Guest guest Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 >"Srila Sarasvati Thakura held a meeting with scholars from the caste >Gosvami camp, after which they appeared pacified." > >Is this acceptable? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 At 11:28 AM 7/17/2006 -0400, Bhakti Vikasa Swami wrote: >Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati pointed out the despicable situation in >Kuliya, where in the name of dharma women's ashrams had become virtual >brothels. > >Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati pointed out the despicable situation in >Kuliya, where in the name of dharma ashrams established for women had become >virtual brothels. > I would say the second one is better because it gives some key info the first one omits -- namely, that the ashrams were established for women (presumably by men) but then the women were cruelly exploited (also presumably by men). But that said, both versions say that the women's ashrams had become brothels in the name of dharma. That doesn't sound right. Isn't it like this?: Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati pointed out the despicable situation in Kuliya, where ashrams established for women in the name of dharma had become virtual brothels. >-- > > >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release 7/14/2006 -- Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/438 - Release 9/5/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.