Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Reply to Balaji / tom's real concern

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Surya seems to have realized my political move: Get someone riled

up to do your bidding and then stand back and watch them do it...

Really, I'd love to know how Amma responds to your concerns, which

are echoed by enough others here. Please have the Courage to help a

clever brother, but keep the Kleenex close.

 

The point you're missing about "Bothering Amma" or "Dayamrita NOT

being bothered" is what concerns me... Am I not one of you? Am I

not a brother? No, I'm to be discarded and ignored because I'm a

detractor. Please, Big D, why not inquire since it's been so long,

and aren't you curious to know the truth? If I was in his Position,

I'd make some remark to the Points and Facts, and certainly engage my

hecklers in debate, as long as it was based on facts and not

manipulated by Rajo Guna. But it's easier to dismiss it as someone

not liking him personally, which is not completely true...

 

By all means, bring it up to Dayamritaji and follow the political

chain-of-command. While you're at it, give a plug to the LS

chanting...

 

Now's not the time to be proud, Big D!

tom

 

"At a time of renewal and re-organization, Dayamrita's Adharmic

actions only worsened things locally in DC, so that not much has

really changed, only different people in charge and increased pride

among the core. Ahh, politics. Can they not eat what they so often

dish out?" Little 't'

 

 

 

 

Ammachi, "Mahamuni Das" <mahamuni wrote:

>

> Dear Balaji,

>

> I am only saying don't bring it up to Amma because it is not worth

taking up even a moment of Her focus to do so. This is just my

opinion. Do as you see fit. It is okay with me either way.

>

> Maybe it would be prudent to bring it up to Dayamritaji first?

Maybe forward him some of Tom's remarks with Tom's email. Let them

get into a discussion directly, if that is what Dayamritaji wants.

>

> My views on Tom's statments are well known. I have said them

several times. I agree with everything you have written, of course.

>

> As far as Keval, I don't know why he allows such things. But he is

the moderator. What can we do, except start yet another forum. Is

it really of great interest to do so?

>

> Jai Maa!

>

> Surya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom,

 

Everyone is happy with your goal of having the LS chanted more often or in a bigger gathering. No arguments from anyone on that.

 

What people don't like is your methods, insults and negative comments. You can easily write or call Dayamritaji yourself. Why not just do that and not post such things on the board? Makes sense, no?

 

Surya

-

Tom

Ammachi

Friday, August 11, 2006 1:08 PM

Re: Reply to Balaji / tom's real concern

 

 

Surya seems to have realized my political move: Get someone riled

up to do your bidding and then stand back and watch them do it...

Really, I'd love to know how Amma responds to your concerns, which

are echoed by enough others here. Please have the Courage to help a

clever brother, but keep the Kleenex close.

 

The point you're missing about "Bothering Amma" or "Dayamrita NOT

being bothered" is what concerns me... Am I not one of you? Am I

not a brother? No, I'm to be discarded and ignored because I'm a

detractor. Please, Big D, why not inquire since it's been so long,

and aren't you curious to know the truth? If I was in his Position,

I'd make some remark to the Points and Facts, and certainly engage my

hecklers in debate, as long as it was based on facts and not

manipulated by Rajo Guna. But it's easier to dismiss it as someone

not liking him personally, which is not completely true...

 

By all means, bring it up to Dayamritaji and follow the political

chain-of-command. While you're at it, give a plug to the LS

chanting...

 

Now's not the time to be proud, Big D!

tom

 

"At a time of renewal and re-organization, Dayamrita's Adharmic

actions only worsened things locally in DC, so that not much has

really changed, only different people in charge and increased pride

among the core. Ahh, politics. Can they not eat what they so often

dish out?" Little 't'

 

Ammachi, "Mahamuni Das" <mahamuni wrote:

>

> Dear Balaji,

>

> I am only saying don't bring it up to Amma because it is not worth

taking up even a moment of Her focus to do so. This is just my

opinion. Do as you see fit. It is okay with me either way.

>

> Maybe it would be prudent to bring it up to Dayamritaji first?

Maybe forward him some of Tom's remarks with Tom's email. Let them

get into a discussion directly, if that is what Dayamritaji wants.

>

> My views on Tom's statments are well known. I have said them

several times. I agree with everything you have written, of course.

>

> As far as Keval, I don't know why he allows such things. But he is

the moderator. What can we do, except start yet another forum. Is

it really of great interest to do so?

>

> Jai Maa!

>

> Surya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...