Guest guest Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 Sounds like good advice, seriously. Anyone not wanting to participate should do that. Besides, listening to and dissecting my complaints about the locals or Dayamrita is great. Getting involved in defending the locals, well, that's Adharmic (out of your domain, etc.). Defending Big D "while igoring the Facts" of my arguments or changing the subject, only goes to support my position by default (avoidance, denial, etc.). Turning the issue back onto me and my ego, "in denial of the facts", is called the nasty influence of Metaphysics and psuedo-psychology. tom Ammachi, Mike Brooker <patria1818 wrote: > > I wonder what Keval , our moderator, thinks about > > these kinds of remarks in a public forum . > > > > > I just ignore Tom's comments about how Dayamarita > isn't up to the job, how the Washington DC-area > satsangs have gone into the crapper, or how 99.9% of > spiritual practices aren't up to snuff for him. Hit > the delete key and move on. I suggest you do that (as > well as using appropriate subject lines and snipping > regurgitated message text). > > Keval Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.