Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Dear Pandit Arjunji, Pranam. You have kindly suggested to me for my own well being, to have a positive bias in my writings and postings. I have just given a post to a gentleman (Of course nothing personal) about HIS misgivings on Kala sarpa Dosha, Now I ask You. 1) When I feel certain posts by any member does not go in line with ethical nroms of astrology, or 2) Suppose I have better explanation to give to native to satisfy him,when I feel that the reply should have been more satisying to him, then, 1) Would You want me to speak up,having strong convictions, for the betterment of astrolgy and its believers. or 2) remain mute spectator to what is going on, which may not be proper ? I also know when I will do the former I will be creating oppositions all the way,I dont mind that if the cause is good. Sir please give your kind advise. I promise I will listen whatever You say. Yours affectionately. Bhaskar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 dear bhaskarji you must respond to any mail to whom you feel like responding. however, please follow these which i preach and practice: 1. express ONLY what you feel. 2. do not criticise others views. 3. you are entitled to express your views just as others express their views. 4. if you find a particular post of others objectionable like the one where the astrolgoer mentioned a particular yoga meant only for quacks. if i am in your shoes and i want to express my objection to his posting, i will never criticise him but ask him like this: dear sir, you have mentioned that ksy is meant only quacks based on your research and understanding. there are some old temples which are jyotirlingas like nashik and kalahasti and many other temples where this pooja has been in practice for centuries. at least i am aware that in kalahasti they charge only rs.250 as of now (much less earlier) for this pooja and give the prasadam to the native. they are all noble priests not doing any business. do you think they are also quacks who are doing this holy pious poojas in the name of ksy. you will find rotten apples in all kinds of professions, but to say that all remedies for this yoga are for quacks is not supported by facts. an athiest may say that god does not exist and hence all temples, mosques, churches and planet worships are all menat only for quacks. unfortunatley facts do not support these theories and WORSHIP IS A BELIEF OF A PERSON AND THE CONSTITUTION HAS GIVEN FREEDOM OF PRACTICE OF ANY RELIGION WHICH MEANS ANY DIETY OR ANY WORSHIP. SO KINDLY DESIST IN CRITICISING OTHERS FOR DOING SOMETHING WHICH YOU DONT BELIEVE. if you write such a positve language, the person who wrote such strong comments will not use further bad language. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun , "bhaskar_jyotish" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear Pandit Arjunji, > Pranam. > > You have kindly suggested to me for my own well being, to > have a positive bias in my writings and postings. > I have just given a post to a gentleman (Of course nothing personal) > about HIS misgivings on Kala sarpa Dosha, > Now I ask You. > 1) When I feel certain posts by any member does not go in line with > ethical nroms of astrology, or > 2) Suppose I have better explanation to give to native to satisfy > him,when I feel that the reply should have been more satisying to him, > then, > 1) Would You want me to speak up,having strong convictions, > for the betterment of astrolgy and its believers. or > > 2) remain mute spectator to what is going on, which may not be > proper ? > > I also know when I will do the former I will be creating oppositions > all the way,I dont mind that if the cause is good. > > Sir please give your kind advise. I promise I will listen whatever > You say. > > Yours affectionately. > Bhaskar. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Shri Panditji, Thank You for spending time in giving a detailed reply.I shall try to formulate my views in the way You have mentioned. At times if unintentionally detour is taken,then please overlook. Regards, Bhaskar. , "panditarjun2004" <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear bhaskarji > > you must respond to any mail to whom you feel like responding. > however, please follow these which i preach and practice: > > 1. express ONLY what you feel. > 2. do not criticise others views. > 3. you are entitled to express your views just as others express > their views. > 4. if you find a particular post of others objectionable like the > one where the astrolgoer mentioned a particular yoga meant only for > quacks. if i am in your shoes and i want to express my objection to > his posting, i will never criticise him but ask him like this: > > dear sir, you have mentioned that ksy is meant only quacks based on > your research and understanding. there are some old temples which > are jyotirlingas like nashik and kalahasti and many other temples > where this pooja has been in practice for centuries. at least i am > aware that in kalahasti they charge only rs.250 as of now (much less > earlier) for this pooja and give the prasadam to the native. they > are all noble priests not doing any business. do you think they are > also quacks who are doing this holy pious poojas in the name of > ksy. you will find rotten apples in all kinds of professions, but > to say that all remedies for this yoga are for quacks is not > supported by facts. an athiest may say that god does not exist and > hence all temples, mosques, churches and planet worships are all > menat only for quacks. unfortunatley facts do not support these > theories and WORSHIP IS A BELIEF OF A PERSON AND THE CONSTITUTION > HAS GIVEN FREEDOM OF PRACTICE OF ANY RELIGION WHICH MEANS ANY DIETY > OR ANY WORSHIP. SO KINDLY DESIST IN CRITICISING OTHERS FOR DOING > SOMETHING WHICH YOU DONT BELIEVE. > > if you write such a positve language, the person who wrote such > strong comments will not use further bad language. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > > , "bhaskar_jyotish" > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Dear Pandit Arjunji, > > Pranam. > > > > You have kindly suggested to me for my own well being, to > > have a positive bias in my writings and postings. > > I have just given a post to a gentleman (Of course nothing > personal) > > about HIS misgivings on Kala sarpa Dosha, > > Now I ask You. > > 1) When I feel certain posts by any member does not go in line > with > > ethical nroms of astrology, or > > 2) Suppose I have better explanation to give to native to satisfy > > him,when I feel that the reply should have been more satisying to > him, > > then, > > 1) Would You want me to speak up,having strong convictions, > > for the betterment of astrolgy and its believers. or > > > > 2) remain mute spectator to what is going on, which may not be > > proper ? > > > > I also know when I will do the former I will be creating > oppositions > > all the way,I dont mind that if the cause is good. > > > > Sir please give your kind advise. I promise I will listen whatever > > You say. > > > > Yours affectionately. > > Bhaskar. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.