two natives in question.

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Sourav

>

> =================================================================

>

>

> , "v_kumar" v_kumar@ wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sourabh,

> >

> > I hope you had gone through Ghataka Chakra article by Sanjay Rath.

> >

> > I asked a doubt on this forum quite a few days back (around 6th

July)about the utiltiy of coloumn 3A (additional tithis) indicated in

table-1 of the article and my douby about Dveja star (not able to make

out which star does it mean). Please clarify.

> >

> > The Ghataka seems to be an alarming dosha and raises some serious

flaws in relationship issues. If that is so, should this dosha be taken

into consideration in matching of charts for marriage and give a final

verdict through it ? It may happen, that the charts are well matched

kutawise but may have tithi or day ghatak, should it be rejected ?

> >

> > Please indicate, if the Ghataka may really cause topsy turvy in a

relationship and the weightage assigned to it ?

> >

> > Can yo u please tell me, which classic has the reference of Ghataka

for relationships etc.

> >

> > Thanks,

> >

> > Vijay Kumar

> >

> >

> >

> > New Message Search

> > Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the

improved message search.

> >

> >

> >

> > Share feedback on the new changes to Groups

> >

> > Recent Activity

> > a.. 17New Members

> > b.. 1New Links

> > Visit Your Group .

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...