Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

Currently we are discussing your point b): "Srila Prabhupada never ordered

that he should ever stop being the diksa guru for ISKCON."

 

On March 31, 2006 I wrote:

> So if in your point b) by "the diksa guru for ISKCON" you mean "the sole

> diksa guru for ISKCON", then you are actually claiming that until today

> Srila Prabhupada did not authorize any person to be a diksa guru in

> ISKCON.

 

Then on April 2, 2006 you wrote:

> > you are actually claiming that until today Srila Prabhupada did not

> > authorize any person to be a diksa guru in ISKCON.

>

> That is correct.

 

You don't know how a devotee is authorized to be a diksa guru, but still you

are claiming that until today Srila Prabhupada did not authorize any person

to be a diksa guru in ISKCON. That is rascaldom.

 

In your last text you presented all kinds of things (e.g. that Aristotle

would be turning in his grave) but no proof of your point b).

 

Conclusion:

 

Your point b) is unproven. And since your whole theory is based on that

unproven assumption, your whole theory is unproven.

 

If you agree with that, we can move to your point c). But probably you do

not agree and you will continue to present statements that do not prove your

point b).

 

Do you believe that you point b) is proven? If yes, why?

 

ys Ramakanta dasa