Guest guest Posted August 5, 2006 Report Share Posted August 5, 2006 Dear members/friends of the Tiruvenkatam Group, One of the fundamental tenets of the Vedic faith is that Man's journey through life is punctuated by a series of defining moments: moments in which soul-purificatory events take place and hence are to be duly celebrated through solemn ritual. Such defining moments in a man's life begin at his conception in the maternal womb and end when he is finally laid out to rest on a funeral pyre. Such life-defining moments or events are called, in the Vedic lexicon, "samskArA". Due performance of Vedic 'samskAra', and carrying out faithfully the various responsibilities in life it enjoins upon Man, is what, it is believed, prepares Man for, and renders his soul fully fit to undertake the greater journey of life hereafter. "vaideekaiihi: karmabhihi: pUnnyair-nishEkAdhir-dvijanmanAm I kAryah: shareera-samskArah: pAvanah: prEtya chEha cha II" (Manu-smriti II.2) (meaning): "With the sacred 'vaideeka' rites and rituals should be performed the various 'samskArAs' of the body, namely, 'nishEka' and all the rest too, of the twice-born, which purify here and hereafter". ***************** Many ancient Vedic texts -- especially the "smriti-s" of YagnyavAlkya and Manu, as well as the "grUhya-sUtrAs" of Apasthamba, Asvalayana etc. -- have handed down to us a great many list of 'samskArAs'. Most people who have some acquaintance with the Vedic tradition might have heard of the all-too-familiar expression: "40 samskArAs". But if anyone of us were asked to enumerate the 40, few would pass the test. That is because, in the course of centuries, Vedic society has all but given up due performance of these 'samskArAs' and none of us know what the 'samskArAs' really are other than that they numbered 40 once upon a time in the ancient past. The number "40" is of course a historical accident. There is no Vedic text to name that actually establishes the number of "samskArAs" to be exactly 40. The fact is that some 'smriti' texts name 10, others 52 and the rest provide a range somewhere between '10' and '52' with no definite order or sequence to the various "samskArAs". The fact of the matter is that the observance and performance of these 'samskArAs' too underwent change over the course of the centuries. Some periods in history saw society performing more number of 'samskArAs' while other periods practised fewer. In the present time in India, amongst the community of the Vedic faithful, the most popular Vedic "samskArAs" still very much in practice are only about 10 and they are, as you all probably already know: 1. garbhadAna (conception)6. annaprAsana (first solid morsel feed) 2. pumsavana (post-natal rite)7. choodAkarana (ritual tonsuring) 3. seemanthonnayana (pre-natal rite)8. upanayana (investiture of sacred thread) 4. jAtakarma 9. samAvartana (Vedic convocation) 5. naamakarana (naming ceremony)10. vivAha (marriage rites) *************** It is because the above 10 'samskArAs' are greatly in vogue today amongst common people that they seem to have eclipsed somewhat a few other less well-known "samskArAs" which however actually have a standing and weight that is equal to any other in the Vedic order. For example, amongst SriVaishnavites, the "pancha-samskAra" or the "samAshrayana" is a very special "samskAra" whose importance in life cannot be over-emphasized. Likewise, when a man completes 60 years of age, he and his spouse undergo the "samskAra" called "shashti-abdapoorthi". All these special but lesser-known 'samskArAs' serve to add very deep spiritual meaning to the journey of life of Man. The "sathAbhishEkam" or 80th birthday of a man is not, in the popular view, known as conduct of strict Vedic 'samskArA'. Some people in fact do not accept it strictly as 'samskAra' at all -- in the same sense as say "upanayana" or "vivAha" is regarded as 'samskAra'. IN fact, I have not myself come across a "gruhya-sUtra" text where "sathAbhishEkam" is specifically listed as an item in the list of Vedic "samskArAs". I am also ignorant of any references to a 'sathAbhishEkam' ceremony being performed for any personage or character anywhere in the Srimadh Ramayana or Mahabharatha (the two principal 'ithihAsAs') wherein one otherwise easily finds narrations about Rama undergoing "samskArAs" like "upanayana" etc. or Rama performing Jatayu's last rites ("prEta-samskArA" or "brahma-mEdham") etc. It is because of the rather un-sure or un-clear status of the "sathAbhishEkam" rite as a Vedic "samskArA" that very often in modern Vedic community, it is not performed with the same level of zest or fervor as perhaps a "vivAha" or "upanayana" ceremony. It is quite common to see this 'samskAra' being performed in what is generally called "a low-key" manner. Usually, the event will involve no more ritual activity than a humble offering of food to a nearby temple ("nitya-padi kainkaryam"); some others will else go to a great temple like Tirumala and offer there one of the several "aarjitha sevAs" to the Deity; yet others will simply make a donation in cash or kind to one of the public charities in their area such as an orphanage or home-for-the-aged etc. IN most cases, the person himself, for whose sake the event is to be conducted, will be extremely reluctant to undergo a ritual like the "sathAbhishEkam" especially if it involves a bit of fanfare. There are several reasons for their reluctance. Most eighty-year olds these days back home in India live for most of their aged lives quite alone, given that most of their children or grand-children have all either immigrated out of India or else taken jobs abroad for extended periods of time. Most 80-year olds therefore live alone in their homes and hence see little or no point in celebrating their 'sathAbhishEkam'. Another reason for reluctance on the past of many 80- year olds to celebrate this "samskAra" is this : a man of eighty who happens to have already lost his spouse has really no enthusiasm whatsoever to celebrate an event like his "sathAbhishEkam". In fact, it took a great deal of persuasion on my own part and my family's part to make my father finally accede to participate in his "sathAbhishEkam" celebrations. We all knew the extent of the despair he sank into when in 2002, his wife, Sangita Kalanidhi Mani Krishnaswami, passed away. He had never fully recovered from that bereavement four years ago. And it was the reason why the idea of performing his own "sathAbhishEkam" never enthused him very much. ************** Whatever may be the reasons of present-day custom or practice that either urge or discourage the observance of the 'samskAra' called "sathAbhishEkam", I strongly hold that we must never doubt the fact that our age-old Vedic ethos and value-system, in itself, does affirm in no uncertain terms the practice of venerating the aged and elderly in our families with due observance of the relevant "samskArA". Here is why I think so: IN the Vedic scheme of things, as you all know, there are 4 stages into which a man's life neatly falls. They are called "AsramAs": (1) "brahmachAri" (youthful student; age 5 to 21), (2) "gruhasthA" (the socially active and working householder age 25-65), (3) "vAnaprasthA" (the socially detached member; aged 65-80) the respectable "retired" senior-citizen of the community) and (4) the "sannyAsin" (the renunciate; age 80+ who in the evening of life is engaged in constant contemplation of its meaning, its value and its many blessings ("atma-vichAra")). The theory of the "4 AsramAs" is not a sociological relic of some distant past. Even in the 21st century a man's life, if one examines it carefully, does indeed more or less fit into this age-old Vedic pattern. Now, we may say that of the 4 "aasramAs", 3 are actually extensions of the "gruhasthAsramA". One leads to it and the other 2 lead away from it, all quite in natural and harmonious sequence. IN other words, the stage of "brahmachArya", we might say, graduates to that of the "grushastha"; and the stages of "vAnaprashtA" and "sannyAsa" transcend it. Of all the 4 stages of Man, it is the time he spends as a "gruhasthA" which is said to be of central importance. A good and successful "gruhastha" is said to be the evolute of a good and successful "brahmachArin"; and by the same token, a good and successful "gruhasthA" is said to be the seed or natural promise of a wise and good "vAnaprasthA" who will eventually emerge in old age to grow into becoming a most venerable "sannyAsin" towards the end of his mortal days and from whom we can learn invaluable lessons and truths of life. The centrality of the "gruhasthAsrama" in society, and the fact of it being the source of all human wisdom and goodness as seen fully fructified in old age amongst the elders of society i.e. "vAnaprasthAs" and "sannyAsins" -- this fact is very well and movingly underscored by Manu in his famous "smriti": brahmachArI gruhasThascha vAnaprasThO yatis-tathA I EthEy gruhasTha-prabhavAsh-chathvArah: pruThagAsramAh: II (Manu-smriti VI 87) "The student, the householder, the forest-dweller, the ascetic --- these, the four separate orders or stages in the life of man, are all but natural extensions of the householder". gruhasTasthU yadA pashyEdh valeepalita-mAtmanah: I apath-yasya tathA-pathyam tadhAraNyam samAshrayEth II (Manu-smriti VI.2) "When the householder sees the wrinkles grow on his skin, and his hair turn white, and has seen the son of his son having grown too, then let him retire to the forest". vanEshu tu vihrt-yaivam tritheeyam bhAgam-Ayushah: I chathurTham-AyushO BhAgam tyakthvA sanggAn parivrajEth II (ibid VI.33) "Having passed the third portion of life in the forests, let him, having abandoned attachments, wander (as an ascetic) during the fourth portion of his life". In the light of Manu's "smriti" above, it would be reasonable to look upon the "sathAbhishEkam" of a man as truly a glorious and final affirmation of the validity of Vedic "chaturAsrama". It is the celebration of a man's successful passage or transition from the "gruhasthAsrama" to that of "vanaprastha" and finally to "sannyAsa". ***************** (continued in Part 3) Regards, dAsan, Sudarshan Sudarshan Madabushi Chief Financial Officer & Vice-President KGL Ports International Plot A-21, Kuwait Free Trade Zone. PO BOx 24565, Safat 13106, Kuwait. Ph: (965)- 4827804/5 Ext 212 Fax: 4827806 mob: 7063337 email: mksudarshan2002 (AT) (DOT) co.in ________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.