BEING THE MIRROR ?

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

In "Being the MirrorBeing the False" everything is false even the Turiya, the real Self, is false.

If the primal Being resides in each of us, why is it that only a few could ever realise it's true nature?

Because falsity is the true nature of the primal being.

The primal being is like a mirror, never telling the truth and always telling the truth, always telling a different truth to every creature.

If we realise that falsity is indeed our real nature, and that we are in fact the mirror than how would you describe this nature best?

How to describe the nature of falsity?

Indeed falsity resides within each of us, and each of us is by nature this falsity.

But falsity is not aware of falsity, you are not aware that your real self is indeed your false self are you?

Your false self identifies with your real self naturally, for your false self it is only natural to identify with your real self, your false self is like a mirror, it has no problems to identify with yourself, it can identify itself with everything, falsity can identify itself with falsity.

There is no boundary for falsity to identify with, falsity can even identify itself with a mirror, with your mirror, and so with yourself.

To assume this falsity is the real primal being sounds ignorant !

You are this falsity, everyone is this falsity, falsity is our true nature.

But to realise our falsity and to realise that falsity is indeed our real self, is to realise that we are indeed the self of everyone, ...

 

As in Vedanta, in "Being the MirrorBeing the False" the seen and experienced world is false, the experiencer, the seer is false, the experiencing is false and even the true self, the Turiya is false.

In "Being the MirrorBeing the False" everything is false, all beings are false, the false is our true identity, but as our true identity is false, we identify with everything we are not...

For example... The primal false identity incarnates into each being... it grows up and developpes a sense of self... an identity... the so developped identity is what the primal false identity from now on believes to be...when it is in fact the primal false identity... it from now on believes to be it's new found identity... fact it still is and never will be something other than the primal false identity... only that it doesn't believe to be the primal false identity... it lives with the believe that it is the developped identity.

I know this is very complicated... maybe it helps if i explain that the primal false identity.... which is called "being the mirror" .... is also known as Brahman, God, the absolute.

But maybe it confuses things even more...

Think of the Brahman as being the primal false identity.

Think of the primal false identity being your identity.

Think of your identity being false, and think of your false identity being the nature of everything always or most naturally developping a false sense of self during growth.

i hope this makes more sense now ?

Lulu

Namaste,

 

>From the explanation contained in the above post, it would be

possible to say this:

 

In Vedanta the 'seen' or experienced world called prameya is false.

Also the 'seer', the experiencer called pramata is also false. The

seeing, the experiencing called pramanam is also false. This

constitutes the triputi that is negated by Advaita. In the language

of the Mandukya Upanishad, the vishva, the taijasa and the praajna

who are the experiencers of the gross, the subtle and the causal

worlds, are all a projection of ignorance; the Turiya transcending

all these three alone is the True Self.

 

If what is meant by you as 'we are ourselves false' is actually the

pramata, then there is no objection. Vedanta shows that the pramata,

the conscious entity, divested of his pramatritva, the

experiencerhood is the sole Reality. This attributeless Absolute

Consciousness is not negatable.

 

Pranams,

subbu