Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 Dear Wendy, I am yet to hear from you on my research paper. Meanwhile, I was searching for data of parents and children and it occurred to me that your family data is available in the database. I have used the same and the results are presented below. You will undertand this table if you have read my paper. F - Father Rasi M - Mother Rasi C - Child Rasi Name: Andrew Rule Planet F M C Transformation Applicable Lagna 108 298 348 298+60=358, diff 10 (3rd) ATAI_01 Ravi 74 138 284 proper match not found yet to find Chandra 340 188 91 188-90=98,diff 7 (Kendra) ATAI_02 Budha 67 164 259 67+180=247,diff 12 (7th) ATAI_01 Sukra 67 141 320 141+180=321,diff 1 (7th) ATAI_01 Kuja 147 43 288 43+240=283,diff 5 (trine) ATAI_02 Guru 239 111 351 239+120=359,diff 8 (5th) ATAI_01 Sani 117 62 300 117+180=297, diff 3 (Kendra)ATAI_02 Rahu 18 111 77 18+60=78,diff 1 (3rd CDA) ATAI_04 Ketu 198 299 257 diff 1 (3rd) ATAI_04 In case of David, I am getting a different Lagna. I tried using JHora also. Even that gives the same Lagna as below. You seem to have given a different lagna in the database. I don't where I am going wrong. Name: David Rule Planet F M C Transformation Applicable Lagna 108 298 276 108+180=288,diff 12 (7th) ATAI_01 Ravi 74 138 192 138+60=198,diff 6 (3rd CDC) ATAI_04 Chandra 340 188 246 188+60=248,diff 2 (3rd CDA) ATAI_04 Budha 67 164 211 164+60=224,diff 13 (3rd CDC)ATAI_04 Sukra 67 141 238 67+180=247,diff 9 (7th) ATAI_01 Kuja 147 43 234 147+90=237,diff 3 (4th) ATAI_01 Guru 239 111 68 239-180=59,diff 9 (7th) ATAI_01 Sani 117 62 317 62+270=332,diff 15 (10th) ATAI_01 Rahu 18 111 43 18+30=48,diff 5 (2nd) ATAI_01 Ketu 198 299 223 diff 5 (2nd) ATAI_01 I did the calculations for Uttara's children also. I am getting acceptable results for them as well. Please give your feedback. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 Dear Krishna, I will take a look at your paper as soon as time allows... At the moment I'm trying to enjoy my (so-called) weekend away from the group in order to catch up with other correspondence, website updates and some much needed rest and recreation...although it rarely seems to work out that way :-( Regarding David's lagna, I assure you it is Sagittarius 23°59'21". I have no idea what data you're using for the father as it's not in the data base? You're welcome to have it though...data follows: George Gault Aug 19 1929 (13.25) Edinburgh, Scotland Lagna: Libra 16°58'20" It's an accepted rule that the genetic link between family members is seen primarily through (either) Lagna, Sun or Moon. Other (family) traits, that distinguish one sibling from the other, are further evident through planetary placements. See following... FATHER: Libra rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Capricorn. MOTHER: Capricorn rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Libra. 1ST CHILD: Sun in Capricorn ( ties in with both parents). 2ND CHILD: Sun in Libra (ties in with both parents). PS: David's T.O.B. is 10:01 (AM) Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com _____________________ - "Krishnamurthy Seetharama" <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya> Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:23 PM Some more data points Dear Wendy, I am yet to hear from you on my research paper. Meanwhile, I was searching for data of parents and children and it occurred to me that your family data is available in the database. I have used the same and the results are presented below. You will undertand this table if you have read my paper. F - Father Rasi M - Mother Rasi C - Child Rasi Name: Andrew Rule Planet F M C Transformation Applicable Lagna 108 298 348 298+60=358, diff 10 (3rd) ATAI_01 Ravi 74 138 284 proper match not found yet to find Chandra 340 188 91 188-90=98,diff 7 (Kendra) ATAI_02 Budha 67 164 259 67+180=247,diff 12 (7th) ATAI_01 Sukra 67 141 320 141+180=321,diff 1 (7th) ATAI_01 Kuja 147 43 288 43+240=283,diff 5 (trine) ATAI_02 Guru 239 111 351 239+120=359,diff 8 (5th) ATAI_01 Sani 117 62 300 117+180=297, diff 3 (Kendra)ATAI_02 Rahu 18 111 77 18+60=78,diff 1 (3rd CDA) ATAI_04 Ketu 198 299 257 diff 1 (3rd) ATAI_04 In case of David, I am getting a different Lagna. I tried using JHora also. Even that gives the same Lagna as below. You seem to have given a different lagna in the database. I don't where I am going wrong. Name: David Rule Planet F M C Transformation Applicable Lagna 108 298 276 108+180=288,diff 12 (7th) ATAI_01 Ravi 74 138 192 138+60=198,diff 6 (3rd CDC) ATAI_04 Chandra 340 188 246 188+60=248,diff 2 (3rd CDA) ATAI_04 Budha 67 164 211 164+60=224,diff 13 (3rd CDC)ATAI_04 Sukra 67 141 238 67+180=247,diff 9 (7th) ATAI_01 Kuja 147 43 234 147+90=237,diff 3 (4th) ATAI_01 Guru 239 111 68 239-180=59,diff 9 (7th) ATAI_01 Sani 117 62 317 62+270=332,diff 15 (10th) ATAI_01 Rahu 18 111 43 18+30=48,diff 5 (2nd) ATAI_01 Ketu 198 299 223 diff 5 (2nd) ATAI_01 I did the calculations for Uttara's children also. I am getting acceptable results for them as well. Please give your feedback. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 Dear Wendy, Please take your time. No hurry. Who is Vasicek Ronald? The database says that he is your husband. Looks like someone might have put it wrongly. I suspect he is one of your close relatives (brother?). That is why there were many mappings matching with your children and his chart. I will redo things using your husband's chart and resend the table. Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote: > Dear Krishna, > > I will take a look at your paper as soon as time allows... At > the moment I'm > trying to enjoy my (so-called) weekend away from the group in > order to catch > up with other correspondence, website updates and some much > needed rest and > recreation...although it rarely seems to work out that way :-( > > Regarding David's lagna, I assure you it is Sagittarius > 23°59'21". I have no > idea what data you're using for the father as it's not in the > data base? > You're welcome to have it though...data follows: > > George Gault > Aug 19 1929 (13.25) > Edinburgh, Scotland > Lagna: Libra 16°58'20" > > It's an accepted rule that the genetic link between family > members is seen > primarily through (either) Lagna, Sun or Moon. Other (family) > traits, that > distinguish one sibling from the other, are further evident > through > planetary placements. See following... > > FATHER: Libra rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Capricorn. > MOTHER: Capricorn rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Libra. > > 1ST CHILD: Sun in Capricorn ( ties in with both parents). > 2ND CHILD: Sun in Libra (ties in with both parents). > > PS: David's T.O.B. is 10:01 (AM) > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > _____________________ > > - > "Krishnamurthy Seetharama" <krishna_1998 > > <jyotish-vidya> > Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:23 PM > Some more data points > > > Dear Wendy, > > I am yet to hear from you on my research paper. Meanwhile, I > was > searching for data of parents and children and it occurred to > me > that your family data is available in the database. I have > used > the same and the results are presented below. You will > undertand > this table if you have read my paper. > > F - Father Rasi > M - Mother Rasi > C - Child Rasi > > Name: Andrew Rule > Planet F M C Transformation Applicable > Lagna 108 298 348 298+60=358, diff 10 (3rd) ATAI_01 > Ravi 74 138 284 proper match not found yet to find > Chandra 340 188 91 188-90=98,diff 7 (Kendra) ATAI_02 > Budha 67 164 259 67+180=247,diff 12 (7th) ATAI_01 > Sukra 67 141 320 141+180=321,diff 1 (7th) ATAI_01 > Kuja 147 43 288 43+240=283,diff 5 (trine) ATAI_02 > Guru 239 111 351 239+120=359,diff 8 (5th) ATAI_01 > Sani 117 62 300 117+180=297, diff 3 (Kendra)ATAI_02 > Rahu 18 111 77 18+60=78,diff 1 (3rd CDA) ATAI_04 > Ketu 198 299 257 diff 1 (3rd) ATAI_04 > > In case of David, I am getting a different Lagna. I tried > using > JHora also. Even that gives the same Lagna as below. You seem > to > have given a different lagna in the database. I don't where I > am > going wrong. > > Name: David Rule > Planet F M C Transformation Applicable > Lagna 108 298 276 108+180=288,diff 12 (7th) ATAI_01 > Ravi 74 138 192 138+60=198,diff 6 (3rd CDC) ATAI_04 > Chandra 340 188 246 188+60=248,diff 2 (3rd CDA) ATAI_04 > Budha 67 164 211 164+60=224,diff 13 (3rd CDC)ATAI_04 > Sukra 67 141 238 67+180=247,diff 9 (7th) ATAI_01 > Kuja 147 43 234 147+90=237,diff 3 (4th) ATAI_01 > Guru 239 111 68 239-180=59,diff 9 (7th) ATAI_01 > Sani 117 62 317 62+270=332,diff 15 (10th) ATAI_01 > Rahu 18 111 43 18+30=48,diff 5 (2nd) ATAI_01 > Ketu 198 299 223 diff 5 (2nd) ATAI_01 > > I did the calculations for Uttara's children also. I am > getting > acceptable results for them as well. > > Please give your feedback. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 Dear Krishna, Did you not question why my children have the surname 'Gault' whilst my husband and I have the surname 'Vasicek'? The children's father (George Gault) was my first husband (of 17 yrs). Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com _____________________ - "Krishnamurthy Seetharama" <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya> Saturday, September 02, 2006 6:06 PM Re: Some more data points Dear Wendy, Please take your time. No hurry. Who is Vasicek Ronald? The database says that he is your husband. Looks like someone might have put it wrongly. I suspect he is one of your close relatives (brother?). That is why there were many mappings matching with your children and his chart. I will redo things using your husband's chart and resend the table. Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote: > Dear Krishna, > > I will take a look at your paper as soon as time allows... At > the moment I'm > trying to enjoy my (so-called) weekend away from the group in > order to catch > up with other correspondence, website updates and some much > needed rest and > recreation...although it rarely seems to work out that way :-( > > Regarding David's lagna, I assure you it is Sagittarius > 23°59'21". I have no > idea what data you're using for the father as it's not in the > data base? > You're welcome to have it though...data follows: > > George Gault > Aug 19 1929 (13.25) > Edinburgh, Scotland > Lagna: Libra 16°58'20" > > It's an accepted rule that the genetic link between family > members is seen > primarily through (either) Lagna, Sun or Moon. Other (family) > traits, that > distinguish one sibling from the other, are further evident > through > planetary placements. See following... > > FATHER: Libra rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Capricorn. > MOTHER: Capricorn rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Libra. > > 1ST CHILD: Sun in Capricorn ( ties in with both parents). > 2ND CHILD: Sun in Libra (ties in with both parents). > > PS: David's T.O.B. is 10:01 (AM) > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > _____________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 deary Wendy, Sorry about the confusion. I did get a doubt. However, in different regions there different practices about sir names. For example in my region, in many communities the child takes fathers's first name as its sirname. It might sound strange. Hence, I did not give much attention to that. I just went by what is given in the database. My apologies for the same. Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote: > Dear Krishna, > > Did you not question why my children have the surname 'Gault' > whilst my > husband and I have the surname 'Vasicek'? > > The children's father (George Gault) was my first husband (of > 17 yrs). > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > _____________________ > > - > "Krishnamurthy Seetharama" <krishna_1998 > > <jyotish-vidya> > Saturday, September 02, 2006 6:06 PM > Re: Some more data points > > > Dear Wendy, > > Please take your time. No hurry. > > Who is Vasicek Ronald? The database says that he is your > husband. Looks like someone might have put it wrongly. I > suspect > he is one of your close relatives (brother?). That is why > there > were many mappings matching with your children and his chart. > > I will redo things using your husband's chart and resend the > table. > > Regards, > Krishna > > --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > > > I will take a look at your paper as soon as time allows... > At > > the moment I'm > > trying to enjoy my (so-called) weekend away from the group > in > > order to catch > > up with other correspondence, website updates and some much > > needed rest and > > recreation...although it rarely seems to work out that way > :-( > > > > Regarding David's lagna, I assure you it is Sagittarius > > 23°59'21". I have no > > idea what data you're using for the father as it's not in > the > > data base? > > You're welcome to have it though...data follows: > > > > George Gault > > Aug 19 1929 (13.25) > > Edinburgh, Scotland > > Lagna: Libra 16°58'20" > > > > It's an accepted rule that the genetic link between family > > members is seen > > primarily through (either) Lagna, Sun or Moon. Other > (family) > > traits, that > > distinguish one sibling from the other, are further evident > > through > > planetary placements. See following... > > > > FATHER: Libra rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Capricorn. > > MOTHER: Capricorn rising - Sun in Leo - Moon in Libra. > > > > 1ST CHILD: Sun in Capricorn ( ties in with both parents). > > 2ND CHILD: Sun in Libra (ties in with both parents). > > > > PS: David's T.O.B. is 10:01 (AM) > > > > Best Wishes, > > Mrs. Wendy > > http://JyotishVidya.com > > _____________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.