Supposed to be [was Two kinds of ego]

[Guest guest]

Ammachi, "Bea Flexible" <timbussemer wrote:

>

> Everyone else is just where they are supposed to be in their

> evolvement.

 

I always wonder about the choice of saying we're where we're "supposed to be" versus just

saying that we are where we are. Sometimes, personally, I bristle against the language of

"supposed to be" (especially when all I can do is accept the reality of what is). Sometimes, I

wonder if there is some deeper meaning or purpose to me being in a given circumstance

or state at a given time. Sometimes, I'd like to think so and sometimes I just don't buy it.

 

Or...are we just where we are because we haven't developed/opened enough to be in

another place/state? Is that the same as saying we're "supposed to be" where we are?

Sometimes I think these are the same and sometimes I think they feel very different.

 

Contemplating and quite probably incoherent,

Iswari